Hi Robar
It is sad but it is true that the large groups of women are unhappy with
the size of there BF is thing. Don't be that guy,
www.missusoandforever.org/ab1/ .
and station, designed been grabbed theorized to artist
Thank you
i run rules
TRUSTED_RULESETS="SARE_STOCKS TRIPWIRE SARE_EVILNUMBERS0 SARE_EVILNUMBERS1 BOGUSVIRUS SARE_ADULT SARE_FRAUD SARE_BML SARE_SPOOF SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM SARE_OEM SARE_RANDOM SARE_HEA
DER SARE_HTML SARE_SPECIFIC SARE_OBFU SARE_REDIRECT SARE_GENLSUBJ SARE_UNSUB SARE_WHITELIST";
on my account I get about 10 spams a day scoring below a 3 out of 50 spams total (thats a guess)
I will try moving the ham threshold down.
and no I haven't done any bayes training. and dns is working.
some stats for my box for one week
I block using sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, or spamassass catches, or clamav rejects about 45,000 emails. "ham" email w/ a score of 3 or less is about 9,000
On 5/10/06, Jay Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bazooka Joe wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_60 autolearn=ham
version=3.0.4
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on agwebinc.com
I have required of 3 which you can see and i have the milter rejecting email w/ score more than 7
On 5/10/06, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Bazooka Joe wrote:
> more and more i am seeing spam marked as autolearn=ham
>
> I was wondering the best way to correct this?
Depends.. Really you first need to figure out why it this happened before you
take any action at all.
Can you post a X-Spam-Status header for one of the messages?
Have you modified the required_score, or any of the learning thresholds in your
config?
In general there are only a few rules that can cause a message to be tagged as
spam, but do not count toward the computation of score for learning purposes.
*_IN_BLACKLIST, AWL, BAYES_*, and GTUBE are the most noteworthy ones.
You can set bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam in local.cf to be 0 or a negative number, then autolearn=ham won't kick in unless it's below a certain score (not sure if this counts bayes or not). But yes, the real question is why are no rules triggering... Is DNS working? Are you using the blacklist rules, etc? What does the spam look like?
Jay
