On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 01:15:48PM -0800, Bill Randle wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 09:51 +1300, Lists wrote:
> > Bill Randle wrote:
> > > * 5.5 BOTNET Relay might be a spambot or virusbot
> > > * [botnet0.8,ip=200.219.72.83,nordns]
> > >
> > I will look into the BOTNET as
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 10:11 pm, you wrote:
> In the Forum section of the Buhono site, I found the following:
> ' The Bohuno service is backwards compatible to the original PyzorD and
> ' Pyzor client. To use Bohuno, update the ~/.pyzor/servers file and add
> ' 82.94.255.100:24441
> '
> ' I
--On November 26, 2008 9:38:27 PM -0600 Chris is rumoured to have written:
> Has anyone else seen this? I'm trying to find out from the new author
> whether it will work with SA. I would think that a new plug-in would
> have to be written?
In the Forum section of the Buhono site, I found the fo
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 2:18 pm, Lists wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The system here is getting heaps of variations of this night of pleasure
> spam. Some is getting stopped by spamassassin but still quite a bit
> getting through.
> Here is an example of one that only scored low.
> http://www.pastebin
Has anyone else seen this? I'm trying to find out from the new author whether
it will work with SA. I would think that a new plug-in would have to be
written?
"With great pleasure I present to you the long discussed, wanted & now
finished new version of PYZOR now dubbed "Bohuno". And for those
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 09:14 +1100, Sam Ami wrote:
> hi all
>
> our current setup.
> primary mx for all out email domains installation: qmail,spamassasin,clamav
> all email is inline scanned and then relayed to the internal server
> for delivery to users mailbox
>
> question.
> is it possible to u
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Sam Ami wrote:
primary mx for all out email domains installation:
qmail,spamassasin,clamav all email is inline scanned and then relayed to
the internal server for delivery to users mailbox
question.
is it possible to use sa-learn in this situtation ?
we still get a lot of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/26/2008 04:14 PM, Sam Ami wrote:
> hi all
>
> our current setup.
> primary mx for all out email domains installation: qmail,spamassasin,clamav
> all email is inline scanned and then relayed to the internal server
> for delivery to users mailbox
hi all
our current setup.
primary mx for all out email domains installation: qmail,spamassasin,clamav
all email is inline scanned and then relayed to the internal server
for delivery to users mailbox
question.
is it possible to use sa-learn in this situtation ?
we still get a lot of spam and i'd
Lists a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> The system here is getting heaps of variations of this night of pleasure
> spam. Some is getting stopped by spamassassin but still quite a bit
> getting through.
> Here is an example of one that only scored low.
> http://www.pastebin.ca/1267866
>
> If anybody has tim
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 09:51 +1300, Lists wrote:
> Bill Randle wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 09:37 +1300, Kate Kleinschafer wrote:
> >
> >> John Hardin wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Lists wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Here is an example of one that only scored low.
> http
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Lists wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Lists wrote:
> Here is an example of one that only scored low.
> http://www.pastebin.ca/1267866
There was some discussion on the list of spaces.live.com URI spam a few
weeks back, and some rules posted. Those might
Bill Randle wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 09:37 +1300, Kate Kleinschafer wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Lists wrote:
Here is an example of one that only scored low.
http://www.pastebin.ca/1267866
There was some discussion on the list of spaces.live.com U
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 12:32 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> There was some discussion on the list of spaces.live.com URI spam a few
> weeks back, and some rules posted. Those might help.
>
I've also been seeing it.
I have a similar set of spaces.live.com rules, but although one or to of
the sub-rul
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 09:37 +1300, Kate Kleinschafer wrote:
> John Hardin wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Lists wrote:
> >
> >> Here is an example of one that only scored low.
> >> http://www.pastebin.ca/1267866
> >
> > There was some discussion on the list of spaces.live.com URI spam a
> > few we
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Lists wrote:
Here is an example of one that only scored low.
http://www.pastebin.ca/1267866
There was some discussion on the list of spaces.live.com URI spam a
few weeks back, and some rules posted. Those might help.
Can you post a link to this t
DAve wrote:
Lists wrote:
Hi all,
The system here is getting heaps of variations of this night of
pleasure spam. Some is getting stopped by spamassassin but still
quite a bit getting through.
Here is an example of one that only scored low.
http://www.pastebin.ca/1267866
If anybody has time
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Lists wrote:
Here is an example of one that only scored low.
http://www.pastebin.ca/1267866
There was some discussion on the list of spaces.live.com URI spam a
few weeks back, and some rules posted. Those might help.
Thanks I will check that out.
K
Lists wrote:
Hi all,
The system here is getting heaps of variations of this night of pleasure
spam. Some is getting stopped by spamassassin but still quite a bit
getting through.
Here is an example of one that only scored low.
http://www.pastebin.ca/1267866
If anybody has time to run it thro
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Lists wrote:
Here is an example of one that only scored low.
http://www.pastebin.ca/1267866
There was some discussion on the list of spaces.live.com URI spam a few
weeks back, and some rules posted. Those might help.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.
Hi all,
The system here is getting heaps of variations of this night of pleasure
spam. Some is getting stopped by spamassassin but still quite a bit
getting through.
Here is an example of one that only scored low.
http://www.pastebin.ca/1267866
If anybody has time to run it through their syst
Thank you all for your (quick) answers!
@Kai: mailwatch has a training facility built in. But this is only possible
on messages in quarantine. If a message is passed by mailscanner (for
example, because of BAYES_00, which is sometimes the case), it is sent to
the mailbox server, and it's not possib
22 matches
Mail list logo
