-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi matt,
Matt Kettler wrote:
> OpenMacNews wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> why do these:
>>
>> http://paste.lisp.org/display/13918
>>
>> score so low? (using SA r348087 ...)
>
> Are you using URIBLS? I got 2 surbl hits from the URL in that message
>
>
At 08:55 PM 11/26/2005, Jon Armitage wrote:
How many of you think that an email with a subject containing the F-word
isn't spam?
Subject: I fucked up the 1.0.4 branch checkin, can you re-merge widget.cpp?"
Nope. Not spam. Crude, and inappropriate in some professional environments,
but not spa
At 08:47 PM 11/26/2005, Dave Pooser wrote:
Did you edit your v310.pre file? DCC is disabled (like Razor) by default
because they're not open source.
Not true. Their open/closed source nature has nothing to do with it.
They're disabled because they're not free for all users to use in an
unlimi
Graham Murray wrote:
"Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Of course, my business DSL provider could be less brain dead and not
set a 30 min TTL for their entire forward zone (and 1 day for their
reverse zone), but I suspect there are lots of people out there in the
same situation.
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 25 November 2005 19:09, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Too bad the telco is the only game in town. At least their DNS servers
haven't been rooted this week (yet, anyway).
I'm sure glad you added the (yet, anyway) qualification Daryl, cause
they do get it, regularly.
>> I ran SA in debug mode
>> and it doesnt say anything about DCC available, but I installed it and
>> opened the required ports.
>
> Did you edit your v310.pre file? DCC is disabled (like Razor) by default
> because they're not open source.
>
> Also, a spam threshold of 3 is going to hit a LOT of
>>*ALL* body rules in SpamAssassin will match the subject line too. SA
>>does this automatically in the code itself.
This simply isn't true. Or at least if it is true, SA is scoring the
magic words (you all know the ones I mean, referring to very warm ladies
of dubious virtue, the attributes o
> I ran SA in debug mode
> and it doesnt say anything about DCC available, but I installed it and
> opened the required ports.
Did you edit your v310.pre file? DCC is disabled (like Razor) by default
because they're not open source.
Also, a spam threshold of 3 is going to hit a LOT of false posi
> At 07:28 PM 11/26/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>I am noticing emails that should be spam not getting marked as spam. The
>>score is 3 and these types of emails are getting 2.1, 2.4 scores and
>>getting through our filters. Any suggestions?
>
> Are you running any network tests? RBLs? Razor/py
At 07:28 PM 11/26/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am noticing emails that should be spam not getting marked as spam. The
score is 3 and these types of emails are getting 2.1, 2.4 scores and
getting through our filters. Any suggestions?
Are you running any network tests? RBLs? Razor/pyzor/dcc?
From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jdow wrote on Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:56:19 -0800:
It appears Earthlink is rearranging a lot of their servers
I don't know what their outbound mail servers were yesterday
or half a year ago or last year. I don't even know what their outbound
mailserver
Jdow wrote on Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:56:19 -0800:
> It appears Earthlink is rearranging a lot of their servers
I don't know what their outbound mail servers were yesterday
or half a year ago or last year. I don't even know what their outbound
mailservers are today. Calling them "popxx.domain" do
Markus Braun wrote on Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:36:57 +:
> Can i turn it of or is some configuration error?
Since you do not provide any information apart from software names, nobody
can tell you. Go to spamassassin.org or wiki.spamassassin.org and check if
there's a tutorial specifically for you
From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jdow wrote on Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:39:42 -0800:
No, that is an improper assumption.
Well, if you do a little more research and go to SORBS and check that IP
you see that it's been in the db since June! If you do even more research
and query all known
Jdow wrote on Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:39:42 -0800:
> No, that is an improper assumption.
Well, if you do a little more research and go to SORBS and check that IP
you see that it's been in the db since June! If you do even more research
and query all known RBLs you find that it's been in NJABL since
Jdow wrote on Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:39:42 -0800:
> They are using this as a means of
> randomizing access to the dozen or so mail servers for earthlink.net.
You mean they randomly rotate these IPs? That *is* dynamic.
> How about making sure the access to their mail servers is not all
> directed
16 matches
Mail list logo
