Lists wrote:
Hi all,

The system here is getting heaps of variations of this night of pleasure spam. Some is getting stopped by spamassassin but still quite a bit getting through.
Here is an example of one that only scored low.
http://www.pastebin.ca/1267866

If anybody has time to run it through their system and tell me what t hit on for them - or if someone knows a ruleset that I could implement to better stop these it would be much appreciated.

Thanks
Kate



Content analysis details:   (5.4 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.9 KAM_THEBAT             Abused X-Mailer Header for The Bat! MUA
 2.0 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
                            [200.219.72.83 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
1.0 RCVD_IN_BRBL RBL: Received via relay listed in Barracuda RBL [200.219.72.83 listed in b.barracudacentral.org] 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
 0.4 URI_HEX                URI: URI hostname has long hexadecimal sequence
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
                            [score: 0.4989]
0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS

Looks like it would have been close for us as well. Bayes would get it after a few hits I think.

DAve

--
The whole internet thing is sucking the life out of me,
there ain't no pony in there.

Reply via email to