Now I using SA 3.1.7. How to update the higher versions. Please help me.
--
Sg
Hi Sg,
Um if you are using CentOS just do this
Backup your /etc/mail/spamassassin directory and all of it's file contents,
mainly for safety and good admin work protection
Then if you have
Hi
How to upgrage 3.1.7 to 3.2.x. Please help me.
--
Sg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had posted before, but we couldn't figure out what was adding 3+
seconds processing time after I upgraded from SA 3.2.1 to 3.2.2.
It's the following plugin. I have tested loading and commenting out the
plugin - it's the culprit. SA 3.2.2 automatically adds several
Hi
Now I using SA 3.1.7. How to update the higher versions. Please help me.
--
Sg
Thanks - I understand. I was just showing the section of the *.pre file
that showed the plugin.
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Leisi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 8:43 PM
To: Dawson, Donald
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Performance prob
Hello,
I hope I'm doing this right. I'm trying to install an SA required
module, Net::DNS, and it fails one of the tests.
Running "make test" I see the following:
t/10-recurse...1..12
ok 1 - use Net::DNS::Resolver::Recurse;
ok 2 - The object isa Net::DNS::Resolver::Recurse
ok 3 -
At 17:53 09-08-2007, missymiss21 wrote:
LOL, I did ask him, and he said that other employees get over 500 spams a
day. He pretty much brushed me off :-(
That's a significant amount of spam. If he won't help you, there
isn't much you can do.
SpamAssassin only runs tests to determine whether
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> It's the following plugin. I have tested loading and commenting out the
> plugin - it's the culprit. SA 3.2.2 automatically adds several plugins
> automatically.
>
> # ASN - Look up the Autonomous System Number of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CharlesLai schrieb:
> Just copy the PDFInfo.pm plugin into the default directory for Spamassassin
> plugins:
>
> sudo cp /downloads/pdfinfo/PDFInfo.pm
> /Library/Perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/
Remember that putting your custom plugins ther
At 05:34 PM 8/9/2007, Evan Platt wrote:
Can we remove nabble from allowing their users to post?
Following up to my own post...
December 1st, 2006. And I see posts from me are still being archived.
From: "Nabble Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL P
Please reply to the list, not to me.
Well, if you don't know 'whatever the mail client is' then how should we?
If your filters in say Outlook aren't working, that's a question for
an outlook forum, not for spamassassin. Spamassassin doesn't block or
move messages to other folders.
At 05:40 P
LOL, I did ask him, and he said that other employees get over 500 spams a
day. He pretty much brushed me off :-(
Jim Knuth wrote:
>
> Heute (10.08.2007/02:28 Uhr) schrieb missymiss21,
>
>> Hi, I am not really all that computer-savvy, but I just started a new job
>> and
>> got a new email addr
In an older episode (Friday, 10. August 2007), John D. Hardin wrote:
> > uri LOCAL_EMAILDOTINFO /[EMAIL PROTECTED],50}\.info$/
>
> "uri" also picks up bare email addresses in the message body?
It does it here when I run SA on an mbox file with only Charles' mail in
it.
>
> Or does that only work
Heute (10.08.2007/02:28 Uhr) schrieb missymiss21,
> Hi, I am not really all that computer-savvy, but I just started a new job and
> got a new email address that gets hundreds of SPAM a day... so I started
> fiddling around with the filter rules. Clearly, SpamAssassin knows it's
> spam, because the
missymiss21 wrote:
> Hi, I am not really all that computer-savvy, but I just started a new job and
> got a new email address that gets hundreds of SPAM a day... so I started
> fiddling around with the filter rules. Clearly, SpamAssassin knows it's
> spam, because the subject always has "***SPAM
At 05:28 PM 8/9/2007, missymiss21 wrote:
Hi, I am not really all that computer-savvy, but I just started a new job and
got a new email address that gets hundreds of SPAM a day... so I started
fiddling around with the filter rules. Clearly, SpamAssassin knows it's
spam, because the subject always
Hi, I am not really all that computer-savvy, but I just started a new job and
got a new email address that gets hundreds of SPAM a day... so I started
fiddling around with the filter rules. Clearly, SpamAssassin knows it's
spam, because the subject always has "***SPAM" at the beginning of it.
