On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:20:09 -0500, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:56, Theo Van Dinter wrote: >>On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:50:13AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: >>> I got this email from Rules_Du_Jour this morning, what is the fix? >> >>Don't take this the wrong way, but did you read the errors at all? >> >>> Lint output: [16404] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: >>> README: [16404] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: WARNING: >>> YOU HAVE DOWNLOADED THIS RULESET from COMCAST. I am TERMINATING THIS >>> ACCOUNT. [16404] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Someone >>> else will eventually have control of this webspace, possibly a >>> malicious spammer. [16404] warn: config: failed to parse line, >>> skipping: STOP using RDJ on this file *NOW* >>> [16404] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Also, make note >>> of the fact that this file is for users of SA 2.64 and below. >> >>It makes it pretty clear that you should stop using it and why. > >Yes I did read it, but I'm not sure what rule I should remove, or if I >should stop using rulesdujour. Has it fallen out of favor or was it too >good for somebody? > >FWIW, rulesdujour, if its complaining about a package, should not only say >its an out of date package, but should name it so that one can find and >remove it! This message didn't arrive until after this one this morning: > >Matt Kettler's AntiDrug has changed on coyote.coyote.den. >Version line: # rev 0.65 10/01/2006 - updated URL, etc > >So I assume that's the file being bitched about, so I've removed several >of them in the /etc/spamassassin/rulesdujour dir, and removed the >antidrug thing from /etc/rulesdujour/config. > >Damn I get enough of that, some of them claim I could get it up if I was >100 years old. But I'm diabetic & 72, so the chances are somewhere >between damned slim and none. What else is in your RDJ config? It might be worth taking a walk through the rules site and just checking what you've got and what, if any have been obfuscated. Kind regards Nigel
