Hrm, I get exactly the same score:
Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay
lines
0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.4995]
2.5 FORGED_MUA_EUDORA Forged mail pretending to be from Eudora
Interestingly enough it hit a bunch of Subrules:
[16405] dbg: check:
subtests=__ANY_QUALCOMM_MUA,__CT,__CT_TEXT_PLAIN,__EUDORA_MU
A,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_RCVD,__HAS_SUBJECT,__HAS_X_MAILER,__HAS_X_PRIORITY,_
_LOCAL_P
P_NONPPURL,__MIME_VERSION,__MSGID_OK_HOST,__NAKED_TO,__NONEMPTY_BODY,__R
ATWARE_0
_TZ_DATE,__SANE_MSGID,__SARE_BODY_BLNK_5_100,__SARE_META_MURTY3,__SARE_U
RI_ANY,_
_SARE_WHITELIST_FLAG,__TOCC_EXISTS,__TVD_BODY,__TVD_MIME_ATT_TP
But must have missed enough for the combined rules not to fire.
Cheers,
Michael Hutchinson
Manux Solutions Ltd
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Skouby [mailto:gsko...@mail.sitesnow.com] On Behalf Of Greg
> Skouby
> Sent: 18 December 2008 9:50 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Spam slipping through
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
>
> Can you please do me a favor and run this through your setup and let
me
> know what it scores:
>
>
> http://pastebin.com/m791c34be
>
>
>
> As of now the URL at the bottom is not in URIBL or SURBL and the
sending
> IP is not on any major blacklist. I am curious if others have rules
that
> hit on this.
>
> (I know 2.5 is a *really* low required score)
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> --Greg