> I had posted before, but we couldn't figure out what was adding 3+
> seconds processing time after I upgraded from SA 3.2.1 to 3.2.2.
>
> It's the following plugin. I have tested loading and commenting out
> the plugin - it's the culprit. SA 3.2.2 automatically adds several
> plugins automatic
I had posted before, but we couldn't figure out what was adding 3+
seconds processing time after I upgraded from SA 3.2.1 to 3.2.2.
It's the following plugin. I have tested loading and commenting out the
plugin - it's the culprit. SA 3.2.2 automatically adds several plugins
automatically.
# ASN
I bypassed the 3.2.2 due to some issues, but have submitted the
following patch to Freebsd ports to upgrade SA port for 3.2.1 to 3.2.3.
A couple minor dependency fixes and DomainKey plugin fix (for new
installs)
You can read more and download patch here:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?p
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, wolfgang wrote:
> To catch an email address in an *.info domain, try this rule:
>
> uri LOCAL_EMAILDOTINFO /[EMAIL PROTECTED],50}\.info$/
"uri" also picks up bare email addresses in the message body?
Or does that only work with mailto: URIs?
> Correct me if I am wrong, exp
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 12:57:11PM +0200, Michael Worobcuk wrote:
> I am using Spamassassin and Vexim.
> In the Vexim Interface I can adjust the values :
>
> - SpamAssassin tag score
> - SpamAssassin refuse score
>
> What is the difference between the values "refuse score" and the
> "required s
Hi,
I am using Spamassassin and Vexim.
In the Vexim Interface I can adjust the values :
- SpamAssassin tag score
- SpamAssassin refuse score
and in the Spamassassin userprefs-table I can insert a value for the
required score.
What is the difference between the values "refuse score" and the
Ed Kasky writes:
> http://apache.mirrors.redwire.net/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.3.tar.gz
>
> worked as well...
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update=200708092033
will load an updated, nearby mirror. That's the best way to do it.
--j.
To catch an email address in an *.info domain, try this rule:
uri LOCAL_EMAILDOTINFO /[EMAIL PROTECTED],50}\.info$/
Afaik, using uri instead of body has the advantage that it will only
parse URIs, not the entire body ... thus info is anchored at the end of
the regex.
Correct me if I am wrong,
At 01:36 PM Thursday, 8/9/2007, Rick Macdougall wrote -=>
Robert - eLists wrote:
Check in a day or so.
Last time there was a release update someone posted a good link that I
cannot find in the list archives quite yet.
Someone please feel free to repost.
Thanks!
- rh
I just downloaded it from
Justin Mason wrote on Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:38:51 +0100:
> Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.3
everything fine. spamd_allow_user_rules test works now.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
SpamAssassin v3.2.3, Perl 5.8.8, Solaris 9
What would cause this error?
t/spamd_hup.ok 1/110# Failed test 5 in t/spamd_hup.t
at line 40
# t/spamd_hup.t line 40 is: ok (-e $pid_file) or warn "$pid_file does
not exist post restart";
log/spamd.pid does not exist post r
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > After running sa-compile and un-commenting the plugin, everything
> > seems to be working. There are no lint errors and it is scoring
> > mail. But when I look in the logs, I noticed some errors like this:
> >
> > Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/Compi
Robert - eLists wrote:
Check in a day or so.
Last time there was a release update someone posted a good link that I
cannot find in the list archives quite yet.
Someone please feel free to repost.
Thanks!
- rh
I just downloaded it from here.
http://apache.mirror.rafal.ca/spamassassin/so
>
> Check in a day or so.
