On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
>> >> That makes sense. However, the OP was looking to do the opposite.. Run
>> >> clamav *LAST* and try to shortcircuit before you get there.
>
>> RobertH wrote:
>> > why do the opposite of the logical?
>
> On 03.01.09 17:42, Matt Kett
On 03.01.09 19:23, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> I feel this because my CPU consumption goes up when clamav is working.
> However, Im testing solution you givme.
If you have some solution that uses clamscan (not clamdscan), especially
with versions of clamav older than 0.91, it costs much of t
Thankx
I feel this because my CPU consumption goes up when clamav is working.
However, Im testing solution you givme.
Thankx
On Saturday 03 January 2009 17:10:25 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > >> That makes sense. However, the OP was looking to do the opposite.. Run
> > >> clamav *LAST* and
> >> That makes sense. However, the OP was looking to do the opposite.. Run
> >> clamav *LAST* and try to shortcircuit before you get there.
> RobertH wrote:
> > why do the opposite of the logical?
On 03.01.09 17:42, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Apparently the OP feels that clamav is heavy-weight enoug
RobertH wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> That makes sense. However, the OP was looking to do the opposite.. Run
>> clamav *LAST* and try to shortcircuit before you get there.
>>
>>
>>
>
> why do the opposite of the logical?
>
>
Apparently the OP feels that clamav is heavy-weight enough to be wo
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
You mean
as a milter for example?
A clamav-only milter, yes, assuming your SA milter can be told to file or
discard the message and thus bypass AV scanning.
On Friday 02 January 2009 19:30:05 John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Luis
André Léonard a écrit :
> SpamAssassin 3.2.4 on windows
>
> I receive some mail via a mail relay running SA (DynDns). How to run my
> own SA keeping the DynDNS X_SPAM_report available ?
> How to rename the already included header BEFORE adding the new one ?
>
you can rewrite the "old" head
> >
> That makes sense. However, the OP was looking to do the opposite.. Run
> clamav *LAST* and try to shortcircuit before you get there.
>
>
why do the opposite of the logical?
- rh
Many thanks
You give me an idea on how to configure
Regards,
LD
On Saturday 03 January 2009 08:48:39 Justin Mason wrote:
> Matt Kettler writes:
> >Justin Mason wrote:
> >> John Hardin writes:
> >>> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> it is for short-circuit. Because like
SpamAssassin 3.2.4 on windows
I receive some mail via a mail relay running SA (DynDns). How to run my own SA
keeping the DynDNS X_SPAM_report available ?
How to rename the already included header BEFORE adding the new one ?
I tried this :
remove_header all Report
add_header all LocalReport _R
I will be out of the office starting 12/31/2008 and will not return until
01/05/2009.
If it is an emergency, the help line at 760-6277
-- Confidentiality Notice --
This email message, including all the attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and contains confidential in
Matt Kettler writes:
>Justin Mason wrote:
>> John Hardin writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
>>>
>>>
it is for short-circuit. Because likehood of being SPAM is higher than
a Mail with virii, and because virii test needs more power, Id like to
>>>
Justin Mason wrote:
> John Hardin writes:
>
>> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
>>
>>
>>> it is for short-circuit. Because likehood of being SPAM is higher than
>>> a Mail with virii, and because virii test needs more power, Id like to
>>> send to back virii test.
>>>
Justin Mason wrote on Sat, 03 Jan 2009 09:53:12 +:
> It's perfectly fine to run ClamAV as a plugin and shortcircuit;
Justin, he wants to short-circuit before clamav, not because of it.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 18:58 -0600, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> [...] and because virii test needs more power, Id like to send to back
> virii test.
Wrong. ClamAV takes less time and CPU per message than SA.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
John Hardin writes:
>On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
>
>> it is for short-circuit. Because likehood of being SPAM is higher than
>> a Mail with virii, and because virii test needs more power, Id like to
>> send to back virii test.
>
>You might have more success incorporating
16 matches
Mail list logo
