On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, LuKreme wrote:
On 16-Dec-2008, at 23:57, ram wrote:
http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html
I did the 'request a quote'. For 3,000 users and 550,000 emails a day (hey,
i was just making up numbers here) the cost is US$600/year. If you're a
non-profit it's $500/year.
On Tors, December 18, 2008 01:48, Nelson Serafica wrote:
> And is it ok to put rules also on local.cf
> located on /etc/mail/spamassassin
spamassassin 2>&1 -D --lint | less
shows more info on what files / dirs are used
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust
Matt Kettler wrote:
> AFAIK, razor isn't available via CPAN. (yes, there is such a thing as a
> perl module that isn't in perl)
>
*ACK*
Correction "Yes, there is such a thing as a perl module that isn't in CPAN"
ie: it's not law that all perl code in the universe be in CPAN.
Marcin Krol wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm trying to get Razor2 configured, I get this in spamassassin -D
> --lint output:
>
> [24407] dbg: diag: module not installed: Razor2::Client::Agent
> ('require' failed)
>
> But. When I try to install/search for this via CPAN, I get:
>
> cpan> i /Razor2::C
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Sure we can do
> meta META0 TEST1 && TEST2
> but say TEST2 is expensive, and we only want it to be run if TEST1 is
> positive. I suppose SpamAssassin's whole train of thought has no ifs
> ands or buts, other than a method of quitting early, but that not what
> I want
On 17/12/2008 8:26 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Sure we can do
> meta META0 TEST1 && TEST2
> but say TEST2 is expensive, and we only want it to be run if TEST1 is
> positive. I suppose SpamAssassin's whole train of thought has no ifs
> ands or buts, other than a method of quitting early, but
THanks for the clarification.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:20 AM, mouss wrote:
>
> that's probably the right place. there should be a local.cf file there.
> you can either add your rules in local.cf or put them in a file which
> names ends in ".cf" (for example: site.cf).
>
>
> you can run spamassa
Sure we can do
meta META0 TEST1 && TEST2
but say TEST2 is expensive, and we only want it to be run if TEST1 is
positive. I suppose SpamAssassin's whole train of thought has no ifs
ands or buts, other than a method of quitting early, but that not what
I want to do. I suppose branching is only poss
Nelson Serafica a écrit :
> I just want to verify where is the correct directory to put customized
> .cf files. I have downloaded some .cf files and place it on
> /etc/mail/spamassassin.
that's probably the right place. there should be a local.cf file there.
you can either add your rules in local.
I just want to verify where is the correct directory to put customized .cf
files. I have downloaded some .cf files and place it on
/etc/mail/spamassassin. How would I know that spamassassin is calling that
rule? Also, is it true that you should not put customize rules in default
rules of spamassass
LuKreme a écrit :
> On 16-Dec-2008, at 23:57, ram wrote:
>> http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html
>
>
> I did the 'request a quote'. For 3,000 users and 550,000 emails a day
> (hey, i was just making up numbers here) the cost is US$600/year. If
> you're a non-profit it's $500/year.
>
> Conside
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 15:49 -0500, Greg Skouby wrote:
> http://pastebin.com/m791c34be
Here's just the SA headers:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
zoogz.gregorie.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.5 required=6.0
tests=FORGED_MUA_EUDORA,MG_SEX1,
U
On 16-Dec-2008, at 23:57, ram wrote:
http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html
I did the 'request a quote'. For 3,000 users and 550,000 emails a day
(hey, i was just making up numbers here) the cost is US$600/year. If
you're a non-profit it's $500/year.
Considering that includes SUPPORT, t
Hi!
"steadyrelationships DOT com" is currently blacklisted on ivmURI
It was added to ivmURI at 12/16/2008, 6:31:03 PM EST
(I think that time is before that spam arrived at your server, but
double-check me on that)
steadyrelationships .com is on SURBL lists: JP
Bye,
Raymond.
Greg Skouby wrote:
> Can you please do me a favor and run this through your setup and let me know
> what it scores:
> http://pastebin.com/m791c34be
> As of now the URL at the bottom is not in URIBL or SURBL and the sending IP
> is not on any major blacklist. I am curious if others have rules that
No, I love perl,
I think because it is not binary code, it is slower and use more memory, just
that.
