Re: Bayes advanced questions

Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 23:41 Matt Kettler wrote: > >> Particularly on servers with a site-wide DB used against broadly >> diverse spread of mail, increasing the token limit will improve >> accuracy. >> >> However, this comes at the expense of increased storage needs

Re: Bayes advanced questions

On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 23:41 Matt Kettler wrote: > Particularly on servers with a site-wide DB used against broadly > diverse spread of mail, increasing the token limit will improve > accuracy. > > However, this comes at the expense of increased storage needs and > slower performance. (In partic

Re: Name based RBL scoring

The closest is RHSBL, as these are hostname based, not IP based. But these look up the full hostname, not just the domain name. You could handle this on your back-end with wildcards... Looks like the RHSBL rules included in SA looks up the domain the From: email address in the envelope using

Re: ALL_TRUSTED causing false negatives?

Thursday 11 May 2006 00:19, Philip Mak wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:45:38PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > Philip Mak wrote: > > > SpamAssassin version 3.0.3 > > > running on Perl version 5.8.4 > > > > Upgrade to 3.1.1 if possible. > > When I type "apt-get install spamassassin", it says th

Re: ALL_TRUSTED causing false negatives?

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:47:40PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > Philip Mak wrote: > > Why does ALL_TRUSTED have a score of -3.3? Doesn't this mean that any > > spammer who connects directly to my mail server has a good chance of > > getting past SpamAssassin? > > That should not happen on a proper

Re: Name based RBL scoring

Sam Hayes Merritt, III wrote: > > I've searched and cannot find so I'm hoping someone can help. > > We have a RBL we host that contains the domain names of dynamic hosts, > spammers and other we do not want to receive email from. > > Currently in sendmail we use the revised dnsbl.m4 from Derek B

Name based RBL scoring

I've searched and cannot find so I'm hoping someone can help. We have a RBL we host that contains the domain names of dynamic hosts, spammers and other we do not want to receive email from. Currently in sendmail we use the revised dnsbl.m4 from Derek Balling (http://www.megacity.org/software

Re[2]: OT: anyone know how to do server-side MS-Exchange filters?

> When you create filters in outlook connected to exchange you can > chose if the filter is server or client side. A server-side user-level rule does not successfully meet the requirement of centrally managed filtering, because users can still delete or disable such rules. That's

Re: OT: anyone know how to do server-side MS-Exchange filters?

> Has anyone done this, and if so, what sort of tools allow it? What you want is called in Exchange a "store-wide sink," and there's plenty of info from MS on how to create one. If you want a quick petty-cash expense instead, go to ivasoft.biz and get their SpamMover (don't freak out about the

Re: Bayes advanced questions

Michael Monnerie wrote: > Dear SA users, I've had an offlist comparison of bayes DBs, and we found > some interesting differences. We're trying to find out why bayes on > server #1 makes better scores.: > > Server #1 local.cf (SA 3.1.1): > Server #1 bayes dump: > 0.000 0 93053

Bayes advanced questions

Dear SA users, I've had an offlist comparison of bayes DBs, and we found some interesting differences. We're trying to find out why bayes on server #1 makes better scores.: Server #1 local.cf (SA 3.1.1): bayes_expiry_max_db_size200 bayes_auto_expire 0 bayes_file

RE: Latest sa-stats from last week

jdow wrote: > From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > jdow wrote: > > > > > > Importune on them to feed you as large a collection of ham and > > > spam as they can, once. Then turn on autolearn, cross your > > > fingers, and put on your flack jacket. > > > > What flack jacket? I have Bayes

Re: OT: anyone know how to do server-side MS-Exchange filters?

When you create filters in outlook connected to exchange you can chose if the filter is server or client side. disclaimer - I don't know what versions of outlook or exchange are required to make it work. at my previous job where we had exchange I had outlook 2000 and I don't know what version

Re: Latest sa-stats from last week

From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jdow wrote: From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Michael Monnerie wrote: > > On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 16:18 Bowie Bailey wrote: > > > I've got per-user Bayes and most of my users > > > don't bother to train it. > > > > Another reason for site-wid

Re: Big Idiot Needs Instructions

From: "Chris Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hola, I have spent two days trying to figure out how to get the following to work. I have set up Spamassassin and ClamAV, I am running sendmail on the Solaris 10 platform. I would like to be able to scan for all spam and virus (in, out and relayed emai

Re: ALL_TRUSTED causing false negatives?

