David B Funk wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Some of my incoming mesasges involve messages forwarded to my server via a rule
from accounts that some of my clients have on other ISPs mail servers. For such
incoming messages, I have been creating a temporary copy of the me
Actually I didn't defined that rule, it poped up, there was not any problem
days ago..I've looked up at /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf or
there is no .spamassassin/local_pref file also. Can't find
How can I find where it is...
thanks
Hasan Aydın ŞAŞMAZ
Genel Müdür Yardımcısı
BT
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> >
> > Some of my incoming mesasges involve messages forwarded to my server via a
> > rule from accounts that some of my clients have on other ISPs mail servers.
> > For such incoming messages, I have been creating a temporary copy of the
> > mess
My question... why **exactly** can't webmail line wrap messages? :)
Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) wrote:
1st question:
Some of my incoming mesasges involve messages forwarded to my server via a rule
from accounts that some of my clients have on other ISPs mail servers. For such
incoming m
Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> Personally, I didn't like the added delay for first-time mails,
which is
> why I chose to greylist only on blocklists, but for a minimal effort my
> spam was significantly reduced.
what are you using to greylist based on blocklists?
I use maRBL. The latest version l
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Andy Figueroa wrote:
Rich, if you can post the output as text files to a web site somewhere and
just send the link/url, that's the kindest way to to this. And then if I
knew what I was doing, I'd go look at them and analyze them for you.
Thought it won't be me, I'm sure so
Rich, if you can post the output as text files to a web site somewhere
and just send the link/url, that's the kindest way to to this. And then
if I knew what I was doing, I'd go look at them and analyze them for
you. Thought it won't be me, I'm sure someone will.
Andy Figueroa
Rich Shepard
Thanks, again, Matt. I need all the help I can get. I've only been
managing my own SpamAssassin installations (two mailservers) for about
four months and still have a lot to learn.
Andy
Matt Kettler wrote:
Andy Figueroa wrote:
You can capture the debug output by using:
spamassassin -D -t <
> Personally, I didn't like the added delay for first-time mails, which is
> why I chose to greylist only on blocklists, but for a minimal effort my
> spam was significantly reduced.
what are you using to greylist based on blocklists?
I use maRBL. The latest version lets me greylist (I use sqlg
On Friday 26 January 2007 03:21, uNiXpSyChO wrote:
> Chris Purves wrote:
> > Personally, I didn't like the added delay for first-time mails, which is
> > why I chose to greylist only on blocklists, but for a minimal effort my
> > spam was significantly reduced.
> >
> > Hope that helps.
>
> what are
Chris Purves wrote:
Matthew Bickerton wrote:
<...snip...>
Personally, I didn't like the added delay for first-time mails, which is
why I chose to greylist only on blocklists, but for a minimal effort my
spam was significantly reduced.
Hope that helps.
what are you using to greylist ba
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Matt Kettler wrote:
The proper command would be:
spamassassin -D bayes < message1 2> debug1.txt
OK. I have a spam message that made it to my inbox today. Empty body, the
spam base64 encoded. SA gave it a score of 0 this morning.
I've run it through the debug process
I'm trying to initialize a database for Bayes from perl (DIY).
Using Test::More as a start I tried:
can_ok('Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore', ('tie_db_readonly'));
my $to = 'tom';
my $spamtest = Mail::SpamAssassin->new( {username => $to, debug=>'all'} );
isa_ok($spamtest, 'Mail::SpamAssassin');
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> Debug results are available on:
> http://dev.blue-canoe.net/spam/spam01.txt
> http://dev.blue-canoe.net/spam/debug1.txt
>
> http://dev.blue-canoe.net/spam/spam02.txt
> http://dev.blue-canoe.net/spam/debug2.txt
>
> http://dev.blue-canoe.net/spam/spam03.txt
> http://dev.blue-
Andy Figueroa wrote:
> Thanks, Matt. That sounds like a good suggestion.
>
> Nigel, since you have the emails, if you could capture the debug
> output in a file and post like you did the messages, perhaps someone
> wise could evaluate what is going on.
>
> You can capture the debug output by using
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:56, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:50:13AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>
>>> I got this email from Rules_Du_Jour this morning, what is the fix?
