Benny Pedersen wrote:
>i do that i extract there entrys from sql in to local_sql.cf so
>spamassassin see it
>
>horrelble interface :(
with amavid-debugsa i can see that sa is loading sql.cf
--
best regrads
boka
Hi,
My servers are suddenly facing a deluge of university spams. All that
"get gen uine de grees from pr estigious univers ities" type
These mails have no urls or email addresses, just some phone numbers to
call back. And the spammers are using some virgin routes , so they dont
hit the RCVD_IN
Fidel Leon wrote:
> The question is: the qmail-scanner config tool relies *exclusively* on GTUBE
> to check for a spam-nasty.eml with the GTUBE signature in it. SA 3.0.6
> recognizes the mail as spam, but 3.1.2 simply gives 0.0 score for the mail..
>
> I have checked what the configuration script d
UUism Networks (www.uuism.net) is NOT related to the UUNet network
(www.UU.net)
I think that the forged-HELO is just another SA rule, not part of the SPF
module.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Sietse van Zanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 08:25 AM
To: Jim Herma
On Thursday June 22 2006 01:25, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Sonntag, 18. Juni 2006 01:37 Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > So my DSN had to contain "dbname=" and "host=", separated via
> > semicolon.
>
> Nobody of the devs got anything to say on that? I'm not sure if I did
> everything correct (at least
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Alan Premselaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip...
> And the first thing in the Ham was about adding their
address to your
> contacts to make sure you get their email. If they were so
worried, they
> would write better marketing emails.
>
> --
On Sonntag, 18. Juni 2006 01:37 Michael Monnerie wrote:
> So my DSN had to contain "dbname=" and "host=", separated via
> semicolon.
Nobody of the devs got anything to say on that? I'm not sure if I did
everything correct (at least it works now), at least the documentation
is not correct/mislead
- Original Message -
From: "Dirk Bonengel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi list,
just as the subject says: I added some stuff to
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/iXhash and
- made it clear (I hope) what it actually does
- added installation instructions
- added a version that runs under Sp
To recompile and reconfigure the server i get a error:
# ./imsimta cnbuild
Unknown group identifier ims-ms-daemon d found on channel
ims-ms
Unknown group identifier destinationspamfilteroptin s found on channel
ims-ms
Unknown group identifier spam
I added all of my domains into the local domain map.
Hopefully seeing all of the tags and attempting to run them back through my
spamassassin will show the problem
Thanks for the advice
Steven Lamb
-Original Message-
From: Mark Martinec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 23:00 +0200, Chr. v. Stuckrad wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
>
> > - added a version that runs under SpamAssassin 3.0.x
>
> Thanks a lot! After shortening some of the descriptions
> (my --lint complains because of more than 50 chars)
> it already caught
I need to integrate Spamassassin with Iplanet Messgin Server 5.2, I read
this link
http://docs.sun.com/source/817-6266/anti-spam.html#wp56718
But I don't have the library
spamfilter_library=/opt/SUNWmsgsr/lib/libspamass.so
to configure option.dat file
Where I get this library?
Also
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
> - added a version that runs under SpamAssassin 3.0.x
Thanks a lot! After shortening some of the descriptions
(my --lint complains because of more than 50 chars)
it already caught some spams this evening!
My users will like that :-) Stucki (postmaster
After reading the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf (spamassassin 3.1.3-1 on
Debian) I was unclear about trusted vs internal networks. After
reviewing previous emails on this list, here's what I think it is:
trusted_networks for hosts I trust to put good info in the Received
headers.
internal_networks for
Hi list,
just as the subject says: I added some stuff to
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/iXhash and
- made it clear (I hope) what it actually does
- added installation instructions
- added a version that runs under SpamAssassin 3.0.x
Dirk
My Spamassassin is no longer checking RBL lists for each incoming message,
and I've no idea why.
I installed Spamassassin on a new Centos server in February. The server runs
Exim and I manage it mostly through DirectAdmin (the install was using a
script that comes with DirectAdmin), I have a mode
Wolfgang,
I guess you already use spamassassin (why else post to this particular
list?). Make sure you use a recent release (3.1.3 is current) and the
rules from rulesemporium.com.
But apart from that I'd need more info
Hope this helps!
Servus
Dirk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi all,
> with amavid debug-sa i can see that sql.cf is loaded.
>
> i have added smth. like this to database:
>
> INSERT INTO userpref (username,preference,value) VALUES
> ('$GLOBAL','whitelist_from','[EMAIL PROTECTED]');
this is sa not amavisd
i do that i extract there entrys from sql in to local_sql.c
> Using SQL from SA is mainly useful for Bayes and AWL,
> but not for per-user settings and per-user w/b listing, as SA when called by
> amavisd always sees the same
> user: vscan
hope this will change so sql in sa can be used pr recipient more effitive, as i
understand its not currently
posibl
Try with this options in your spamassassin
config file
lock_method flock
bayes_auto_expire 1
bayes_learn_to_journal 1
Then your lock method are changed to
mutex semaphores and no more lock files are generated. This options causes
a good performance change on my server.
