Many thanks You give me an idea on how to configure
Regards, LD On Saturday 03 January 2009 08:48:39 Justin Mason wrote: > Matt Kettler writes: > >Justin Mason wrote: > >> John Hardin writes: > >>> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: > >>>> it is for short-circuit. Because likehood of being SPAM is higher > >>>> than a Mail with virii, and because virii test needs more power, Id > >>>> like to send to back virii test. > >>> > >>> You might have more success incorporating clamav through some other way > >>> than as a SA plugin, then. Running it as a separate filter *after* SA, > >>> assuming that the glue lets you file/discard the message based on the > >>> SA score before running it through clamav... > >> > >> It's perfectly fine to run ClamAV as a plugin and shortcircuit; that's > >> what I do, using the plugin on the Wiki. Since Clam calls phishes > >> "viruses", it's a good way to rescue those for the spam corpus. > >> > >> > >> loadplugin ClamAV clamav.pm > >> full CLAMAV eval:check_clamav() > >> describe CLAMAV Clam AntiVirus detected a virus > >> priority CLAMAV -900 > >> score CLAMAV 20 > >> shortcircuit CLAMAV spam > > > >That makes sense. However, the OP was looking to do the opposite.. Run > >clamav *LAST* and try to shortcircuit before you get there. > > oops! my mistake, misread that. ;) > > --j.
