On 10 Jan 2007 at 18:21, John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>
> > Hi, John: Looked at your stuff with interest, especially the
> > milter- regex.conf file.
> >
> > This line: header /Subject/i/[??
> > ...appears to be missing a delimiter on the end "/i" per
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> Hi, John: Looked at your stuff with interest, especially the
> milter- regex.conf file.
>
> This line: header /Subject/i /[??
> ...appears to be missing a delimiter on the end "/i" perhaps?
> ...or anything more should be there and what does it do?
Th
On 10 Jan 2007 at 9:35, John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, JohnKelly wrote:
>
> > When installing SpamAssassin, it gave the option to delete spam,
>
> Spamassassin marks, it does NOT dispose. There's some automatic
> infrastructure beyond spamassassin involved here. Can you give us so
Dave Williss wrote:
> I've setup SpamAssassin (latest stable version as of last week) and
> got it running via spamd and postfix is scanning the email using
> spamc. This all works well now.
>
> However, I can't get it to recognize settings in
> ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs.
>
> I found a hint here.
From: "D Ivago" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi all,
i''ve been using spamassassin for over a year now and I'm really happy
with
this solution.
At he moment my maximum SA score is 3.0 and this seems to stop 99% of spam
without marking wanted mail as spam.
Now I get like +200 mails in my spam folder
At 02:41 PM Wednesday, 1/10/2007, you wrote -=>
Hello!
I've a problem with specific stock offers. I tried to send sample to
the list, but it looks, that post was filtered out.
How to do it ?
IMHO, the best way is to post them on a web page if available to you
and send us the url...
Jarek wrote:
Hello!
I've a problem with specific stock offers. I tried to send sample to
the list, but it looks, that post was filtered out.
How to do it ?
Use pastebin ?
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
http://www.blacknight.ie/
http://b
Hello!
I've a problem with specific stock offers. I tried to send sample to
the list, but it looks, that post was filtered out.
How to do it ?
--
Jarek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
René Berber wrote:
> Look for Log::Agent in the (required) Perl modules section.
I made sure that Log::Agent V0.307, reported as being up-to-date, was
installed before asking. However, a mail from Christian made me look at
my /etc/mail/spamassassin directory again, and I suddenly realized that
a
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 04:19:00PM -0600, Dave Williss wrote:
> I've setup SpamAssassin (latest stable version as of last week) and got
> it running via spamd and postfix is scanning the email using spamc.
> This all works well now.
Ok, so you're running it from the MTA, also known as site-wide
I've setup SpamAssassin (latest stable version as of last week) and got
it running via spamd and postfix is scanning the email using spamc.
This all works well now.
However, I can't get it to recognize settings in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs.
I found a hint here
http://wiki.apache.org/s
I'm using amavisd with SA. There is a directive there called
"sa_mail_body_size_limit = undef; # don't waste time on SA if mail is
larger". This was set to 1024*200 which would be 204800k. I've
actually just now set it to undef. Hopefully this is what you meant? I
don't have high hopes. But, we'l
Elizabeth Schwartz wrote:
>
> On the social side, the other reason to think twice about doing this is
> that
> false positives happen. If you intercept all tagged mail, your users won't
> get the chance to review their spam, and conversely you might find
> yourself
> with private email (someone
I've sent requested info via "reply to author" link, thanks!
John D. Hardin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, JohnKelly wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure about the MTA... running sendmail on a FreeBSD
>> server.
>
> ...and discussing procmail implies procmail is your delivery agent.
> Okay.
>
>> Act
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, JohnKelly wrote:
> I'm not sure about the MTA... running sendmail on a FreeBSD
> server.
...and discussing procmail implies procmail is your delivery agent.
Okay.
> Actually I was planning on forwarding to a pseudo-user, by setting
> up a POP account for [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
On the social side, the other reason to think twice about doing this is that
false positives happen. If you intercept all tagged mail, your users won't
get the chance to review their spam, and conversely you might find yourself
with private email (someone's x-rated note, perhaps, or mortgage info?
Ralph Seichter wrote:
> I'm having trouble with FuzzyOcr 3.5.1, as you can see in the attached
> "spamassassin --lint" report. Have I made a mistake in the config file
> or is my Perl installation incomplete? I have not yet found any helpful
> information on the Net, but if there is anything I mis
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 2:14 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Q: **other** good "general" Spam/Mail Admin Lists?
>
>
> RE: Questiona bout **other** good "general" Spam/Mail
Hey all,
I have a mail server set up using spamassassin for a company which has
several mail forms. When spam started getting sent through the forms, and
several form emails were (correctly) marked spam, those receiving the form
mails were suddenly concerned that they might eventually lose a good
RE: Questiona bout **other** good "general" Spam/Mail Admin Lists?
