Re: this is my local.cf file but there is no SPAM Status in the email header i received

Find a test message somewhere. Then use it with "spamc > Ok i already delete those line and started spamd > but i dont think it is working > > On 7/1/05, jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: report_header 1 > > config: SpamAssassin failed to pa

Re: how do train SpamAssassin

You must realize that the local.cf file is NOT overwritten by upgrades. This is specifically mentioned in the notes. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "liyas_m m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > i installed new version completely...overiding the latest version.

Re: how do train SpamAssassin

i meant ..overriding the OLD version On 7/1/05, liyas_m m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i installed new version completely...overiding the latest version. > > > On 7/1/05, jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Per last message - did you just upgrade from a very old spamassassin > > or did someone c

Re: this is my local.cf file but there is no SPAM Status in the email header i received

Ok i already delete those line and started spamd but i dont think it is working On 7/1/05, jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: report_header 1 > config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: detailed_phrase_score 1 > config: SpamAssassin fa

Re: how do train SpamAssassin

i installed new version completely...overiding the latest version. On 7/1/05, jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Per last message - did you just upgrade from a very old spamassassin > or did someone cleverly overwrite your /usr/mail/spamassassin/local.cf > file with something spurious? > > The th

Re: how do train SpamAssassin

Per last message - did you just upgrade from a very old spamassassin or did someone cleverly overwrite your /usr/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file with something spurious? The three items that failed to parse are not valid in 3.0.4. And there is a score defined for a rule that does not or no longer

Re: this is my local.cf file but there is no SPAM Status in the email header i received

config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: report_header 1 config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: detailed_phrase_score 1 config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: spam_level_stars 1 warning: score set for non-existent rule MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE So what these line

Re: how do train SpamAssassin

running spamassassin --lint gives me these config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: report_header 1 config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: detailed_phrase_score 1 config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: spam_level_stars 1 warning: score set for non-existent r

Re: this is my local.cf file but there is no SPAM Status in the email header i received

running spamassassin --lint -D < /dev/null gives me these i m calling SA with this spamc or rather spamd daemon... debug: SpamAssassin version 3.0.4 debug: Score set 0 chosen. debug: running in taint mode? yes debug: Running in taint mode, removing unsafe env vars, and resetting PATH debug: PATH

Re: error: Insecure dependency in eval while running setuid at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 2119._ , continuing

Geez I hate Bugzilla and its searches that do not work. SO I don't know if this was a duplicate or not. It now has number 4445. It is a particularly annoying bug. (A search for "SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 2119" returned a bazillion hits the first dozen of which did not match. Sheesh what a

Re: this is my local.cf file but there is no SPAM Status in the email header i received

On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 10:59:37AM +0800, liyas_m m wrote: > blacklist_from 161.139.100.0/24 218.111.166.74 218.111.177.103 blacklist_from is for from addresses, not IPs or IP ranges. See "perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf". > detailed_phrase_score 1 I've never seen that as an option. > spam_le

this is my local.cf file but there is no SPAM Status in the email header i received

rewrite_header subject ***SPAM(_SCORE_)*** required_hits 5.0 report_safe 2 score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 1.0 blacklist_from 161.139.100.0/24 218.111.166.74 218.111.177.103 lock_method flock allow_user_rules 0 report_header 1 detailed_phrase_score 1 spam_level_stars 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 What should i

Re: [ZZ Missed] Re: Aren't these headers interesting....

Indeed - it seems to be the PerMsgStatus.pm line 2119 (security problem with user_prefs containing "full" rules) bug let it through. Now, just how I am not at all sure. There is supposed to be a trap, that ZZ-Missed markup, shown in the subject line and then it feeds through a niced regular spamass

Re: Aren't these headers interesting....

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Now, SpamAssassin here is not run before the "X-BOO:" (name obfuscated) > header. And SpamAssassin markup is supposed to happen after that point. > It appears this sailed right through without SpamAssassin remarking it. > Now to go to procmail and s

Aren't these headers interesting....

