On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:52:09PM -0500, Don Ireland wrote:
> When I look at the message source, the following is among them--this is
> actually from YOUR reply.
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6
> X-Spam-Score: -65
> X-Spam-Bar: --
In a standard config, X-Spam-Status has a lot more infor
When I look at the message source, the following is among them--this is
actually from YOUR reply.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6
X-Spam-Score: -65
X-Spam-Bar: --
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:22:00PM -0500, Don Ireland wrote:
When looking at the headers that SA p
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:22:00PM -0500, Don Ireland wrote:
> When looking at the headers that SA puts in my messages, what's the diff
> between BARS and SCORE?
It depends, what are you talking about? :)
Do you have X-Spam-BARS and X-Spam-SCORE as headers? If so, you need to
figure out what t
When looking at the headers that SA puts in my messages, what's the diff
between BARS and SCORE?
TIA!
Don Ireland
It runs as kolab-r, same as when I set up the cron job.
--Paul
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Paul Douglas Franklin of Yakima UGM wrote:
Sure enough, there is no such directory as /kolab/.spamassassin.
I don't know what needs repairing or how to do it.
--Paul
The first thing to do is to make sur
Paul Douglas Franklin of Yakima UGM wrote:
> Yes, I almost mentioned that the first time.
> But I just discovered something: sa-learn is no longer learning. It
> was last I had checked, but when I attempted to dump the statistics
> just now, it gave me an error message:
> bayes: expire_old_tokens
Thanks. I have actually been writing rules for about 3 months now. The
WritingRules wiki is most helpful. So far, only a couple of the rules
have been problematic; I rarely have false positives. I can add similar
rules for the from header--that's the one I would like the rules to
apply to.
Yes, I almost mentioned that the first time.
But I just discovered something: sa-learn is no longer learning. It
was last I had checked, but when I attempted to dump the statistics just
now, it gave me an error message:
bayes: expire_old_tokens: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile
/
Paul Douglas Franklin of Yakima UGM wrote:
> I have noticed that spammers are putting dead giveaways into some of
> the headers which are not checked with the body rules. Specifically,
> I received an email with a sender name that was obviously spam. I hit
> reply so that the sender name was repl
Paul Douglas Franklin of Union Gospel Mission wrote:
>
> SA is marvelous! I installed Kolab last summer and have been using SA
> to greatly cut down on spam. (It is filtering out about 5,500 e-mails
> per week for our organization.) I'm not sure which version of SA
> Kolab uses, but I believe i
Paul Douglas Franklin of Union Gospel Mission escribió:
I'm the only one in the organization whose system is configured to
input into the SA bayesian filter, and I faithfully send those
messages which I have marked in Thunderbird as junk to the spam
learning folder for SA. Nonetheless, SA cont
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
thx for your answer.
The SA Version is 3.2.3
You are right, we are using postfix.
For SA there is an entry in the master.cf of postfix:
filterunix - n n - - pipe
user=filter argv=/home/filter/sc/filter.sh -f ${sender} --
${rec
I have noticed that spammers are putting dead giveaways into some of the
headers which are not checked with the body rules. Specifically, I
received an email with a sender name that was obviously spam. I hit
reply so that the sender name was replicated in the body and then
changed the to: bac
SA is marvelous! I installed Kolab last summer and have been using SA
to greatly cut down on spam. (It is filtering out about 5,500 e-mails
per week for our organization.) I'm not sure which version of SA Kolab
uses, but I believe it is 3.0.x
Lately I have been writing quite a few rules to tr
Justin Mason wrote:
I've been thinking about this. It might be useful to offer a plugin
implementing this hashcash, since it'd offer a good way to come up
with an unforgeable FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK rule.
However, we'd have to be sure that the CSRI algorithm really is
sufficiently open, and not paten
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 05:02:46PM +0100, Paolo Cravero wrote:
> Arthur Dent wrote:
>
>> Learned tokens from 8 message(s) (3165 message(s) examined)
>> Learned tokens from 4628 message(s) (8703 message(s) examined)
>> Learned tokens from 3890 message(s) (8634 message(s) examined)
>> Learned tokens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, now after reading the whole INSTALL file, I come to the conclusion
that to upgrade, one just acts like one never installed SpamAssassin
in the first place, and apparently the new SpamAssassin will just
install on top of the old one (with cruft surely accumulating in t
Arthur Dent wrote:
Learned tokens from 8 message(s) (3165 message(s) examined)
Learned tokens from 4628 message(s) (8703 message(s) examined)
Learned tokens from 3890 message(s) (8634 message(s) examined)
Learned tokens from 2264 message(s) (8671 message(s) examined)
Learned tokens from 2303 mes
try
meta WEBTENT_LB LONGWORDS && (BAYES_50 || BAYES_60 || BAYES_80 ||
BAYES_95 || BAYES_99)
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Fitzpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 February 2008 15:09
> To:
Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong here?
meta WEBTENT_LB __LONGWORDS && (__BAYES_50 || __BAYES_60 || __BAYES_80 ||
__BAYES_95 || __BAYES_99)
describe WEBTENT_LB Contains long words and Bayesian spam probability of 50% or
higher
score WEBTENT_LB 3.5
While my messages hit both LONGWORDS an
I've been thinking about this. It might be useful to offer a plugin
implementing this hashcash, since it'd offer a good way to come up
with an unforgeable FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK rule.
However, we'd have to be sure that the CSRI algorithm really is
sufficiently open, and not patent-encumbered, since
Hi
thx for your answer.
The SA Version is 3.2.3
You are right, we are using postfix.
For SA there is an entry in the master.cf of postfix:
filterunix - n n - - pipe
user=filter argv=/home/filter/sc/filter.sh -f ${sender} --
${recipient}
The filter.sh:
#!
Well, in fairness, it's probably not sa-learn that's causing the weirdness but
my setup. I don't understand what's causing the problem however. Allow me to
explain...
I have a nightly cron job that runs a script to do sa-learning. Learning spam
is no problem, it's all in one mail folder (2 actuall
David Hobley wrote:
All,
I have been trying to work out what is the core issue here, but I am
still stumped. Can anyone offer any suggestions?
Yes, the code for japan in ok_locales and ok_languages is ja, not jp.
Your current setting essentially boils down to English only.
All,
I have been trying to work out what is the core issue here, but I am still
stumped. Can anyone offer any suggestions?
Cheers,
David
- Original Message -
From: "David Hobley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2008 02:30:45 PM (GMT
mouss wrote:
- The x-cr-hashedpuzzle header contains the recipients. There is a
serious privacy issue.
- the algorithm isn't open. If every company starts adding proprietary
headers, we will no more have a place for the body.
Followup: I've recently discovered that both of these are non-issu
> >> http://www.openspf.org/caller-id/csri.pdf Chapter 11, pages 37 to 45
> >> inclusive
On 05.02.08 15:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> interesting reading :) I believe that, in a time where zombie armies
> powered by quad-core cpus pour spam over the internet, compute-bound
> puzzles would not rea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
i need help with Spamassassin. Once in a month we have to send a
massive amount of mails at the same time. These are Invoice mails to
our customers.
The problem is, that spamd controls all these mails, which are send
from a different Server in our network. It happ
Hi
i need help with Spamassassin. Once in a month we have to send a massive
amount of mails at the same time. These are Invoice mails to our
customers.
The problem is, that spamd controls all these mails, which are send from a
different Server in our network. It happens that 1/4 of this mails
29 matches
Mail list logo
