On Thursday 09 February 2006 22:45, jdow wrote:
>From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On Thursday 09 February 2006 03:47, jdow wrote:
>>From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
Procmail calls SpamAssasin and feeds the return off to the spool
file.
>>>
>>> Ok, sub getmail for both
DAve wrote:
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
Ok,
Just do what Matt said and pass the username to spamc with the -u
option. It'll do exactly what you want.
I don't understand what Daryl and Matt are saying by the above?
Yes, I believe I have the same basic setup as you. I run spamd on a
c
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
Ok,
Just do what Matt said and pass the username to spamc with the -u
option. It'll do exactly what you want.
I don't understand what Daryl and Matt are saying by the above?
Yes, I believe I have the same basic setup as you. I run spamd on a
central server an
From: "Ronan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
how much difference would it make if the spamd server was rewritten to
use pcre. Obviously this wuold run x10 s of times faster than the
current perl native implementation.
Feel free to try. I'd not make a single tenth penny bet it would run
faster let along
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thursday 09 February 2006 03:47, jdow wrote:
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Procmail calls SpamAssasin and feeds the return off to the spool
file.
Ok, sub getmail for both fetchmail and procmail, since getmail can
handle the SA pipeing yo
Ok,
Just do what Matt said and pass the username to spamc with the -u
option. It'll do exactly what you want.
I don't understand what Daryl and Matt are saying by the above?
Remember this is a system wide installation and not just running for my
account. I don't know where I would set sp
On Thursday 09 February 2006 16:30, mouss wrote:
>Gene Heskett a écrit :
>> On Thursday 09 February 2006 03:47, jdow wrote:
>>>From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>Procmail calls SpamAssasin and feeds the return off to the spool
>file.
Ok, sub getmail for both fetchmail an
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 22:36 +0100, mouss wrote:
> Craig White a écrit :
> >
> > oops...meant to send to list...
> >
> > and by all means...
> >
> > setup dovecot for maildir
> >
> > use IMAP not POP3 for you local email. IMAP frees you from tying your
> > email experience to one program on
It might be relevant to this discussion that we've developed a drop-in wrapper
acceleration application that uses our specialized hardware to get between 8 and 570
(depending on rules used) times the performance of SpamAssassin on its own.
We tried libpcre for comparison and as people here spec
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
> - Original Message -
> >> Has anyone got any idea's on this? No one responded to my
> >> first post on it.
> >> ---
> >> I'm using a script to pipe messages to spamc. Out of
> >> about 90,000 messages passed to spamc via the script
> >> about 7,
Jim Smith wrote:
> I'm getting lots of spam that are skipping rules. One that came in
> recently with lots of porn only got tagged for SORBS, NUMERIC HELO,
> and UNPARSEABLE RELAY (I don't know what unparseable relay means but
> seems like many emails have that lately). The full headers & message
>
This message does not hit any naughty words rules for me either (tested
3.1.0 and 3.0.3). SA doesn't generally have rules that hit a single
word. To avoid FPs, it is better to check for phrases and obfuscations.
However, the message does hit BAYES_99 and several networks tests on my
system g
While working on scaling problems I needed to match spamc's debugging
output with spamd's. That is laborious when you've got multiple MX
hosts connecting to multiple spamd hosts.
This patch to spamc.c reveals the port number from which spamc
connects to spamd. Spamd already logs the same, so ma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Randy Smith wrote:
Then I run spamc like so:
spamc -s 512000 -u $RECIPIENT
$RECIPIENT is set by my MTA and is replaced with the user's account
name.
[snip]
What do you do for mail with multiple recipients?
In my case, postfix breaks the message out fo
Jim Smith wrote:
I'm getting lots of spam that are skipping rules. One that came in recently
with lots of porn only got tagged for SORBS, NUMERIC HELO, and UNPARSEABLE
RELAY (I don't know what unparseable relay means but seems like many emails
have that lately).
UNPARSEABLE_RELAY means that, w
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
Matt:
True.. And that username CAN be specified by spamc -u. Spamc passes it
to spamd,
spamd uses it when calling SQL.
Quoting from the SPAMc man page:
-u username
This argument has been semi-obsoleted. To have spamd use
per-user-config file
I'm getting lots of spam that are skipping rules. One that came in recently
with lots of porn only got tagged for SORBS, NUMERIC HELO, and UNPARSEABLE
RELAY (I don't know what unparseable relay means but seems like many emails
have that lately). The full headers & message (uncensored) of that examp
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 07:54 -0500, Payal Rathod wrote:
> Hi,
> >From 4-5 days I have been receiving a lot of spams, 100s of them with
> weird subjects like, Re: a f news 141, Re: K R news 721, Re: B l news
> 203 etc.
