RobertH wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>> That makes sense. However, the OP was looking to do the opposite.. Run 
>> clamav *LAST* and try to shortcircuit before you get there.
>>
>>
>>     
>
> why do the opposite of the logical?
>
>   
Apparently the OP feels that clamav is heavy-weight enough to be worth
shortcircuiting before it. I'd disagree myself, and do it the way Justin
does (clamav first and shortcircuit everything else).





Reply via email to