DAve wrote:
Lists wrote:
Hi all,
The system here is getting heaps of variations of this night of
pleasure spam. Some is getting stopped by spamassassin but still
quite a bit getting through.
Here is an example of one that only scored low.
http://www.pastebin.ca/1267866
If anybody has time to run it through their system and tell me what t
hit on for them - or if someone knows a ruleset that I could
implement to better stop these it would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Kate
Content analysis details: (5.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
1.9 KAM_THEBAT Abused X-Mailer Header for The Bat! MUA
2.0 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
[200.219.72.83 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
1.0 RCVD_IN_BRBL RBL: Received via relay listed in
Barracuda RBL [200.219.72.83 listed
in b.barracudacentral.org]
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable
relay lines
0.4 URI_HEX URI: URI hostname has long hexadecimal
sequence
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.4989]
0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host
with no rDNS
Looks like it would have been close for us as well. Bayes would get it
after a few hits I think.
DAve
Interesting - will keep training against them then (for bayes)
Thanks for your results Dave.
Kate