> I have with bayes learned alteast 200 of them, but they are still pouring in.
Matt:
True.. And that username CAN be specified by spamc -u. Spamc passes it to spamd,
spamd uses it when calling SQL.
Quoting from the SPAMc man page:
-u username
This argument has been semi-obsoleted. To have spamd use
per-user-config files, run spamc as the user
- Original Message -
>> Has anyone got any idea's on this? No one responded to my
>> first post on it.
>> ---
>> I'm using a script to pipe messages to spamc. Out of
>> about 90,000 messages passed to spamc via the script
>> about 7,000 failed with an error code of 74.
>>
>> What does sp
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
> Matt:
>
> Correct, however it is SPAMD that makes the call to the SQL database if
> I am not mistaken, and there is a convention of passing username with in
> the message.
True.. And that username CAN be specified by spamc -u. Spamc passes it to spamd,
spamd uses it w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Randy Smith wrote:
>> Then I run spamc like so:
>>
>> spamc -s 512000 -u $RECIPIENT
>>
>> $RECIPIENT is set by my MTA and is replaced with the user's account
>> name.
>>
>> [snip]
>
> What do you do for mail with multiple recipients?
>
You either have to accept t
Matt:
Correct, however it is SPAMD that makes the call to the SQL database if
I am not mistaken, and there is a convention of passing username with in
the message. What I want to have happen is each time SPAMd runs a
distributed spam check I would like it to take the To: address, use that
to
Randy Smith wrote:
> Then I run spamc like so:
>
> spamc -s 512000 -u $RECIPIENT
>
> $RECIPIENT is set by my MTA and is replaced with the user's account
> name.
>
> [snip]
What do you do for mail with multiple recipients?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
Matt:
Thanks, yeah, ideally as each peice of email is being scanned by
SPAMc/SPAMd it would change users and grab the userprefs from the SQL
database.
That's fairly simple. I use that same setup on my systems. I run spamd
with these flags.
spamd -x -d -q
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
> Matt:
>
> Thanks, yeah, ideally as each peice of email is being scanned by
> SPAMc/SPAMd it would change users and grab the userprefs from the SQL
> database.
Ok, well then pass it to spamc..
why are you trying to pass spamd a per-message parameter?
That can't and w
Lisa Casey wrote:
> I'm having the same trouble with SARE_STOCKS. I have added it to
> Trusty Rulesets, but when I run rules_du_jour I get this:
>
>
> No index found for ruleset named SARE_STOCKS. Check that this
> ruleset is still valid.
> No files updated; No restart required.
do you have ver
Matt:
Thanks, yeah, ideally as each peice of email is being scanned by
SPAMc/SPAMd it would change users and grab the userprefs from the SQL
database.
HFC
Matt Kettler wrote:
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
I am trying to integrate spamassassin and Scalix. At this point I don't
see anyway
Hi All,
Spam Ass wrote:
On 2/9/06, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The best and easiest way is to use RulesDuJour. This will let you
> update most of the third-party rulesets automatically on a regular
> basis (including all of the SARE rules).
>
> http://www.exit0.us/index.php?page
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 3:58 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: REPOST:Need some help with - EX_IOERR 74 input/output error
>
> Has anyone got any idea's on this? No one responded to my
>
Has anyone got any idea's on this? No one responded to my
first post on it.
---
I'm using a script to pipe messages to spamc. Out of about
90,000 messages passed to spamc via the script about 7,000
failed with an error code of 74.
What does spamc mean by EX_IOERR?
Is this a failure between my scr
Justin Mason a écrit :
>
>
> There was an attempt several years back, by one of the MPlayer guys iirc.
> It might be worth searching archives for that if you're still interested.
>
> For what it's worth, I can tell you with almost 100% certainty that it's
> pointless. It may reduce memory usage
Rodney Richison a écrit :
> Is there a tool or howto to let users easily remove themselves? And for
> that matter, allow employees to add ip's. :)
>
I guess No. Now, employees/users should not modify the rbldnsd data,
since this data is "global", and also because that would mean reloading
data (
Craig White a écrit :
>
> oops...meant to send to list...
>
> and by all means...
>
> setup dovecot for maildir
>
> use IMAP not POP3 for you local email. IMAP frees you from tying your
> email experience to one program on one computer and makes all programs
> on all computer on your networ
Gene Heskett a écrit :
> On Thursday 09 February 2006 03:47, jdow wrote:
>
>>From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
Procmail calls SpamAssasin and feeds the return off to the spool
file.
>>>
>>>Ok, sub getmail for both fetchmail and procmail, since getmail can
>>>handle the SA pipeing
Gene Heskett wrote:
Further reading on fetchmail tells me that it hands the incoming mail
off to sendmail via stuffing it into port 110. Datapoint as I try to
get my head around the mechanics of this.
