On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
snowweb wrote:
>
> I tried to view the files bayes.toks, bayes.journal, bayes.seen and
> autowhitelist but they just look jibberish when opened in a unix
> editor. What's the solution to this? I was hoping to be able to tweak
> some of the scores and add
snowweb wrote:
> I tried to view the files bayes.toks, bayes.journal, bayes.seen and
> autowhitelist but they just look jibberish when opened in a unix editor.
> What's the solution to this?
>
The bayes database stores truncated SHA1 hashes of the words, it is not
reversible back to human readab
twofers wrote:
> I get:
> * -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at
> http://www.dnswl.org/, low
> * trust
>
> and I read the dnswl.org home page, but I don't understand why this
> rule would get a -1.0 for a "LOW" trust rating.
>
> It just seems awkward to me, I think
I tried to view the files bayes.toks, bayes.journal, bayes.seen and
autowhitelist but they just look jibberish when opened in a unix editor.
What's the solution to this? I was hoping to be able to tweak some of the
scores and add certain words etc.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nab
On Fri, July 24, 2009 20:10, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> I have long wanted to be able to
>> whitelist_from f...@bar -3.0
>> to have per-entry scores. Obviously though I haven't wanted it enough
>> to write the code.
> How does this not work?
>header WL_FRO
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 11:57 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Greg Troxel wrote:
> > > > I have long wanted to be able to
> > > >
> > > > whitelist_from f...@bar -3.0
> > > >
> > > > to have per-entry scores. Obviously though I haven't wanted it
> > > > enough to write the code.
F
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Greg Troxel wrote:
John Hardin writes:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Greg Troxel wrote:
I have long wanted to be able to
whitelist_from f...@bar -3.0
to have per-entry scores. Obviously though I haven't wanted it
enough to write the code.
How does this not work?
header W
John Hardin writes:
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>> I have long wanted to be able to
>>
>> whitelist_from f...@bar -3.0
>>
>> to have per-entry scores. Obviously though I haven't wanted it
>> enough to write the code.
>
> How does this not work?
>
> header WL_FROM_FOO From =~
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Greg Troxel wrote:
I have long wanted to be able to
whitelist_from f...@bar -3.0
to have per-entry scores. Obviously though I haven't wanted it enough
to write the code.
How does this not work?
header WL_FROM_FOO From =~ /\bf...@bar/i
score WL_FROM_FOO -3.00
jida...@jidanni.org writes:
> Actually there should be one or two more whitelists, so one can e.g., score
> -100 one's friends
> -10 one's schools
> -1 one's country
I have long wanted to be able to
whitelist_from f...@bar -3.0
to have per-entry scores. Obviously though I haven't wanted i
Actually there should be one or two more whitelists, so one can e.g., score
-100 one's friends
-10 one's schools
-1 one's country
> >> LuKreme wrote:
> >> > On Jul 23, 2009, at 22:45, snowweb wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Is the email with attachment over 250KB?
> >
> > On 24.07.09 01:13, snowweb wrote:
> >> No, it's just 74Kb
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > the email or the attachment? In config you posted e-mails over 100K
>
On Fri, July 24, 2009 14:07, twofers wrote:
> I get:
> * -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
> low
> * trust
>
> and I read the dnswl.org home page, but I don't understand why this rule
> would get a -1.0 for a "LOW" trust rating.
you can o
They only White-list.
So if the trust is higher, then the score should be lower...
Cheers,
twofers írta:
I get:
* -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, low
* trust
and I read the dnswl.org home page, but I don't understand why this rule
w
I get:
* -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low
* trust
and I read the dnswl.org home page, but I don't understand why this rule would
get a -1.0 for a "LOW" trust rating.
It just seems awkward to me, I think LOW trust would dictate a posi
Hello Folks,
Did you also get many spams from "United-MAP, a dynamic company with
rapid development, with a united team of professionals in its core."? :)
Or maybe this new spam flood is only Poland targeted?