>
Last time there was a release update someone posted a good link that I
cannot find in the list archives quite yet.
Someone please feel free to repost.
Thanks!
- rh
At 01:17 PM 8/9/2007, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
I don't see it. How long does it take to get to the mirrors?
Check in a day or so.
--
Jerry Durand, Durand Interstellar, Inc. www.interstellar.com
tel: +1 408 356-3886, USA toll free: 1 866 356-3886
Skype: jerrydurand
I don't see it. How long does it take to get to the mirrors?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Mason
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 3:39 PM
> To: users@SpamAssassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.3 is now available! This is a maintenance
release of the 3.2.x branch.
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi
The release file will also be available via CPAN in the near future.
md5sum of archive files:
e9a5fd94dead0fca3f26fb3fe
Is there a complete discussion of using sa-update and sa-compile
(and whatever else is necessary) somewhere. This looks like the
way to go, but I would need either
(a) a working script to do the dirty work
(b) a description of HOW do do it.
--
Reg
> Could someone help me with a SA body rule that would
> catch the email below? These are the only ones
> consistently getting past SA, and they always have an
> email address with a .info domain. I’d like the rule to
> catch any message with an [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain since we have
> no one legit
Can't help there, but in my case I'd say 100% of the time that my email id
appears anywhere in the subject it is spam. That would be fairly easy to check
for, but I don't know what the FP rate would be for other people with email ids
like "will" or similar.
Loren
- Original Messa
I installed PDFInfo on our Mac OS X Server, and here’s what worked for me:
Just copy the PDFInfo.pm plugin into the default directory for Spamassassin
plugins:
sudo cp /downloads/pdfinfo/PDFInfo.pm
/Library/Perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/
(I had the plugin in the /downloads/pdfinfo direc
I've noticed that in 99% of cases where the subject line starts with a
first name, the email is spam. The only way I can think to check for
this, though is to keep a large database of common first names and check
against it. Can anyone suggest a way to implement this that wouldn't
slow SpamAssass
Could someone help me with a SA body rule that would catch the email below?
These are the only ones consistently getting past SA, and they always have
an email address with a .info domain. I’d like the rule to catch any message
with an [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain since we have no one legitimate that
What are the errors?
Bowie
Netdynamix wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thank you for the CF.
> The problem is that once I have dropped it into /etc/mail/spamassassin
> and when I run spamassassin --lint
>
> It drops quite a few errors.
>
> And the eCard Spam keeps coming through :(
>
> Am I doing someth
Hi John,
Thank you for the CF.
The problem is that once I have dropped it into /etc/mail/spamassassin
and when I run spamassassin --lint
It drops quite a few errors.
And the eCard Spam keeps coming through :(
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks in advance,
Chris
Maybe you got garbage in you
Hi John,
Thank you for the CF.
The problem is that once I have dropped it into /etc/mail/spamassassin
and when I run spamassassin --lint
It drops quite a few errors.
And the eCard Spam keeps coming through :(
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks in advance,
Chris
John D. Hardin wrote:
>
> On
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > Rick Zeman wrote:
> > > ... but doesn't indicate that
> > > anything else needs to be done. Is it really that easy?
> >
> > I would do it this way:
> >
> > - Drop the rule file in /etc/mail/spamassassin
> > - Run "spamassassin --lint" to check f
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Mark Sansome wrote:
> But this looks wrong...:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su wifey
> Password:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mark]$ ls -l $MAIL
> -rw-rw 1 mark mail 4020 Aug 7 17:11 /var/spool/mail/mark
"su" (vs. "su -") does not completely change the user environment.
Try "su - wi
thank for all answer excuse for my bad english o(-_-)o
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/I-need-descritpion-of-all-rule-tf4242326.html#a12071789
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sasori_no_Suna wrote:
> hello where can I get descript of all rule? thank you
>
There's no detailed, concise reference of every rule.