===8<--- Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by morticia.wizardess.wiz (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j610vrLL025440 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:57:53 -0700 Status: OU Received: from smtp.earthlink.net [209.86.93.202] by l

Re: RCVD_IN_RSP_TRUSTED indeed....

jdow wrote: > Methinks this list of trusted locations needs some fixup. The first part > of the very long message follows: How strange.. I have numerous users that intentionally subscribe to ediets... I even use them as a ham training source. I wonder if they've got a stupid single-email signup t

Re: List with all spam tests for database import

Thomas Booms wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm new on this list since a few minutes. > > I've written a small web interface to easy manage the possible anti spam > settings within a mysql database. To not typing or converting many > hundreds of spam test lines like its shown on the website, I want to get

Re: e-mail size limits

In an older episode (Thursday 30 June 2005 18:55), Robert Swan wrote: > message_size_limit = 2048 > > to the main.cf and we are all set to 20MB now.. From my experience with postfix, I would suggest to use something like 3000 to be able to actually receive attachments with a file size o

Re: Maybe OT: SA/amavisd-new not killing

What do you have set for $final_spam_destiny? It should be D_DISCARD if you want amavisd-new to discard the message which has higher score then the kill level. BQ. *gasp* Oh no! mailgate etc # grep final_spam_destiny amavisd.conf $final_spam_destiny = D_PASS; # (defaults to D_REJECT)

SOLVED: Re: Maybe OT: SA/amavisd-new not killing

What do you have set for $final_spam_destiny? It should be D_DISCARD if you want amavisd-new to discard the message which has higher score then the kill level. BQ. BQ, you da man (or wo-man, whatever the case may be.) that solved it! Jun 30 14:09:24 mailgate amavis[27766]: (27766-02) ESMTP:

Re: Auto learn function

Michael wrote: Somehow when I type in the following I get this: Is that the whole debug information that I supposed to get ?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# spamassassin -D debug: SpamAssassin version 3.0.4 debug: Score set 0 chosen. debug: running in taint mode? yes debug: Running in taint mode, re

Re: Auto learn function

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 03:53:45PM -0400, Michael wrote: > Somehow when I type in the following I get this: > Is that the whole debug information that I supposed to get ?? You need to send a message through it. Otherwise it'll sit waiting for STDIN. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Real program

Re: Auto learn function

Somehow when I type in the following I get this: Is that the whole debug information that I supposed to get ??   [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# spamassassin -Ddebug: SpamAssassin version 3.0.4debug: Score set 0 chosen.debug: running in taint mode? yesdebug: Running in taint mode, removing unsafe

Re: Auto learn function

Michael wrote: Thats the thing it always says autolearn=no. Even though the options are set in local.cf. There is one thing i had to do. I removed -a option when spamd is starting because it could start with -a option givin me error that "-a has been removed and i should look for use_auto_white

Re: Auto learn function

"Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/30/2005 02:18:14 PM: > Is there any way to check if the autolearn function is on besides > the line bayes_auto_learn 1 in local.cf ? > I`m asking because i have the option bayes_auto_learn set to 1 and i > dont think its working. Check your maillog, you

Re: Auto learn function

Thats the thing it always says autolearn=no. Even though the options are set in local.cf. There is one thing i had to do. I removed -a option when spamd is starting because it could start with -a option givin me error that "-a has been removed and i should look for use_auto_whitelist configurati

Re: Auto learn function

Michael wrote: Is there any way to check if the autolearn function is on besides the line bayes_auto_learn 1 in local.cf ? I`m asking because i have the option bayes_auto_learn set to 1 and i dont think its working. If you check the headers of each email you should see something like: X-Spam-

Auto learn function

Is there any way to check if the autolearn function is on besides the line bayes_auto_learn 1 in local.cf ? I`m asking because i have the option bayes_auto_learn set to 1 and i dont think its working.

RE: e-mail size limits

Thanks it was postfix default of 1024000, I guess it had me confused because it didn’t specify. So I added message_size_limit = 2048 to the main.cf and we are all set to 20MB now..       thanks all for you help   Robert             Peace he would say instead of goodby

Re: A training issue of good vs bad

Dr Robert Young wrote: > I have verified that the installation I am taking over has Spamssassin > 2.63. It was trained (I presume) on good & bad emails about 1-2 yrs ago. > SPAM has been "automatically" collected from users and fed back into the > system. However, there has been no updating on the

Re: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available!

slight inconsistency/error in UPGRADE file. Note for Users Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.1.0 --- ok Note for Users Upgrading from SpamAssassin 3.0.x that is actually either: Note for Users Upgrading to Spam

