RE: Spamassassin 3.1.8

> I have upgraded spamassassin from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 and have a easy > quiestion, > When I look at the headers it still shows that Spamassassin 3.1.7 is > installed / running > Why is that? I did the following --> downloaded Mail-SpamassAssin- > 3.1.8.tar.gz and installed > by perl Makefile.PL /

Re: User or Admin?

One last thing. I went and found there reply to me from when I asked about SA. */The config file is $HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs You can also use a local.cf file in the .spamassassin dir. See http://spamassassin.org for more info regarding this, as our support with SA is quite limited.>>

Re: User or Admin?

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:09:49PM -0500, Don Ireland wrote: > <> > I THINK user. But that's what I was looking for confirmation on. > That's why I posted the details of the fact that I'm using a shared > hosting account. > > < to use it.>> > When I ask them anything about SA configuration, th

Re: User or Admin?

Also, I'm piping messages through a PHP script and the PHP script is passing the message to SA for scanning. If there's someway to tell SA at that time where to find the Bayes files that would help. Thanks! Don Ireland wrote: <> I THINK user. But that's what I was looking for confirmation o

Re: User or Admin?

<> I THINK user. But that's what I was looking for confirmation on. That's why I posted the details of the fact that I'm using a shared hosting account. <> Ok--so it can be configured to use MY bayesian training then. GOOD. <> Yes I am. > When I ask them anything about SA conf

Re: User or Admin?

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 07:42:54PM -0500, Don Ireland wrote: > Should I be looking at the docs written for users or for admins? Are you running SA as a user or as an admin? > If I use Bayesian filtering (I want to), will other users of my host's > system affect SA's learning? Or will it only

Re: Spamassassin 3.1.8

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:08:59PM -0600, SAtalk Mail User wrote: > stopped the current spamd and restarted and it shows that 3.1.7 in the header. I would guess that your install didn't happen correctly. Sounds like you have one version installed and probably installed 3.1.8 to a different locati

Spamassassin 3.1.8

Hello All, I have upgraded spamassassin from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 and have a easy quiestion, When I look at the headers it still shows that Spamassassin 3.1.7 is installed / running Why is that? I did the following --> downloaded Mail-SpamassAssin-3.1.8.tar.gz and installed by perl Makefile.PL / mak

Re: Spamhaus Tests

Cliff Stanford wrote: > Some questions: > > 1. RCVD_IN_XBL > > Why is this only applied by default to -lastexternal rather than all the > Received: lines? Surely if any forwarding host is a known exploit, it > should score the same 3.897 ? The problem here is that XBL will generally consist of

Re: spamd child processing timeout

On 3/2/2007 2:50 AM, Sandeep Agarwal wrote: any suggestions how to fix this or the reason for this. It's probably being caused by bayes expiries. Disable auto expiry and do the expiries via a cron job. Daryl

Re: NOTICE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available

Heute (07.03.2007/01:42 Uhr) schrieb Randal, Phil, > 127/8 is now always trusted. > Remove that "trusted_networks 127/8" line and all should be well. Are then still other changes, which are not explained in Changes or INSTALL? > Phil > -Original Message- > From: Jim Knuth [mailto:[EMAI

Re: NOTICE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available

Heute (07.03.2007/02:26 Uhr) schrieb R Lists06, >> >> 127/8 is now always trusted. >> >> Remove that "trusted_networks 127/8" line and all should be well. >> >> Phil > Are you saying we should remove the entry 127.0.0.1 from the > trusted_networks ? > What about if in the internal_networks e

RE: NOTICE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available

> > 127/8 is now always trusted. > > Remove that "trusted_networks 127/8" line and all should be well. > > Phil Are you saying we should remove the entry 127.0.0.1 from the trusted_networks ? What about if in the internal_networks entry ? Is this for 3.2.0 only or is it in 3.1.8 too? Isn't

Re: NOTICE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available

Heute (07.03.2007/01:42 Uhr) schrieb Randal, Phil, > 127/8 is now always trusted. > Remove that "trusted_networks 127/8" line and all should be well. Thank you. I have only asked because I could read nothing in the Changes. > Phil > -Original Message- > From: Jim Knuth [mailto:[EMAIL P

User or Admin?

Hello all! I have a shared hosting account. My host has Exim installed as the mail server and has SA installed. I have three domains (1 for personal use and 2 for small businesses--one man operations). Should I be looking at the docs written for users or for admins? If I use Bayesian f

RE: NOTICE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available

127/8 is now always trusted. Remove that "trusted_networks 127/8" line and all should be well. Phil -Original Message- From: Jim Knuth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 March 2007 00:12 To: Justin Mason Cc: dev@spamassassin.apache.org; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: NOTICE:

Re: NOTICE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available

Gestern (06.03.2007/15:09 Uhr) schrieb Justin Mason, > SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 is released! > This is a *prerelease* of SpamAssassin 3.2.0; not the full release. Actual there a little bit changed with trusted network? My local.cf included # Trusted clear_trusted_networks trusted_networks 127/8

Re: domain has been refused (why?)