>>>
>> Don't take this the wrong way, but did you read the erro
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 02:32:11AM +0200, Aydin SASMAZ wrote:
> adds a test score Fw_mail 100.00 but I got the email because my email
[...]
> What is the real cause of this and how prevent spamassassin adding this
> Fw_mail 100 score any forwarded email
"Fw_mail" is not a standard rule included wi
Hi all,
I'm new in the list and I have a problem with my Spamassassin so that I've
realized when I forward one of my email to my email address spamassassin
adds a test score Fw_mail 100.00 but I got the email because my email
address is in whitelist. If I forward non-spam email in my inbox t
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Jason Little wrote:
>
> I was wondering about the maturity of the botnet plugin and where I can get
> my hands on it again. I used an early version of it for a while but I
> removed it because we didn't really need it and now it seems I need it again
> with all the spammers f
Matthew Bickerton wrote:
I have been thinking about implementing Greylisting. However, I am worried
about blocking/long delays with e-mails from mail farms (gmail, yahoo etc.)
You could compromise by greylisting based on blocklists (such as
spamhaus, etc.). This would free up some resources
I am using postgrey which allows for whitelisting of address ranges,
specific IPs, etc. I implemented it on the Thanksgiving weekend so it
could build up it's triplet database before hitting the work week email
and I've not had a single person complain. On the flip side, I very
rarely see spam come
I was wondering about the maturity of the botnet plugin and where I can get
my hands on it again. I used an early version of it for a while but I
removed it because we didn't really need it and now it seems I need it again
with all the spammers finding a way to slip a 3.7 acore by spamassassin an
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Florent Gilain wrote:
hI,
> Hello all,
>
> When i run this :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin]# spamassassin --lint
> [21570] warn: config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
> MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART
> [21570] warn: config: warning: description exists for non-ex
BACKGROUND:
First, I do NOT use SA for IP or URI based lookups as I do those in my own
custom programmed spam filter.
But I do desire to use SA for such things as Razor, SARE rules, ImageInfo, etc.
Therefore, I have the following set up to prevent IP lookups:
skip_rbl_checks 1
And other items
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 21:29, Chris Purves wrote:
> I was wondering what is the best way to deal with spam that comes
> through on mailing lists? For mailing lists like spamassassin I
> whitelist all mail because I expect to see examples of spam, but for
> other lists, is it a good idea to r
Hi All,I am using spamd/spamc combination to scan incomming messages on my qmail/vpopmail system. My SpamAssassin Client version is 3.1.1My Platform is FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASEI recently made some changes to my configuration and am running spamc as user qscand and I'm sure I made some other changes thro
Hello Justin,
Thursday, January 25, 2007, 12:57:18 PM, you wrote:
> hi all --
> OK, if you're planning to send us mass-check logs for the 3.2.0 rescoring,
> now's the time!
OK, so we can start running the tests now? To ensure I am correct at
how to go about this, we just svn update the latest
"Steven W. Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm running sendmail and I want a good greylist that uses a mysql
database. There are all sorts of things out there but they're not
dbms based.
Relaydelay (http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/downloads.html)
is the only Sendmail greylister I kno
On Thursday 25 January 2007 12:33, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:20:09 -0500, Gene Heskett
>
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:56, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>>>On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:50:13AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
I got this email from Rules_Du_
hi all --
OK, if you're planning to send us mass-check logs for the 3.2.0 rescoring,
now's the time!
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreDetails has all the details.
Note that the deadline for result submission is Tuesday, Feb 6 as
described at http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Release3
On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:56, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:50:13AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I got this email from Rules_Du_Jour this morning, what is the fix?
>
>Don't take this the wrong way, but did you read the errors at all?
>
>> Lint output: [16404] warn: config
Hello all,
When i run this :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin]# spamassassin --lint
[21570] warn: config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART
[21570] warn: config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
BIZ_TLD
[21570] warn: lint: 2 issues detected, plea
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:56:47 -0500 (EST)
"Steven W. Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, Jan 25th 2007 at 12:49 -, quoth --[ UxBoD ]--:
>
> =>Check out http://policyd.sourceforge.net/ then as it allows you to
> =>specify Servers/IP that should not be greylisted. Works very well.