FW: e-mail size limits

Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You have to add line in postfix/main.cf > ie.1024 is default which is 10MB > > message_size_limit = your number here Given that the OP said he's running Postfix - not sendmail - this is probably more to the point (sheepish grin) -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at

Re: e-mail size limits

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:21:58AM -0500, Andy Jezierski wrote: > Yep, like both Matt's have said it's your MTA that doing it. But I think > your original post said you were running Postfix, so look for the postfix > equivalent. FWIW, something like: mailbox_size_limit = 102400 message_siz

RE: e-mail size limits

"Matthew Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/30/2005 11:19:13 AM: > > > From: Robert Swan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >    I have recently taken over administration of a Spamassassin > server that is running RedHat 9, and Spamassassin 3.04, spamd, spamc, >

Re: 70_sc_top200.cf not updated

SARE has started using SVN to maintain the rulesets, however the top200 script hasn't been updated to commit to SVN. The "maintainer" of the script is starting a business right now and hasn't had time to update the script! Shelley Waltz wrote: The 70_sc_top200.cf on rulesemporium has not b

Re: How can I get the spam score to appear alone in the header

Erwin Zavala wrote: > like X-Spam-Score = 5.3 > add_header all Score _SCORE_

RE: e-mail size limits

From: Robert Swan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have recently taken over administration of a Spamassassin server that is running RedHat 9, and Spamassassin 3.04, spamd, spamc, postfix. When users from the outside try and send us e-mail larger than 10MB they

RE: e-mail size limits

-- quote -- Assuming that the mailbox is not full (especially because it is on another server), how would the linux/spamassassin box be limiting the mail size? And where would I find this setting, woould it be postfix, sendmail or spamassassin that is doing it? Thanks in advance for you

e-mail size limits

I have recently taken over administration of a Spamassassin server that is running RedHat 9, and Spamassassin 3.04, spamd, spamc, postfix. When users from the outside try and send us e-mail larger than 10MB they get a bounce back:       Administrator@thierdomain.com on 6/30/2005 11:43 AM

Re: NOTICE: 3.1.0 rescoring mass-checks

Theo Van Dinter wrote: >On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:48:02PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > > >>http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreDetails has all the >>details. >> >> > >You'll want to set something like: > >bayes_path /home/corpus/SA/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0/masses/spamassassin/bayes >

Re: NOTICE: 3.1.0 rescoring mass-checks

On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:48:02PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreDetails has all the > details. You'll want to set something like: bayes_path /home/corpus/SA/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0/masses/spamassassin/bayes As well, so you don't overwrite (potentially)

Re: unsibscribe

As the headers say: list-unsubscribe: Evan At 07:30 AM 6/30/2005, you wrote:

A training issue of good vs bad

I have verified that the installation I am taking over has Spamssassin 2.63. It was trained (I presume) on good & bad emails about 1-2 yrs ago. SPAM has been "automatically" collected from users and fed back into the system. However, there has been no updating on the "good" email training. Ov

List with all spam tests for database import

Hi all, I'm new on this list since a few minutes. I've written a small web interface to easy manage the possible anti spam settings within a mysql database. To not typing or converting many hundreds of spam test lines like its shown on the website, I want to get the original list. I think t

70_sc_top200.cf not updated

The 70_sc_top200.cf on rulesemporium has not been updated since May 27. This is supposed to be automatically generated. I could not find a contact on the rulesemporium page - anyone know why this rule is no longer updated? { Shelley Waltz; Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine; Rutge

unsibscribe

Re: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available!

On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 06:39 -0500, Michael Parker wrote: > Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > > > >>SQL > >> storage is now recommended for Bayes > >> > >> > > > >Hm, time to check the documents how to set this up ... > >BTW: is my impression correct that Bayes on SQL won't do any auto-expire, > >you h

Re: how do train SpamAssassin

liyas_m m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/30/2005 12:02:15 AM: > :0fw > | /usr/bin/spamc > No i dont see any X_Spam_headers > > Please respond to the list so others can assist. I don't use procmail, so I can't help you there. I assume you have spamd running?  Run  spamassassin --lint  does it

Re: Spamassassin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jun 30, 2005, at 9:20 AM, Michael wrote: I have the option use_auto_whitelist 1 in my local.cf and autolearn still doesn't work. Anyone know what should i do ?? That option enables the autom

Re: Is rules_du_jour working?