Er, I think you mean "..stuffing it into port 25.". Port 110 is where
fetchmail connects t
Spam Ass wrote:
> Disregard this question. Appearantly RDJ was not updating itself as
> I thought it would... SARE_STOCKS updates fine with the newest
> version.
In that case, you can also disregard my answer. :)
--
Bowie
Spam Ass wrote:
> On 2/9/06, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The best and easiest way is to use RulesDuJour. This will let you
> > update most of the third-party rulesets automatically on a regular
> > basis (including all of the SARE rules).
> >
> > http://www.exit0.us/index.php?page
Disregard this question. Appearantly RDJ was not updating itself as I thought it would... SARE_STOCKS updates fine with the newest version.IanOn 2/9/06,
Spam Ass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/9/06, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The best and easiest way is to use RulesDuJour. This w
On 2/9/06, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The best and easiest way is to use RulesDuJour. This will let youupdate most of the third-party rulesets automatically on a regular basis(including all of the SARE rules).
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJourIs anyone else not gettin
'Payal Rathod' wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:46:02AM -0500, Chris Santerre wrote:
>> With regard to enabling URIBL:
>> http://www.uribl.com/usage.shtml
>
> I put the listing given on the page in local.cf but in logs I get an
> error as,
>
> Feb 9 14:57:51 dc2 spamd[20236]: Failed to run U
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:46:02AM -0500, Chris Santerre wrote:
> With regard to enabling URIBL:
> http://www.uribl.com/usage.shtml
I put the listing given on the page in local.cf but in logs I get an
error as,
Feb 9 14:57:51 dc2 spamd[20236]: Failed to run URIBL_GREY SpamAssassin
test, skippi
On Thursday 09 February 2006 03:47, jdow wrote:
>From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>>Procmail calls SpamAssasin and feeds the return off to the spool
>>> file.
>>
>> Ok, sub getmail for both fetchmail and procmail, since getmail can
>> handle the SA pipeing you are doing with procmail. T
I would rather use wget than curl (curl has too many pre-reqs)
Sorry not to answer the question and go off on an tangent, but what
requirements does curl have that you can't install? If you build from
source, about the only requirement that may not be on any stock system would
be OpenSSL, and
I'm trying to get rulesdejour going
here and having one heck of a time making it through my proxy.
I would rather use wget than curl (curl
has too many pre-reqs), and have it installed and configured
to access the proxy server. I
have the proxy_user and proxy_password configured in my
/usr/loc
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
> I am trying to integrate spamassassin and Scalix. At this point I don't
> see anyway of passing a username so that spamd will be able to base it's
> query on. It is possible to configure spamd to use the "to:" address as
> the username? It appears from everything tha
Roger Jochem wrote:
> Where do I upgrade my spamassassin cf files to the latest versions?
The best and easiest way is to use RulesDuJour. This will let you
update most of the third-party rulesets automatically on a regular basis
(including all of the SARE rules).
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pa
You're not upgrading the rules that come with SA. You're adding to them.
Many of the SARE rules are almost required to get decent results. Go to:
http://www.rulesemporium.com
Download the rulesets you want, and put them in /etc/mail/spamassassin.
Restart SA, your results should improve dram
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"John Hall" writes:
> "Ronan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > how much difference would it make if the spamd server was rewritten to use
> > pcre. Obviously this wuold run x10 s of times faster than the current p
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:40:51PM -0500, Benjamin Adams wrote:
> I try updating my rules using sa-update
> [19602] dbg: dns: query failed: 0.1.3.updates.spamassassin.org =>
> NXDOMAIN
> [19602] dbg: channel: no updates available, skipping channel
[...]
> anyone else having this problem?
There a
I try updating my rules using sa-updateI get [19602] dbg: dns: query failed: 0.1.3.updates.spamassassin.org => NXDOMAIN[19602] dbg: channel: no updates available, skipping channel[19602] dbg: diag: updates complete, exiting with code 0spamassassin --versionSpamAssassin version 3.1.0 running on Perl
Where do I upgrade my spamassassin cf files to the latest versions? Sorry if
this is a dumb question...
- Original Message -
From: "Craig Baird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Payal Rathod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: lots of new spam
The
These are one of the latest stock spam variations. I was getting a gazillion
of these when they first started. I upgraded to the latest copy of
70_sare_stocks.cf, and I don't think I've seen one since. Note that you do
need the *latest* version of 70_sare_stocks.cf. I was running an older on
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:24:58PM -, John Hall wrote:
> "Ronan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >
> > Anyone have any input on this? What would be the implications? Should it
> > just be a straight translation perl -> c , or are there other factors?