Hernán Pablo Giménez
Gci
This occurs from time to time so bayes databases cannot be opened.
Is there an option to remove any locks on startup or after idle period?
On 6/21/06, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ditto... having the same problem.
Here are the headers from one.. it got only a 2.0!
Is there somethign I can do to just block any inline images?
C{UT}
Received: from ntmail2.shscares.org (10.193.16.28 [10.193.16.28]) by
ntmail1.shscares.org with SMT
Steven,
> spam_scan: DSPAM not available, skipping it
That's fine, you have SA. Few people use DSPAM with amavisd-new.
> I have been having a problem with my amavis-new spamassassin install. I
> have had a user who complains of spam getting through despite the fact that
> I am using dns black li
I suppose I did. I used the files posed in the Wiki.
Dirk Bonengel wrote:
Nice to hear! But: Don't blame me if you get a FP due to iXhash.
Did you set up all three lists, btw? (i.e. manitu.net,
login-solutions.de and login-solutions.ag ??)
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, jdow wrote:
A one time one hour delay for a given source is no big deal.
That's a value judgement. Not universally true for everyone.
Probably true for lots of people, in which case ideas on how
to minimize the negatives of greylisting will be worthless.
For others, elim
Title: RE: HUMOR: Gap needs to fire Marketing people.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Premselaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 10:53 PM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: SaTalk (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: HUMOR: Gap needs to fire Marketing people.
>
>
> -BEGI
I have been having a problem with my amavis-new spamassassin install. I have
had a user who complains of spam getting through despite the fact that I am
using dns black lists and rule modifications to try and keep up with things.
The most annoying part that I find is that the messages that get thro
Isn't that because of the forged helo?
[28763] dbg: eval: forged-HELO: from= helo=baby by=uuserver.net
My sendmail would drop this mail even before it reaches spamassassin.
Also, I find it a little ironic, that the hostmaster of the once notorious
UUnet network, spammers safe haven in the early
I talked to the programmers for Mail::SPF:Query and they say this must be a
problem with Spamassassin.
Is anyone else seeing incorrect SPF_SOFTMAIL false positives?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 12:55 AM
T
John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Matt Hampton wrote:
>
>> I am adding the AS Number and CIDR by a milter. I want to track
>> which AS Numbers are producing the most spam.
> How does Bayes help you do that? You need something to pull the AS
> number out of messages that are marked as
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 11:55:44AM +0200, Leander Koornneef wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I also ran into this recently. The following fixed it:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# aptitude install db4.2-util
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# db4.2_upgrade /path/to/bayes_db
>
> Or something along those lines
> You
Hi,
I think I also ran into this recently. The following fixed it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# aptitude install db4.2-util
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# db4.2_upgrade /path/to/bayes_db
Or something along those lines
You should probably make a backup of the bayes db before you blindly
copy/paste these comma
Have you checked the directory for correct permissions? And there is a database
there?
Also the configuration option for bayes has been changed. Where it used to take
a path, it now takes a filename.
eg. used to be bayes_path /dir/bayes/ (would create db in that dir) and now is
bayes_path /dir
The mail server with debian woody has been upgraded to sarge.
Everything seemed to work as it should but after checking a bit deeper I
found that the following error:
Cannot open bayes databases /home/spamd/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie
failed:
The spamassassin version is 3.0.3-2 the previus ver
Nice to hear! But: Don't blame me if you get a FP due to iXhash.
Did you set up all three lists, btw? (i.e. manitu.net,
login-solutions.de and login-solutions.ag ??)
Dirk
Marc Perkel schrieb:
So far so good. This is as you say very accurate. I increased the
score to 4.5. No FPs so far. In fac
So far so good. This is as you say very accurate. I increased the score
to 4.5. No FPs so far. In fact it's catching spam that would have
slipped through. For what it's worth this should definitely be part of
the default package rather than a third party plugin.
Dirk Bonengel wrote:
Hi all,
just a few explanations to the iXhash stuff:
First of all, sorry there were no installation instructions - I'll
work on that (Marc already added a few lines - thanks)
What the plugin does is the following:
- It works solely on the body of an email.
- Given a few
On 21.06.2006 03:22 CE(S)T, jdow wrote:
> SARE and SpamAssassin
> plus the BLs have not let a ONE of either of those through yet this
> year.
Can you please explain me, what exact rules you added from SARE? I
cannot find anything usable there.
--
Yves Goergen "LonelyPixel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ht
38 matches
Mail list logo