From: "Philip Mak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I've been getting a lot of spam lately ever since I moved my mail server to a new system. Here's one of the false negatives that slipped through, for example: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_B

Re: ALL_TRUSTED causing false negatives?

Philip Mak wrote: > I've been getting a lot of spam lately ever since I moved my mail > server to a new system. Here's one of the false negatives that slipped > through, for example: > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, > > NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD

Re: ALL_TRUSTED causing false negatives?

Wednesday 10 May 2006 22:35 skrev Philip Mak: > I've been getting a lot of spam lately ever since I moved my mail > server to a new system. Here's one of the false negatives that slipped > through, for example: > [...] > Why does ALL_TRUSTED have a score of -3.3? Doesn't this mean that any > spamme

RE: ALL_TRUSTED causing false negatives?

Philip Mak wrote: > I've been getting a lot of spam lately ever since I moved my mail > server to a new system. Here's one of the false negatives that slipped > through, for example: > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, > NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_BY_IP,YOUR_I

Re: Latest sa-stats from last week

Bowie Bailey wrote: Michael Monnerie wrote: On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 17:27 Bowie Bailey wrote: So you are saying that I should not feed Bayes with the unsolicited marketing garbage that I get because it looks like something that could have been requested?

ALL_TRUSTED causing false negatives?

I've been getting a lot of spam lately ever since I moved my mail server to a new system. Here's one of the false negatives that slipped through, for example: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_BY_IP,YOUR_INCOME autolearn=ham

RE: Latest sa-stats from last week

Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 17:27 Bowie Bailey wrote: > > So you are saying that I should not feed Bayes with the unsolicited > > marketing garbage that I get because it looks like something that > > could have been requested? > > If it's a newsletter from a seemingly legit

Re: OT: anyone know how to do server-side MS-Exchange filters?

John D. Hardin wrote: On Thu, 11 May 2006, Jason Haar wrote: Has anyone done this, and if so, what sort of tools allow it? A Linux mail relay in front of the Exchange server. :) That wouldn't allow messages to be put in a subfolder instead of inbox, just to do the h

Re: Latest sa-stats from last week

On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 17:27 Bowie Bailey wrote: > So you are saying that I should not feed Bayes with the unsolicited > marketing garbage that I get because it looks like something that > could have been requested? If it's a newsletter from a seemingly legit company I don't feed it to bayes.

Re: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

The message you sent directly to me hit the following: * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level * above 50% * [cf:

Re: The New SpamAssassin sa-update

David Baron wrote: > 1. Depends on some PERL packages: libarchive-tar-perl, libio-zlib-perl. > Debian > packages did not enforce this dependency. I installed them manually. > > 2. Fails after several time outs with: > http: request failed: 500 read timeout: 500 read timeout > error: no mirror da

Re: {SPAM}{!} Re: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

Bazooka Joe wrote: > the spam > and no I haven't done any bayes training. and dns is working. Are you running with SpamAssassin's built-in support for RBLs and URIBLs? That message text got *TORN UP* by the URIBLs on my system: X-EVI-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=15.259, r

Re: OT: anyone know how to do server-side MS-Exchange filters?

On Thu, 11 May 2006, Jason Haar wrote: > Has anyone done this, and if so, what sort of tools allow it? A Linux mail relay in front of the Exchange server. :) -- John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECT

The New SpamAssassin sa-update

1. Depends on some PERL packages: libarchive-tar-perl, libio-zlib-perl. Debian packages did not enforce this dependency. I installed them manually. 2. Fails after several time outs with: http: request failed: 500 read timeout: 500 read timeout error: no mirror data available for channel updates.s

Re: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

the spamHi RobarIt is sad but it is true that the large groups of women are unhappy withthe size of there BF is thing. Don't be that guy,www.missusoandforever.org/ab1/ . and station, designed been grabbed theorized to artistThank youi run rulesTRUSTED_RULESETS="SARE_STOCKS TRIPWIRE SARE_EVILNUMBERS

OT: anyone know how to do server-side MS-Exchange filters?