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 14:22:20 mouss wrote:
> Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit :
> > Hey Robert
> >
> > I know, amavis is the best antispam machine for SA+Clamv, but I have a
> >
Hrm, I get exactly the same score:
Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay
lines
0.0 BAYE
Hi Everybody,
Can you please do me a favor and run this through your setup and let me know
what it scores:
http://pastebin.com/m791c34be
As of now the URL at the bottom is not in URIBL or SURBL and the sending IP is
not on any major blacklist. I am curious if others have rules that hit on
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit :
> Hey Robert
>
> I know, amavis is the best antispam machine for SA+Clamv, but I have a little
> box, 256MB or ram and no swap (dont ask why). There for, because amavis is
> running under perl, it use alot of memory and then I'm having pipe errors.
>
if you
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to get Razor2 configured, I get this in spamassassin -D
--lint output:
[24407] dbg: diag: module not installed: Razor2::Client::Agent
('require' failed)
But. When I try to install/search for this via CPAN, I get:
cpan> i /Razor2::Client/
No objects found of any t
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz schrieb:
> Hey Robert
>
> I know, amavis is the best antispam machine for SA+Clamv, but I have a little
> box, 256MB or ram and no swap (dont ask why). There for, because amavis is
> running under perl, it use alot of memory and then I'm having pipe errors.
>
> I've fo
Yes, thanks
I use dspam
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 03:24:35 Justin Mason wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 23:35, Karsten Bräckelmann
>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 15:06 +, Justin Mason wrote:
> >> actually, Bayes would be a good one to drop. If you also remove AWL,
> >> and commen
Hey Robert
I know, amavis is the best antispam machine for SA+Clamv, but I have a little
box, 256MB or ram and no swap (dont ask why). There for, because amavis is
running under perl, it use alot of memory and then I'm having pipe errors.
I've found how to use SA+CLAM+Postfix without Amavis.
Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit :
> Back on-list.
>
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 17:02 +0530, ram wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:16 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> score *_SURBL 0
I dont want that since that will cause a lint fail incase the rules are
removed later
>>> No, it won't, i
Back on-list.
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 17:02 +0530, ram wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:16 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > > score *_SURBL 0
> > >
> > > I dont want that since that will cause a lint fail incase the rules are
> > > removed later
> >
> > No, it won't, it lints just fine.
>
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:27 +0530, ram wrote:
> > score *_SURBL 0
>
> I dont want that since that will cause a lint fail incase the rules are
> removed later
No, it won't, it lints just fine.
# cat foo.cf
score NO_SUCH_RULE 0
# spamassassin --lint; echo $?
0
Why do you claim it would? Testin
Justin Mason a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 23:35, Karsten Bräckelmann
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 15:06 +, Justin Mason wrote:
>>
>>> actually, Bayes would be a good one to drop. If you also remove AWL,
>>> and comment out both "loadplugin" lines, you will remove the need to
>>> l
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 23:35, Karsten Bräckelmann
wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 15:06 +, Justin Mason wrote:
>
>> actually, Bayes would be a good one to drop. If you also remove AWL,
>> and comment out both "loadplugin" lines, you will remove the need to
>> load the DB_File database module
On 17.12.08 12:05, ram wrote:
> I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they are
> no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
I think they dropped charges a bit, did you look now?
> I would just put a 0.0 score in local.cf for all their rules , but I
> guess wh
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Ons, December 17, 2008 07:35, ram wrote:
I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they
are no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
show links where this is stated or make a bug on it :)
else:
score *_SURBL 0
> On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 15:06 +, Justin Mason wrote:
>
> > actually, Bayes would be a good one to drop. If you also remove AWL,
> > and comment out both "loadplugin" lines, you will remove the need to
> > load the DB_File database module too.
> >
> > commenting plugins and removing rulesets
> Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:33:20 -0600:
>
> > I have now 39mb of free ram, enogut to work
On 17.12.08 00:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> You have more, use free.
It means "use the 'free' command and look onto '-/+ buffers/cache'".
total used free
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, ram wrote:
I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they are
no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
I would just put a 0.0 score in local.cf for all their rules , but I
guess when the rules are removed from the actual cf files by sa-upd
33 matches
Mail list logo