> =
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:20:09 -0500, Gene Heskett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:56, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>>On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:50:13AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> I got this email from Rules_Du_Jour this morning, what is the fix?
>>
>>Don't take this the wro
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:28:21 -0500, Andy Figueroa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks, Matt. That sounds like a good suggestion.
>
>Nigel, since you have the emails, if you could capture the debug output
>in a file and post like you did the messages, perhaps someone wise could
>evaluate what is
On Thursday, Jan 25th 2007 at 12:49 -, quoth --[ UxBoD ]--:
=>Check out http://policyd.sourceforge.net/ then as it allows you to
=>specify Servers/IP that should not be greylisted. Works very well.
=>
I know this is the wrong pleace to discuss this, but since I didn't start
it, I'm taking ad
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:50:13AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I got this email from Rules_Du_Jour this morning, what is the fix?
Don't take this the wrong way, but did you read the errors at all?
> Lint output: [16404] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: README:
> [16404] warn: config
/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/antidrug.cf.2;
mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/antidrug.cf.20070125-0559
/etc/mail/spamassassin/antidrug.cf;
Lint output: [16404] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: README:
[16404] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: WARNING: YOU HAVE
DOWNLOADED
Kim Christensen wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> I've recently started training our bayesian filter with spam/ham from my
> personal mailbox, to prepare for live usage on our customer accounts.
>
> % sa-learn --dump magic
> ...
> 0.000 0340 0 non-token data: nspam
> 0.000
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:28:21 -0500, Andy Figueroa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks, Matt. That sounds like a good suggestion.
>
>Nigel, since you have the emails, if you could capture the debug output
>in a file and post like you did the messages, perhaps someone wise could
>evaluate what is
>>> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/25/07 10:03AM >>>
Clay Davis wrote:
> Has anyone thrown this to the SA wolves... I mean group, to get their
> opnion? (get ready to duck!)
> Clay
Disclaimer: I'm just a community member, and really don't care about
Guinevere or GWAVA, nor do I know much abou
Clay Davis wrote:
> Has anyone thrown this to the SA wolves... I mean group, to get their
> opnion? (get ready to duck!)
> Clay
Disclaimer: I'm just a community member, and really don't care about
Guinevere or GWAVA, nor do I know much about either.
Their statements about accuracy make me laugh.
Has anyone thrown this to the SA wolves... I mean group, to get their
opnion? (get ready to duck!)
Clay
>>> On 1/25/2007 at 9:49 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Joe Zitnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Well, I'm going to bite my tongue on this until I hear something else.
Every time I've used
maillist wrote:
Kim Christensen wrote:
Hey list,
I've recently started training our bayesian filter with spam/ham from my
personal mailbox, to prepare for live usage on our customer accounts.
% sa-learn --dump magic
...
0.000 0340 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000
Kim Christensen wrote:
Hey list,
I've recently started training our bayesian filter with spam/ham from my
personal mailbox, to prepare for live usage on our customer accounts.
% sa-learn --dump magic
...
0.000 0340 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0475
ned the following plus a traceback that
> >> mentioned missing operators.
> >>
> >> **WARNING***: spamassassin --lint failed.
> >> Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssassin.
> >> Rollback command is: mv -f /etc/spamassassin/antidrug.cf
> >
Thanks, Matt. That sounds like a good suggestion.
Nigel, since you have the emails, if you could capture the debug output
in a file and post like you did the messages, perhaps someone wise could
evaluate what is going on.
You can capture the debug output by using:
spamassassin -D -t < messag
Andy Figueroa wrote:
> Matt (but not just to Matt), I don't understand your reply (though I
> am deeply in your dept for the work you do for this community). The
> sample emails that Nigel posted are identical in content, including
> obfuscation. I've noted the same situation. Yet, the scoring i
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 07:18:45PM +0530, Ramprasad wrote:
> How do I make it use files on /usr/share/spamassassin too
Why would you need that? If you have an update installed, that's the
directory you want to use.
> I just need a command line version to run lint
I'm not sure I understand you
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, pocopelli wrote:
hI,
> Hello everybody,
>
> we have an extern rootserver with our provider in Germany.
> MTA=Qmail
> Config Webinterface = PLESK 8.0
> We have a number of domains hosted on it with emailAccounts.
