Back on-list.
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 17:02 +0530, ram wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:16 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > > score *_SURBL 0
> > >
> > > I dont want that since that will cause a lint fail incase the rules are
> > > removed later
> >
> > No, it won't, it lints just fine.
> >
> > # cat foo.cf
> > score NO_SUCH_RULE 0
> >
> > # spamassassin --lint; echo $?
> > 0
>
> $? is 0 alright. But you get a warning score set for a non existant
> rule
That was a straight copy-n-paste. I don't see no warning, lint didn't
complain or output anything.
> Unfortunately , when that happens I get alerts sent from my monitoring
> system. I will have to change all that
Err, whatever. Even IF your watchdog would alert you -- I don't see the
SURBL rules to be removed from the stock rule set anytime soon, or
anytime at all for that matter. Why bother?
If your watchdog is more strict than SA --lint itself, IMHO your
watchdog needs to be fixed.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