Here are a few spam samples:
http://pastebin.com/m178f4a58
http://pastebin.com/m6d07f79
>
>
>
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The headers of the strange spam are:
>>>
>>> Return-path:
>>> Envelope-to: u...@host.co.uk
>>> Delivery-date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:12:38 +0800
>>> Received: from [190.144.0.42] (helo=CWXNQKBTZ)
>>>by s1.host.info with esmtp (Exim 4.67)
>>>(
I just installed on qmailtoaster with spamassassin and
clamv.
Looking at email full header I realize that the messages not
been scanned.
Something is not working as it should. Can someone help me.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>> LuKreme wrote:
>> > On Jul 23, 2009, at 22:45, snowweb wrote:
>> >
>> > Is the email with attachment over 250KB?
>
> On 24.07.09 01:13, snowweb wrote:
>> No, it's just 74Kb
>
> the email or the attachment? In config you posted e-mails over 100K
> aren't ch
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> > It apparently was never seen by SpamAssassin, if there were no X-Spam-*
> > -headers.
> >
> > How you call SpamAssassin? Any whitelisting there, do you call
> > SpamAssassin for your own mail? It seems the sender address is same as
> > receiver address. Whitelisted so
> LuKreme wrote:
> > On Jul 23, 2009, at 22:45, snowweb wrote:
> >
> > Is the email with attachment over 250KB?
On 24.07.09 01:13, snowweb wrote:
> No, it's just 74Kb
the email or the attachment? In config you posted e-mails over 100K
aren't checked. 74K attachment results in >100K mail.
--
M
> Le 24/07/2009 04:09, MySQL Student a écrit :
>> I don't doubt that if we removed a substantial amount of them that SA
>> would do what's right, but there doesn't seem to be any scientific way
>> to do that successfully.
>
> Can't you just look at the scores that the whitelisted messages are
> g
On 7/24/2009 11:34 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
Hiya
Do any of you guys use the following list.
http://malware.hiperlinks.com.br/cgi/submit?action=list_sa
If so, may I ask how do you find the results, and is it worth adding to
spamassassin.
I've been using the ClamAV sigs for quite a while.
They
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:34, Brent Clark wrote:
>
> Do any of you guys use the following list.
>
> http://malware.hiperlinks.com.br/cgi/submit?action=list_sa
>
> If so, may I ask how do you find the results, and is it worth adding to
> spamassassin.
>
Hi,
We use malwarepatrol with our central
looks interesting! I've asked the developer if he's interested in us
testing it out
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:34, Brent Clark wrote:
> Hiya
>
> Do any of you guys use the following list.
>
> http://malware.hiperlinks.com.br/cgi/submit?action=list_sa
>
> If so, may I ask how do you find the r
Hiya
Do any of you guys use the following list.
http://malware.hiperlinks.com.br/cgi/submit?action=list_sa
If so, may I ask how do you find the results, and is it worth adding to
spamassassin.
Kind Regards
Brent Clark
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>>
>> The headers of the strange spam are:
>>
>> Return-path:
>> Envelope-to: u...@host.co.uk
>> Delivery-date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:12:38 +0800
>> Received: from [190.144.0.42] (helo=CWXNQKBTZ)
>>by s1.host.info with esmtp (Exim 4.67)
>>(envelope-fro
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
> It apparently was never seen by SpamAssassin, if there were no X-Spam-*
> -headers.
>
> How you call SpamAssassin? Any whitelisting there, do you call
> SpamAssassin for your own mail? It seems the sender address is same as
> receiver address. Whitelisted somehow, a
LuKreme wrote:
>
> On Jul 23, 2009, at 22:45, snowweb wrote:
>
> Is the email with attachment over 250KB?
>
No, it's just 74Kb
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Certain-spam-not-parsed-by-spamd%21-tp24638560p24640402.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing lis
On Jul 23, 2009, at 22:45, snowweb wrote:
there is one email which seems capable of avoiding
getting parsed by spamd.
Is the email with attachment over 250KB?
30 matches
Mail list logo