On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Peter wrote: > I have a client who complains that one of their own clients cannot > send mail to them. The sender has performed a simple SMTP > transmission and receives the following error: > > SMTP Error 4570: > Illegal response to the sender(550): > 550 5.7.1 H:MXB<>Connec

Re: domain has been refused (why?)

Peter wrote: I have a client who complains that one of their own clients cannot send mail to them. The sender has performed a simple SMTP transmission and receives the following error: SMTP Error 4570: Illegal response to the sender(550): 550 5.7.1 H:MXB<>Connection refused to due abuse I re

domain has been refused (why?)

I have a client who complains that one of their own clients cannot send mail to them. The sender has performed a simple SMTP transmission and receives the following error: SMTP Error 4570: Illegal response to the sender(550): 550 5.7.1 H:MXB<>Connection refused to due abuse I realize this is a

Re: NOTICE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available

Mark Martinec writes: > > SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 is released! > > This is a *prerelease* of SpamAssassin 3.2.0; not the full release. > > Looks fine, runs also under amavisd-new cleanly > > (after having to remove some stale rule scores > in my local.cf of course to make a --lint happy). > > A

Re: NOTICE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available

> SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 is released! > This is a *prerelease* of SpamAssassin 3.2.0; not the full release. Looks fine, runs also under amavisd-new cleanly (after having to remove some stale rule scores in my local.cf of course to make a --lint happy). An updated DKIM plugin patch is now in the

Re: How to whitelist mail lists?

Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: > OK, but the point is that I run SA trough AMaViS, so procmail recipes > aren't the answer. Thanks a lot, I suppose I should create some type of > whitelist in AMaViS to avoid SA. Yes an example for bypass THIS list with amavisd, I've postet here in Feb. 06 search the ar

[OT] How to deal with SPF_FAIL ?

I was thinking about adding spf checking support directly in the MTA. This would allow messages that fail spf to be instantly blocked. However, I noticed that many maillists (sourceforge's ones included) set the MAIL FROM to the original sender address. If the senders domain is spf enabled, it wil

Re: How to whitelist mail lists?

On Mar 6, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: OK, but the point is that I run SA trough AMaViS, so procmail recipes aren't the answer. Thanks a lot, I suppose I should create some type of whitelist in AMaViS to avoid SA. amavisd-new has several whitelisting options. first you ha

[Fwd: Re: *****POSIBLE SPAM***** Re: Annoying stocks scams]

please suspend this users mailing list account --- Begin Message --- Mensaje Automatico *** Este usuario no se encuentra operativo, para cualquier asunto le ruego se pongan en contacto con Leandro Gayango [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

Re: PNG graphics

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:29:47PM -0600, bryan haase wrote: > Does anyone have a rule for a message that contains PNG graphics either > inline or attached? How are those different? -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "Meanwhile the US military officials are looking for their next target in the war

PNG graphics

Does anyone have a rule for a message that contains PNG graphics either inline or attached? Thanks Bryan - This email transmission and any documents, files or previous email messages attached to it may contain information that is confidentia

Re: Annoying stocks scams

On 3/6/2007 5:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It's my first meta rule, which only gives a score if both conditions are > true, and I was wondering if there's a possibility to make the score more > "intelligent" : my local rules use combinations. any message that hits AT LEAST one rule gets t

Re: Not Enough Points

David Goldsmith wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Maul wrote: David Goldsmith wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here is how this message scored: X-Spam-DCC: PacNet-SG: iceman11.giac.net 1358; Body=65 Fuz1=65 Fuz2=51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssass

Re: Not Enough Points

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Maul wrote: > David Goldsmith wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Here is how this message scored: >> >> X-Spam-DCC: PacNet-SG: iceman11.giac.net 1358; Body=65 Fuz1=65 Fuz2=51 >> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1

Re: Spamassassin filter files? / Oh, i forgot

No i don't have qmail-scanner installed... I wish to use http://untroubled.org/qmail-qfilter/ Anyone has any experience witht qmail-qfilter? Thanks. Mário Gamito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: You have to have qmail-scanner installed. I suppose you do. -- Mário Gamito Mário Gamito wro

Re: Not Enough Points

David Goldsmith wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here is how this message scored: X-Spam-DCC: PacNet-SG: iceman11.giac.net 1358; Body=65 Fuz1=65 Fuz2=51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on iceman11.giac.net X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.

