Elizabeth Schwartz wrote:
>
> On the social side, the other reason to think twice about doing this is
> that
> false positives happen. If you intercept all tagged mail, your users won't
> get the chance to review their spam, and conversely you might find
> yourself
> with private email (someone's x-rated note, perhaps, or mortgage info?)
>
> Just something to think about.
>
> (in the last few months, I've had both my own and my boss's travel
> confirmation emails get false positive tags. Just sayin'.)
>
>
I understand, but thanks for mentioning it. It's just that some of the spam
messages are so, well, disgusting, that some of our more sensitive staff
don't even wish to receive them at all. So we decided to dump all spam into
a central garbage can so to speak.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re-route-spam-for-all-users-to-a-single-mailbox--tf2953672.html#a8266624
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
