On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 17:08 Bowie Bailey wrote: > Yes, this user is set with all the default options for Bayes learning > and a spam threshold of 5.0. The entire Bayes database was created > via autolearn for this user.
Is that possible at all? I though that bayes to work you need 200 ham + 200 spam first. > It seems to me that Bayes is highly sensitive to the types of ham and > spam that each user gets. This user has a near perfect Bayes > database created with autolearn. No false positives or negatives and > 95% of spam hit by BAYES_99. My account, on the other hand, has a > few false positives and only a 66% spam hit rate despite aggressive > manual training. I had on offlist discussion with somebody, we tried to compare our setup and results. I'll post this as a separate thread tonight or tomorrow, I've gotta go now. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660/4156531 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "lynx -source http://zmi.at/zmi3.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: 44A3 C1EC B71E C71A B4C2 9AA6 C818 847C 55CB A4EE // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x55CBA4EE
pgpIOn4NkgBU5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