Re: [2] auto-learn learned_points

Thanks for the reply, but I think that you are referring to autolearn_points. As computed in PerMsgStatus.pm and is used in AutoLearningThreshold.pm. They are computed in the same function but they are not the same. Notice that in the get_autolearn_points autolearn_points is $score where learned

Not Enough Points

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here is how this message scored: X-Spam-DCC: PacNet-SG: iceman11.giac.net 1358; Body=65 Fuz1=65 Fuz2=51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on iceman11.giac.net X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYE

Spamhaus Tests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Some questions: 1. RCVD_IN_XBL Why is this only applied by default to -lastexternal rather than all the Received: lines? Surely if any forwarding host is a known exploit, it should score the same 3.897 ? 2. RCVD_IN_PBL This is (IMHO) correctly

Re: Bayes and Upgrade

R Lists06 writes: > > No. Especially not for a maintenance release upgrade > > (major.minor.maintenance). > > Hm > > Will we need to retrain for the upcoming 3.2.0 ? > > Im not sure if that is considered "major" or not it's pretty major, but retraining won't be required. Don't worry; if

Re: auto-learn learned_points

ram01 wrote: > "auto-learn? no: scored as spam but learner indicated ham" > is given if if ($learned_points < $learner_said_ham_points)where > $learner_said_ham_points = -1.0 > > what exactly is learned_points > It is a recalculation of the message score, based on the following changes from

RE: Bayes and Upgrade

> F: Theo Van Dinter > No. Especially not for a maintenance release upgrade > (major.minor.maintenance). Hm Will we need to retrain for the upcoming 3.2.0 ? Im not sure if that is considered "major" or not -- Robert - Abba Communications http://www.abbacomm.net/

Re: Bayes and Upgrade

Heute (06.03.2007/16:49 Uhr) schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED], > Like many.I am a Noob to SpamAssasin. I just upgraded to 3.1.8 (first time > performing an upgrade and all went well) and have a simple question I was > unable to find an answer to on the website: > > Do I need to retrain Bayes after a

Re: Bayes and Upgrade

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:49:28AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Like many.I am a Noob to SpamAssasin. I just upgraded to 3.1.8 (first time > performing an upgrade and all went well) and have a simple question I was > unable to find an answer to on the website: > > Do I need to retrain Bayes a

Bayes and Upgrade

Like many.I am a Noob to SpamAssasin. I just upgraded to 3.1.8 (first time performing an upgrade and all went well) and have a simple question I was unable to find an answer to on the website: Do I need to retrain Bayes after a version Upgrade? Version: Upgraded 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 Platform: Wi

Re: How to whitelist mail lists?

OK, but the point is that I run SA trough AMaViS, so procmail recipes aren't the answer. Thanks a lot, I suppose I should create some type of whitelist in AMaViS to avoid SA. Luis 2007/3/6, David Goldsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Luis Hernán Otegui

Re: Annoying stocks scams

Rick Cooper wrote: Sorry to mess up the thread, I lost the original -Original Message- From: Dhawal Doshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 9:39 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Annoying stocks scams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi List! [ ... ]

RE: Annoying stocks scams

Sorry to mess up the thread, I lost the original > -Original Message- > From: Dhawal Doshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 9:39 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Annoying stocks scams > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi List! > > [ ... ] >

Re: How to whitelist mail lists?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: > Hi, several of my users have mail lists (such as Yahoo ones, or some > other, at elsevier.com , or other scientific > publications). > I've been searching the web, trying to find a way to whitelist the >

How to whitelist mail lists?

Hi, several of my users have mail lists (such as Yahoo ones, or some other, at elsevier.com, or other scientific publications). I've been searching the web, trying to find a way to whitelist the messages from these lists. Could anyone point me some directions? Thanks in advance, Luis -- --

Re: Annoying stocks scams

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi List! I'm getting hit by a bunch of annoying stock scams which aren't found by any of my sare lists, they keep on scoring low. So I decided to write a custom rule, which seem to work pretty well for my case: body __HILO_STOCKS1 /(High|Low|Curr[e3]nt|Cur(r|

NOTICE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available

SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 is released! This is a *prerelease* of SpamAssassin 3.2.0; not the full release. SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical and heuristic tests to identify spam (also known as unsolicited bulk email). Highlights of the release -

Annoying stocks scams

Hi List! I'm getting hit by a bunch of annoying stock scams which aren't found by any of my sare lists, they keep on scoring low. So I decided to write a custom rule, which seem to work pretty well for my case: body __HILO_STOCKS1 /(High|Low|Curr[e3]nt|Cur(r|\r.|r[e3]nt|\.)\ Price|Pr

Re: Russian and Chinese spam rulesets?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eray Aslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Some Russian and Chinese spam (especially Russian) is making its way to >our users inboxes. We do business with those 2 countries. >Consequently, lots of legitimate emails go back and forth so that I >cannot just bump up the sc