About a month or two ago, I recall someone posting advice to another SA list
member about *other* lists which would be good lists to post general spam
and/or e-mail server administration questions to whenever the topic or questio
John D. Hardin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, JohnKelly wrote:
>
>> When installing SpamAssassin, it gave the option to delete spam,
>
> Spamassassin marks, it does NOT dispose. There's some automatic
> infrastructure beyond spamassassin involved here. Can you give us some
> more details abou
If you're seeing ALL_TRUSTED in all of your email headers, that has
nothing to do with Bayes. It's a different setting in
spam.assassin.prefs.conf. When it doesn't know which IP(s) to count as
"trusted", all are trusted. Add in a line or two in the form of:
trusted_networks 127.0.0.1 #trust ev
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 03:26:59PM +, Robert Brooks wrote:
> incidentally, I see no hits for RCVD_IN_SBL, could it be that
[... the rule ...]
> is missing the host to query?
> looks like it should be the 2nd argument to check_rbl
No, it's a rbl sub test, based off of:
header __RCVD_IN_ZEN
Hi,
I have followed the discussion about -notfirsthop vs -lastexternal.
It is generally agreed that mail originating right from a mail server is
considered good,
and that mail sent from any ip via a mail server is considered good as well, if
the path to the
mail server was authenticated.
It is
Mark Martinec wrote the following on 10/01/2007 16:45:
The Plugin/DKIM.pm is all there is to it. No other files
in SA plugins directory is associated with DKIM.
There is however a Mail/DKIM.pm and Mail/DKIM/* perl module
in the usual modules places that you may be looking for.
Mark
Thanks M
Hi list,
I'm having trouble with FuzzyOcr 3.5.1, as you can see in the attached
"spamassassin --lint" report. Have I made a mistake in the config file
or is my Perl installation incomplete? I have not yet found any helpful
information on the Net, but if there is anything I missed, I'd be glad
for
On 1/10/07, D Ivago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:0:
* ^Subject:.*\<[SPAM]\>
/dev/null
Square brackets have special meaning: [SPAM] is a character class
matching one of any of the characters S, P, A, or M. What you need
is:
:0
* ^Subject:.*\<\[SPAM\]
/dev/null
However, I'd not recommend that.
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
>
> squintr wrote:
>> I'm seeing this in every message that goes through SpamAssassin:
>>
>> Score Matching Rule Description
>> cached not
>> score=1.451
>> 2 required
>> -1.80 ALL_TRUSTED
>> -2.60 BAYES_00
>>
>> This is often causing spam that should have a
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, JohnKelly wrote:
> When installing SpamAssassin, it gave the option to delete spam,
Spamassassin marks, it does NOT dispose. There's some automatic
infrastructure beyond spamassassin involved here. Can you give us some
more details about your MTA and how it delivers messages
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, D Ivago wrote:
> I just added the 3 last lines as seen on a webpage but it doesn't
> work, any suggestions what I exactely need to put in there?
Take a look at the spamassassin procmail file in
http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/antispam/
Note that you *do* have to edit it to f
Using SpamAssassin v3.15, would like to have any message tagged as spam to be
re-routed to a single email account on the server instead of the individual
user's email account. 50+ users and constantly changing, so would like this
to be a global setting if possible.
When installing SpamAssassin, i
Alan,
> The DKIM plugin files have all but disappeared on one of my mx's..I'm
> left with
>
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/DKIM.pm
> /usr/share/man/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM.3pm.gz
The Plugin/DKIM.pm is all there is to it. No other files
in SA plugins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Len Conrad wrote:
> With the severe obfuscation of spam images with:
>
> 1) low-contrast between f/g and b/g and
>
> 2) random images/edges in the b/g,
>
> ... how effective is FuzzyOCR in OCR accuracy?
With these two factors, FuzzyOcr has not much pr
Hi all,
i''ve been using spamassassin for over a year now and I'm really happy with
this solution.
At he moment my maximum SA score is 3.0 and this seems to stop 99% of spam
without marking wanted mail as spam.
Now I get like +200 mails in my spam folder marked as [SPAM] but would like
to delet
With the severe obfuscation of spam images with:
1) low-contrast between f/g and b/g and
2) random images/edges in the b/g,
... how effective is FuzzyOCR in OCR accuracy?
Len
The DKIM plugin files have all but disappeared on one of my mx's..I'm left
with
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/DKIM.pm
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM.3pm.gz
I've tried re-installing/upgrading from the rpm (spamassassin-3.1.7-1.fc5) but
this
>
> Thanks, did it.
> Seems that the args in the scansets would also need be changed. ??
>
Looking at the patch, and at my current files vs. distro files, the args
in the scansets stayed the same. Only differences are replacing
pamthreshold with pamditherbw.
Example from the patch file:
sca
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 23:39, Dan Horne wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: decoder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 9:17 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject: FuzzyOcr 3.5.1 released
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAG
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Proulx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 12:22 PM
>
> Will Nordmeyer wrote:
> > Does anyone have any suggestions on how to incorporate spamassassin
> > into the included majordomo 1.94.x system? Idiots spam "majordomo
> > owner
39 matches
Mail list logo