If you just need some basic info, most of the tests have had their short
descriptions put into a table form at:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests.html
Other
>hello where can I get descript of all rule? thank you
read the source.
Seriously. Since it is trivial to customize any particular instance of
spamassassin, the only way to ensure that you know what the precise rules will
be is to look at the source and configuration files for a particular
in
hello where can I get descript of all rule? thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/I-need-descritpion-of-all-rule-tf4242326.html#a12071553
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I've been running spamassassin along with a bayes setup for (literally)
years on the same server. I'm using a MySQL backend that appears to be
working wonderfully. However, I have been seeing a lot of the same spam
over and over, even after having bayes learn about them. Is this normal?
Is there a
Looks like most of the pdf/xls/doc spam gets rejected at MTA level if you
use greylisting and dynamic IP rbls. So far I haven't seen any on my
private server that didn't make it thru to SA unless it got forwarded.
And I have seen only a few on the little less protected servers.
Kai
--
Kai Schä
On Thursday 09 August 2007, Mark Sansome wrote:
>On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 11:22 +0200, Gabriella Schmidt wrote:
>> You must use 'su - wifey' to change the user environment.
>
>Oooops!
>
>I appear to be having a day a writing before engaging my brain!
>
>Somebody else also pointed this out to me off-li
On Thursday 09 August 2007, Mark Sansome wrote:
>A reader of this list replied to me off-list and made this comment:
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Mark Sansome wrote:
>> > The problem is that (running procmail as root) if I follow the
>> > instructions I have found on various setup guides (including the
>
Martin.Hepworth wrote on Thu, 09 Aug 2007 08:29:32 +0100:
> go and take a long walk off a short plank...
splash :-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Broadly, Matthias' advice is correct. Here's some additions:
Matthias Leisi writes:
> > Perform DCC checks
> > Perform Pyzor checks
> > Perform Razor2 checks
>
> I don't run any of these and don't have the urge to enable them. The
> other rules (including Bayes) work fine with me.
Turning thes
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 11:22 +0200, Gabriella Schmidt wrote:
> >
> You must use 'su - wifey' to change the user environment.
>
Oooops!
I appear to be having a day a writing before engaging my brain!
Somebody else also pointed this out to me off-list...
...and indeed you're right. That of co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Diego H. schrieb:
> If anyone suggest to remove some SA plugin from v310.pre, v312.pre or
> v320.pre would be nice.
> Maybe one of this plugins is pushing the load too, If anyone recommend to
> turn it off, I would like to hear comments:
>
> Perfo
Mark Sansome wrote:
> A reader of this list replied to me off-list and made this comment:
>
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Mark Sansome wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The problem is that (running procmail as root) if I follow the
>>> instructions I have found on various setup guides (including the
>>> SA wiki)
Henrik Krohns wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 10:51:05PM +0200, Michael Schaap wrote:
Hi John,
Thanks for maintaining this excellent plugin!
But I'm just wondering if ...
On 6-Aug-2007 04:39, John Rudd wrote:
-- changed complex dsl clientword to .*dsl.*
(too many variations of 'dsl
A reader of this list replied to me off-list and made this comment:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Mark Sansome wrote:
>
> > The problem is that (running procmail as root) if I follow the
> > instructions I have found on various setup guides (including the
> > SA wiki) I am supposed to put "DROPPRIVS=yes"
Hmmm, interesting one. I would have only just blocked that one :-
Content analysis details: (8.4 points, 7.0 required)
pts rule name description
-- --
1.7 SARE_FREE_WEBM_COMWALL Maybe spammer with free emai
OK
Here's the URL for the actual message I got...(before being SA-ed or anything..
http://www.solidstatelogic.com/1IInjp-000ENd-51.txt
I'll leave this up for a couple of days and take it down after the weekend.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 8423
John
Sorry I know, I've been doing this IT thing along time and I should now better.
I'll go and take a long walk off a short plank...
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
63 matches
Mail list logo