We currently have to rely on users to create "Rules Wizard" settings under Outlook to filter off their Spam (via "X-Spam-Status:" headers). What would be better is if Exchange could do like procmail/maildrop and allow the SysAdmin to create the rule on the server - so it hits everyone. It should

Re: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

Bazooka Joe wrote: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_60 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on agwebinc.com I have required of 3

Re: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

Bazooka Joe wrote: > > *X-Spam-Status:* No, score=1.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_60 autolearn=ham > version=3.0.4 > *X-Spam-Level:* * > *X-Spam-Checker-Version:* SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on > agwebinc.com As far as the autolearner is concerned, the score of that me

Re: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_60 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on agwebinc.com I have required of 3 which you can see and i have the milter rejecting email w/ score more than 7On 5/10/06, Matt Kettl

RE: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

Bazooka Joe wrote: > more and more i am seeing spam marked as autolearn=ham This means that the spam is being given a very low score from SA. The score used here does not include the Bayes scoring, but if you learn very many like this, then the effectiveness of your Bayes database will drop. > I

Re: spam getting autolearn=ham problem

Bazooka Joe wrote: > more and more i am seeing spam marked as autolearn=ham > > I was wondering the best way to correct this? Depends.. Really you first need to figure out why it this happened before you take any action at all. Can you post a X-Spam-Status header for one of the messages? Have

Problem with spamassassin skipping messages and sa-learn coredumps on sync

Greetings all, I am having a problem where spamassassin is not running on all my messages and a bunch of spam is slipping into my inbox as a result. I would say this has been going on for about a month, but it took me a few weeks to notice the lack of spamassassin headers in the skipped mail.

RE: seeing a lot of these?

Ken A wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > Ken A wrote: > > > EMPTY_MESSAGE 1.50, MISSING_HEADERS 0.19, MISSING_SUBJECT 1.34, > > > MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER 0.00, MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID 0.93, NO_REAL_NAME > > > 0.55, TO_CC_NONE 0.13, UNCLOSED_BRACKET 2.48 > > > > > > ? > > > We are seeing many, many hundreds

spam getting autolearn=ham problem

more and more i am seeing spam marked as autolearn=hamI was wondering the best way to correct this? I was going to delete the bayes and whitelist files and start over but I thought I would see what you do when this happens. my setupusing fc4sendmailspamass-milter - one bayes file for all users on s

Re: seeing a lot of these?

Bowie Bailey wrote: Ken A wrote: EMPTY_MESSAGE 1.50, MISSING_HEADERS 0.19, MISSING_SUBJECT 1.34, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER 0.00, MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID 0.93, NO_REAL_NAME 0.55, TO_CC_NONE 0.13, UNCLOSED_BRACKET 2.48 ? We are seeing many, many hundreds of these very small messages, with NO Subject: or

RE: seeing a lot of these?

Ken A wrote: > EMPTY_MESSAGE 1.50, MISSING_HEADERS 0.19, MISSING_SUBJECT 1.34, > MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER 0.00, MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID 0.93, NO_REAL_NAME 0.55, > TO_CC_NONE 0.13, UNCLOSED_BRACKET 2.48 > > ? > We are seeing many, many hundreds of these very small messages, with > NO Subject: or To: headers

seeing a lot of these?

EMPTY_MESSAGE 1.50, MISSING_HEADERS 0.19, MISSING_SUBJECT 1.34, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER 0.00, MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID 0.93, NO_REAL_NAME 0.55, TO_CC_NONE 0.13, UNCLOSED_BRACKET 2.48 ? We are seeing many, many hundreds of these very small messages, with NO Subject: or To: headers and NO Message Body

RE: Big Idiot Needs Instructions

Chris Edwards wrote: > > /usr/local/bin/spamd -d -u nobody > > I get these errors... > > [24001] warn: unix dgram connect: Socket operation on non-socket at > /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/Mail/SpamAssassin/Logger/Syslog.pm line 79 > [24001] error: no connection to syslog available at > /usr/perl5/

RE: Big Idiot Needs Instructions

Thanks for all the quick replies! I was able to get both the mileters up and running. Now I have one new question... When I run spamd... /usr/local/bin/spamd -d -u nobody I get these errors... [24001] warn: unix dgram connect: Socket operation on non-socket at /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/Mail

RE: Bayes not working

Steven Stern wrote: > Everything's tweaked to use "root" as the user. ... you've got to ask yourself a question: Do I feel lucky? -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer

Re: Bayes not working

Steven Stern wrote: >> > Everything's tweaked to use "root" as the user. We do sitewide > processing since this sits on an MX server. > Do you use spamd? If so, it WILL NOT use root as the user. Ever. Period.

