Hi,

I have followed the discussion about -notfirsthop vs -lastexternal.
It is generally agreed that mail originating right from a mail server is 
considered good,
and that mail sent from any ip via a mail server is considered good as well, if 
the path to the
mail server was authenticated.
It is also generally agreed that mail not matching this criteria (sent straight 
from a client
machine, or relayed through a server that does not auth) is considered 
suspicious (and
earns some points in SA)
Now, in real life, there are probably many office-type systems where mail 
originates from a private
ip, goes to a local mail server without authentication (after all, it is their 
localnet), then their
local server sends - via an auth'd path - to a regular mailserver.
So I would suggest that a first hop from a private ip should be ignored when 
classifying relays.
Likewise, a first auth'd hop from a public ip, then travelling through private 
ip space, finally
to smarthost, looks like a valid roaming user sending through the company 
facilities.
On the other side, if mail is received from a public ip without auth, and then 
travels through
private ip space, one would assume that the first station probably is an open 
relay

Wolfgang Hamann

Reply via email to