> The mails of the different domains are in subdirecties similar
*: spamassassin --lint failed.
>> Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssassin.
>> Rollback command is: mv -f /etc/spamassassin/antidrug.cf
>> /etc/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/antidrug.cf.2; mv -f
>> /etc/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/antidrug.cf.20070125-0029
Matt (but not just to Matt), I don't understand your reply (though I am
deeply in your dept for the work you do for this community). The sample
emails that Nigel posted are identical in content, including
obfuscation. I've noted the same situation. Yet, the scoring is really
different. On th
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Doc Schneider wrote:
I always run sa-update -D to see what is happening.
Thank you, Doc. Copying the script to /usr/local/bin/ also made a
difference.
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. |The Environmental Permitting
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 09:46 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 01:17:15PM +0530, Ramprasad wrote:
> > But If I have /var/lib/spamassassin with some files in it SA is
> > apparently ignoring /usr/share/spamassassin/*.cf
>
> Yes. That's how updates work.
>
How do I make it
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 05:20:27AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:01:58PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> >>Am I correct in understanding that I have to run sa-learn for every user
> >>who is going to have a bayes token store?
> >
> >If you are running
You have described why it wont work as good. Using your method the
headers become useless - bayes ill learn only the body/subject content.
You would need to tell bayes to ignore the headers.
With pop3 you only have the option you describe - this may still work ok?
Pete
Oenus Tech Services wro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Bickerton wrote:
> Thanks, but does this mean I have to keep/maintain a list of all the mail
> farms. Keeping this list up to date sounds horrid/impossible.
>
> Matthew
>
> -Original Message-
> From: --[ UxBoD ]-- [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
You can use wildcards :)
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:58:51 -
"Matthew Bickerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, but does this mean I have to keep/maintain a list of all the
> mail farms. Keeping this list up to date sounds horrid/impossible.
>
> Matthew
>
> -Original Message-
> F
starting SpamAssassin.
> Rollback command is: mv -f /etc/spamassassin/antidrug.cf
> /etc/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/antidrug.cf.2; mv -f
> /etc/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/antidrug.cf.20070125-0029
> /etc/spamassassin/antidrug.cf;
>
>
> I couldnt rollback because the file antidru
Thanks, but does this mean I have to keep/maintain a list of all the mail
farms. Keeping this list up to date sounds horrid/impossible.
Matthew
-Original Message-
From: --[ UxBoD ]-- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 January 2007 12:49
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sh
Hey list,
I've recently started training our bayesian filter with spam/ham from my
personal mailbox, to prepare for live usage on our customer accounts.
% sa-learn --dump magic
...
0.000 0340 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0475 0 non-token data
Check out http://policyd.sourceforge.net/ then as it allows you to
specify Servers/IP that should not be greylisted. Works very well.
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:33:19 -
"Matthew Bickerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am setting up a new server, so have a chance to make big changes to
Hi,
I am setting up a new server, so have a chance to make big changes to my
email server.
I have been thinking about implementing Greylisting. However, I am worried
about blocking/long delays with e-mails from mail farms (gmail, yahoo etc.)
I would very much appreciate other people's recommenda
/RulesDuJour/antidrug.cf.2; mv -f
/etc/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/antidrug.cf.20070125-0029
/etc/spamassassin/antidrug.cf;
I couldnt rollback because the file antidrug.cf.20070125-0029 did not
exist so I decided to run spamassassin --lint at the command line myself
expecting the same error but instead it
Hello everybody,
we have an extern rootserver with our provider in Germany.
MTA=Qmail
Config Webinterface = PLESK 8.0
We have a number of domains hosted on it with emailAccounts.
The mails of the different domains are in subdirecties similar to
/var/qmail/mailnames/clientdomain.de/mailuser
A
Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:01:58PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
Am I correct in understanding that I have to run sa-learn for every user
who is going to have a bayes token store?
If you are running per-user Bayes (nothing else makes much sense,
IMHO), yes, but only if they w
Thanks, Peter
Yes, but this would not work with our more than 1500 customers that have
only pop3 access and do not have access to any shared or private folder
in the servers. We needed to implement some way for these pop3-only
customers to report spam back to us, and for now we've only thought of
67 matches
Mail list logo