Re: Bayes not working

Michael Monnerie wrote: On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 16:01 Steven Stern wrote: I imported a corpus of about 2 messages total and it wasn't working. I blew it all away and started from scratch thinking that was the problem. For now, local.cf has a minimum of 100 messages of each type. The cu

RE: Big Idiot Needs Instructions

Mike Jackson wrote: >> I have set up Spamassassin and ClamAV, I am running >> sendmail on the Solaris 10 platform. I would like to be able to >> scan for all spam and virus (in, out and relayed email). > > Both SA and ClamAV can run from milters - ClamAV comes with its own, > but you'd have to Go

Re: Big Idiot Needs Instructions

I have spent two days trying to figure out how to get the following to work. I have set up Spamassassin and ClamAV, I am running sendmail on the Solaris 10 platform. I would like to be able to scan for all spam and virus (in, out and relayed email). Can someone please point me in the right dire

Big Idiot Needs Instructions

Hola, I have spent two days trying to figure out how to get the following to work. I have set up Spamassassin and ClamAV, I am running sendmail on the Solaris 10 platform. I would like to be able to scan for all spam and virus (in, out and relayed email). Can someone please point me in the rig

RE: Upgrade issues

Jason Staudenmayer wrote: > > I upgrade from 2.63 to 3.1 a few weeks ago and it's running fine but I > can seem to figure out how to get something working again. > I did RTFM but I'm still at a loss, I'm looking to get my header > reports back in. below is what I have in my local.cf > > # This is

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK|On a side note, to anyone watching this seemingly incredible long discusion about one FP: |This is typically what URIBL member do. We take every FP and delist request seriously. We do deep research on |each one. Much deeper then anything you have seen here in

Upgrade issues

Hi all, I upgrade from 2.63 to 3.1 a few weeks ago and it's running fine but I can seem to figure out how to get something working again. I did RTFM but I'm still at a loss, I'm looking to get my header reports back in. below is what I have in my local.cf # This is the right place to customize yo

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK On a side note, to anyone watching this seemingly incredible long discusion about one FP: This is typically what URIBL member do. We take every FP and delist request seriously. We do deep research on each one. Much deeper then anything you have see

RE: Strange Bayes results

Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 17:08 Bowie Bailey wrote: > > Yes, this user is set with all the default options for Bayes > > learning and a spam threshold of 5.0. The entire Bayes database > > was created via autolearn for this user. > > Is that possible at all? I though tha

Re: limit child process

Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > > spamd -m > > and what would be an ideal number to set it ? > > I came in this morning , got a bunch of those swap message , and my VM is at > 86% right now As Chris S already said, there's no hard-fast rule here. However, here's a rule of thumb to start with: 1

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

jdow wrote: > From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Let's look at their IPs they are hosting their domain from: >> $ host uhmcargo*MUNGED*.com > > Fascinating - even the whois registration seems to have MPD, er Multiple > Personality Disorder. This is what I got in part: > ===8<--- > Regist

Re: Bayes not working

On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 16:01 Steven Stern wrote: > I imported a corpus of about 2 messages total and it wasn't > working. I blew it all away and started from scratch thinking that > was the problem.  For now, local.cf has a minimum of 100 messages of > each type. The current database exceeds

Re: Strange Bayes results

On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 17:08 Bowie Bailey wrote: > Yes, this user is set with all the default options for Bayes learning > and a spam threshold of 5.0.  The entire Bayes database was created > via autolearn for this user. Is that possible at all? I though that bayes to work you need 200 ham +

RE: Latest sa-stats from last week

jdow wrote: > From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Michael Monnerie wrote: > > > On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 16:18 Bowie Bailey wrote: > > > > I've got per-user Bayes and most of my users > > > > don't bother to train it. > > > > > > Another reason for site-wide bayes, I'd say. > > > > I'

Re: limit child process

On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 14:27 Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > and what would be an ideal number to set it  ? How many do you have right now? > I came in this morning ,  got a bunch of those swap message , and my > VM is at 86% right now And which processes consume your memory, and how much? mfg zmi

