Thanks Alex, procmail filter works fine!
As soon as procmail moves the first spam into one of the imap spam
folders, that folder is automatically created. It should then immediately
be available in squirrelmail
This don't work, If create a spam folder with squirrelmail (options,
folders) than
What's a
"sa-learn --dump magic" output look like?
# sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db
version
0.000 0297 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 982365 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0
* Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071119 14:13]:
>
> Micah Anderson writes:
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071119 10:01]:
> > > N> PS: I post to this list using gmane. Is it possible to stop delivery
> > > N> on my email address so that I can post but I do not receive the list
> >
On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 17:48 +0100, Stefan Walk wrote:
> Thanks. But it seems spamassassin -d only removes the markup that "my"
> spamassassin did, not those from others (they mangle the headers too, it's
> X-TUD-HRZ-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> X-TUD-HRZ-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whiteli
Hello,
I recently upgraded spamassassin to version 3.2.3 and since then (or at least
very close to that upgrade) sa-learn consumes more memory than I have in my
server and gets into swap space first almost stops and then dies sooner or
later.
Has anybody else observed something similar? I saw
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:21:12AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>>> machines. Is there a way to detect (in ways of a script) that a mail has
>>> been
>>> processed by report safe, or yet better, a done way to undo it? I've heard
>>> sa-learn does it, so i'd
Hi Jason,
I do this manually, but we are a small outfit and I don't process all
that much SPAM (or HAM).
I simply open up my SPAM public folder with mutt, review the messages'
subjects to make sure no one goofed when they put in the SPAM public
folder, then tag it and save it to an mbox. To open
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Oh, also, if mails are coming in w/ "X-Spam-Status: Yes" or whatever,
> you could always choose to just block those mails via the MTA/etc.
>
> IMO, if someone else is telling you that the mail is spam, why bother
> accepting it?
>
Because i don't trust the other servers
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 17:59:39 Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Well, yes and no. "-d" only removed 1 level of encapsulation. If you have
> a multiply-encapsulated message, you need to run the unencapsulator
> multiple times. :)
>
> As far as your markup versus their markup ... It generally should
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 05:48:36PM +0100, Stefan Walk wrote:
> > "spamassassin -d"
> >
> Thanks. But it seems spamassassin -d only removes the markup that "my"
> spamassassin did, not those from others (they mangle the headers too, it's
Well, yes and no. "-d" only removed 1 level of encapsulat
Sent before with the wrong from address ... sorry if this comes through
twice.
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:21:12AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>>> machines. Is there a way to detect (in ways of a script) that a mail has
>>> been
>>> processed by report safe,
I totally agree. You could not be more right!! ;)
Best Regards,
Jason Holbrook
Chief Technology Integrator / Partner
Empower Information Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
weblog.empoweris.com
www.empoweris.com
Skype: holbrook.jason
Gtalk: jaholbrook
757-320-2667 (Direct)
757-273-9399 (office)
757-715-1944
In that case once you've got you spam corpus going I'd let it autolearn and
little else..students may send the 'maybe spam' to the wrong box deliberately
to cause 'fun'.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> Fro
Jeff:
Thanks. That looks promising, I do not use mutt but that gets me pretty
close. My biggest issue is incoming I process the mail on my sa |
postfix | etc setup but on the way out I let exchange handle the
traffic. I have no path from my exchange server back to my sa solution.
I am finding that
No problem, I just want to conserve as much memory space as possible so as to
avaiod Disk Swapping.
-Grant
- Original Message -
From: sokka
To: Matt Kettler
Cc: Grant Peel ; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: spamd memory u
Morvan Daniel Müller schrieb am 20.11.2007 13:49:
How I say to postfix to direct subject=[SPAM ] xx (mark by
spamassassin) to ~home\mail\SPAM (imap folder)
I'm using Mailbox no Maildir. Postfix deliver to /var/mail/$user and
Dovecot read from mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
Grant,
Let us know what is your problem with spamd?
regards
On Nov 20, 2007 8:36 PM, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Grant Peel wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > What might one do to lessen the memory load for each of the spamd
> > processes?
>
> 1) Reduce the number of rules you are runni
Grant Peel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What might one do to lessen the memory load for each of the spamd
> processes?
1) Reduce the number of rules you are running. Particularly watch out
for absurd rulesets like sa-blacklist.
2) disable plugins, starting with ones you don't use.
Hi all,
What might one do to lessen the memory load for each of the spamd processes?
-Grant
How I say to postfix to direct subject=[SPAM ] xx (mark by spamassassin) to
~home\mail\SPAM (imap folder)
I'm using Mailbox no Maildir. Postfix deliver to /var/mail/$user and Dovecot
read from mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
I read about using scripts in procmail/dropmail (t
Hi,
I have spamassasin version 3.2.3 running on Perl version 5.8.8
operating system FreeBSD, working with user on Vpopmail. I have to
configure the database bayes to use a bank for each user and the bank is
in the user's home in Vpopmail. Also need a script to run the sa-learn
in the home of ea
Thanks guys for your responses. I am looking at spam and ham boxes on
the exchange server and scripts that will fetch the messages.
I also agree the messages must be moved and not forwarded.
Best Regards,
Jason Holbrook
Chief Technology Integrator / Partner
Empower Information Systems
[EMAIL PROT
On 20.11.07 09:12, Martin.Hepworth wrote:
> Yes - very easily. You need a spam and ham folder on the ms-exch box that
> can be accessed via imap.
>
> Then there are many perl scripts etc you can run on the mailscanner
> gateway machine that will grab the email and feed it into sa-learn.
>
> NB us
Jason
Yes - very easily. You need a spam and ham folder on the ms-exch box that can
be accessed via imap.
Then there are many perl scripts etc you can run on the mailscanner gateway
machine that will grab the email and feed it into sa-learn.
NB users need to move not copy emails for training o
24 matches
Mail list logo