>
> Ronan,
>
> Why would using pc
I am trying to integrate spamassassin and Scalix. At this point I don't
see anyway of passing a username so that spamd will be able to base it's
query on. It is possible to configure spamd to use the "to:" address as
the username? It appears from everything that I have read, you have to
pass
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:47:04AM -0500, Mike Sturdee wrote:
> I am getting thousands of these lines in my logs on all servers running
> SA.
>
> spamd[52549]: Unknown digest hash code at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/Mail/DomainKeys/Key/Public.pm line
> 178, line 74.
>
> Any ideas?
I am getting thousands of these lines in my logs on all servers running
SA.
spamd[52549]: Unknown digest hash code at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/Mail/DomainKeys/Key/Public.pm line
178, line 74.
("" AND "line ##" vary)
OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE & 6.0-STABLE
SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (fro
It's sleeping. Here's the code that's doing it:
# If we're not running interactively, add a random delay here. This
should
# help reduce spikes on the servers hosting the rulesets (Thanks, Bob)
MAXDELAY=3600;
DELAY=0;
[ ! -t 0 ] && [ ${MAXDELAY} -gt 0 ] && let DELAY="${RANDOM} %
${MAXDELAY}";
[
Gene Heskett wrote:
See above, half a gig, interleaved access. pc1600 I think, haven't
looked since last year when I blew the dust bunnies out in its annual
blow job.
The P3 boxes I've been running have PC133 memory, the domain
hosting box is ECC EDO (yes, both) PC100 IIRC. (It's a Compaq
"Ronan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> how much difference would it make if the spamd server was rewritten to use
> pcre. Obviously this wuold run x10 s of times faster than the current perl
> native implementation.
>
> I presume other people have considered this
Ronan wrote:
> how much difference would it make if the spamd server was rewritten to
> use pcre. Obviously this wuold run x10 s of times faster than the
> current perl native implementation.
>
> I presume other people have considered this and decided against it for
> various reasons as I cant seem
Run top on the machines running spamd. If load is high, but there are
regular amounts of CPU idling, then network tests are slowing the
processes down and your servers aren't working to their potential. In
which case, have more spamd children ready to handle more simultaneous
activity, which may re
Title: RE: lots of new spam
> -Original Message-
> From: Payal Rathod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 9:35 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: lots of new spam
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:32:32AM -0500, JamesDR wrote:
> > Yes, y
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:32:32AM -0500, JamesDR wrote:
> Yes, you have something missconfigured, Bayes is poisoned, net test
> are failing and/or you don't have URIBL's enabled.
What does Bayes poisoning mean? And how do I enable URIBL?
With warm regards,
-Payal
how much difference would it make if the spamd server was rewritten to
use pcre. Obviously this wuold run x10 s of times faster than the
current perl native implementation.
I presume other people have considered this and decided against it for
various reasons as I cant seem to find any referen
Payal Rathod wrote:
Hi,
From 4-5 days I have been receiving a lot of spams, 100s of them with
weird subjects like, Re: a f news 141, Re: K R news 721, Re: B l news
203 etc.
I have with bayes learned alteast 200 of them, but they are still pouring in.
Any ideas on their blocking?
With warm rega
Is there a tool or howto to let users easily remove themselves? And for
that matter, allow employees to add ip's. :)
--
Highest Regards,
Rodney Richison
RCR Computing
http://www.rcrnet.net
118 N. Broadway
Cleveland, OK 74020
918-358-
Howdy,
Having an issue running RDJ out of cron. System is SunFire 280R
running Solaris 9, bash is located at /bin/bash, and the RDJ script
is v1.28. Running the script from the command line, it executes and
does all it's supposed to do. I put an entry in root's crontab, and
it starts exec
Hi,
>From 4-5 days I have been receiving a lot of spams, 100s of them with
weird subjects like, Re: a f news 141, Re: K R news 721, Re: B l news
203 etc.
I have with bayes learned alteast 200 of them, but they are still pouring in.
Any ideas on their blocking?
With warm regards,
-Payal
Hi all,
our company is located in Germany and most of our employees' email
communication is exclusevily in German language.
Some of my colleagues suggested I should configure SpamAssassin to
consider all non-German incoming email as spam.
Problem: there are a few employees (including me) wh
On Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2006 22:12 Mike Jackson wrote:
> You might try using SMTP-AUTH instead of
> (or alongside) POP-before-SMTP to see if it corrects the issue, as
> long as your users' mail clients will support it (and if their client
> doesn't support it, make them get a better mail client).
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Procmail calls SpamAssasin and feeds the return off to the spool file.
Ok, sub getmail for both fetchmail and procmail, since getmail can
handle the SA pipeing you are doing with procmail. Then run dovecot on
that box to serve kmail on this box? I h
72 matches
Mail list logo