RE: Latest sa-stats from last week

Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 23:01 Bowie Bailey wrote: > > Hmm... If you are training Bayes, and all of your ham is in English, > > then what does Bayes do with the Chinese ham your customers get? > > Nothing. But you won't get a SPAM report from bayes if the e-mail is > chin

RE: Strange Bayes results

Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 23:32 Bowie Bailey wrote: > > And as an additional data point, I found this for one of our > > internal users who has never done any manual training: > > RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM > > -

RE: Strange Bayes results

Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 23:14 Bowie Bailey wrote: > > When I look at the overall stats, bayes does pretty good: > > RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM > > > >6BAYES_9926754

RE: limit child process

Title: RE: limit child process > -Original Message- > From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 8:28 AM > To: ; Matt Kettler > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: RE: limit child process > > > >  > | Spamd calls it, > | > | Bu

Re: whitelist_from_rcvd not working

Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > Can someone point out what I am doing wrong hereI have this in my > local.cf file: > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail*.magnetmail.net > > But messages are getting blocked that I believe should match this? > What about the below suggests this mail is [E

Re: Bayes not working

Andy Spiegl wrote: [3320] dbg: bayes: corpus size: nspam = 178, nham = 168 Probably because your corpus is still too small. man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf ... bayes_min_ham_num(Default: 200) bayes_min_spam_num (Default: 200) To be accurate, the Bayes sy

Re: Bayes not working

> [3320] dbg: bayes: corpus size: nspam = 178, nham = 168 Probably because your corpus is still too small. man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf ... bayes_min_ham_num(Default: 200) bayes_min_spam_num (Default: 200) To be accurate, the Bayes system does not activate un

whitelist_from_rcvd not working

Can someone point out what I am doing wrong hereI have this in my local.cf file: whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail*.magnetmail.net But messages are getting blocked that I believe should match this? May 5 14:54:19 esmtp postfix/smtpd[994]: 9315B7FA20: client=mail10.magnetmail.net[2

Re: Spamassassin + Kaspersky SMTP-Scanner

Thomas Gross wrote: Hi List! I'm runing a debian mailserver with qmail 1.03, vpopmail and kaspersky anti-virus smtp-scanner 5.5.3. Now i wanted to add the latest spamassassin to filter the spam which grows up to 500 mails per day. I searched the whole internet for a possible config

RE: Bayes not working

You will probably get more ideas from posters, but here is my thought. Are you running spamassassin -D --lint as the user that SA runs under when it is running live? For instance, I call SA with the user "filter", not the user "root". So, to properly test SA I have to first type: su filter This

RE: limit child process

| Spamd calls it, | | But I have seen my monitor , on more than one occasion, with this error, | | swap_pager_getswapspace: failed | | and the worst part is I don't realize it until I hit the KVM switch , and | actually get on the console - | | so can I customize spamd to a lower limit? |

Bayes not working

On a new SA installation that's as identical to the other 3 we have running as possible, bayes is not running. spamassassin -D --lint indicates that all is normal. The test message generates a Bayes score. sa-learn is able to talk to the mysql database: We're able to update the database using sa

Re: Spamassassin + Kaspersky SMTP-Scanner

On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 13:19 Thomas Gross wrote: > Has anyone a solution for that ? I have this for postfix, but not qmail. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660/4156531 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "lynx -sou

Spamassassin + Kaspersky SMTP-Scanner

Hi List!   I'm runing a debian mailserver with qmail 1.03, vpopmail and kaspersky anti-virus smtp-scanner 5.5.3.   Now i wanted to add the latest spamassassin to filter the spam which grows up to 500 mails per day.   I searched the whole internet for a possible configuration with no result.  

RE: Nasty bug? in 3.1.1 headers inserting?

Thanks for all of your replies. Think I should have kept a closer eye on the milter. I use DAG WIers packages for RHEL3 and he doesn;t have the 0.3.1 available yet. Never cared to look whether there was an update of the milter and therefor missed the issue. Appologies for any inconveniences o

Re: Nasty bug? in 3.1.1 headers inserting?

Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes: > On 5/9/2006 2:16 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > > There's some difference of opinion around this question, but my general > > opinion is that there should be an update to spamass-milter which > > properly handles the newlines either way. I'm not sure whether or not >