On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> >
> > Some of my incoming mesasges involve messages forwarded to my server via a
> > rule from accounts that some of my clients have on other ISPs mail servers.
> > For such incoming messages, I have been creating a temporary copy of the
> > message where all headers that were ADDED by either the other ISP and/or my
> > server are removed so that the message is brought back to the state that it
> > was in when originally sent by the original sender (just prior to the ISP's
> > mail server received it). This way, SA can work with that the potential
> > spammer actually sent, without any received headers added.
> >
> > But is that really necessary? Or would I get the same results if, under my
> > configuration described above, I just left the extra added headers in there?
>
> To get the same functionality without stripping headers you'd have to
> add the forwarders' IPs to your trusted and internal networks config.
Pardon my confusion, but wouldn't it be sufficient to just add them to
the trusted networks list? (IE not adding them to internal too).
IIUR, internal networks are for clients that will source messages,
trusted is for MTAs that feed you. Am I missing something?
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