Hello Dr, Wednesday, June 29, 2005, 9:15:41 PM, you wrote: DRY> The config file is DRY> TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU0 SARE_HTML SARE_HTML0 DRY> SARE_HTML1 SARE_HTML2 SARE_HTML3 SARE_HTML4 SARE_HTML_ENG DRY> SARE_HTML_PRE300 SARE_FRAUD SARE_BML SARE_SPOOF"; DRY> SA_DIR="/home/

Re: Spamassassin

Michael wrote: I have the option use_auto_whitelist 1 in my local.cf and autolearn still doesnt work. Anyone know what should i do ?? You really need to read up on some of the docs...use_auto_whitelist has NOTHING to do with autolearn. -Jim

Re: testing

On Thursday, June 30, 2005, at 06:29AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hey all, I'm not seeing some of my messages come through to the list. >Could someone tell me if they get this? > >-Dan > >-- > >Dan Mahoney >Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek >Gushi on efnet

Spamassassin

I have the option use_auto_whitelist 1 in my local.cf and autolearn still doesnt work. Anyone know what should i do ??  

Re: help with spamd

At 09:11 AM 6/30/2005, Jim Maul wrote: Michael wrote: How can i get the autolearn to work ?? I heard that you have to stand on one foot while patting your head and rubbing your stomach. -Jim Don't forget the sacrificial chickens... Mark

Re: help with spamd

Michael wrote: How can i get the autolearn to work ?? I heard that you have to stand on one foot while patting your head and rubbing your stomach. -Jim

Re: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available! (migrating Bayes from DB_File)

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Thursday, June 30, 2005 12:31 AM -0500 Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sure, here is a basic procedure: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesMigration Great, that looks very helpful. The page starts with "There are now multiple

Re: help with spamd

How can i get the autolearn to work ??

Re: testing

Ed Kasky wrote: Ping... On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: Hey all, I'm not seeing some of my messages come through to the list. Could someone tell me if they get this? -Dan -- Dan Mahoney Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735

Re: RCVD_IN_RSP_TRUSTED indeed....

HABEAS_INFRINGERS seems like it would be a good thing to leave in. It is the list of known infringers on the HABEAS mark. The BSP_OTHER might be similar. But the trusted ones probably best gone indeed. {^_-} - Original Message - From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ah > > I

Re: testing

Ping... On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: Hey all, I'm not seeing some of my messages come through to the list. Could someone tell me if they get this? -Dan -- Dan Mahoney Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM

Re: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available!

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > >>SQL >> storage is now recommended for Bayes >> >> > >Hm, time to check the documents how to set this up ... >BTW: is my impression correct that Bayes on SQL won't do any auto-expire, >you have to do it yourself with some SQL code? > > No, it does auto expire just f

Re: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available!

Justin Mason wrote on Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:45:11 -0700: so far no problems! > SQL > storage is now recommended for Bayes Hm, time to check the documents how to set this up ... BTW: is my impression correct that Bayes on SQL won't do any auto-expire, you have to do it yourself with some SQL cod

Re: RCVD_IN_RSP_TRUSTED indeed....

Ah I don't use these services at all. I find they are more trouble than they are worth. Set the score to zero in local.cf and the test won't run. score HABEAS_INFRINGER 0.0 score HABEAS_USER 0.0 score RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED 0.0 score RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER 0.0 -- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administ

Re: RCVD_IN_RSP_TRUSTED indeed....

Actually this is not the case. This is the rule that hit: ===8<--- /usr/share//spamassassin/20_dnsbl_tests.cf:header RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED eval:check_rbl_txt('bsp-firsttrusted', 'sa-trusted.bondedsender.org.') ===8<--- It appears sa-trusted.bondedsender.org has a bond to collect. {^_^} - Origi

Re: RCVD_IN_RSP_TRUSTED indeed....

Hi well known issue with the bits of SA you have to configure yourself. See internal_networks and trusted_networks settings in the conf file (ie RTFM on these two and set them appropriately). -- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administrator Solid State Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 jdow wrote:

RCVD_IN_RSP_TRUSTED indeed....

Methinks this list of trusted locations needs some fixup. The first part of the very long message follows: {^_^} ===8<--- Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by morticia.wizardess.wiz (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5UA3RX0013662 for <[EM

Re: Help with Stock and Drug Spam

Brian Wong wrote on Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:11:49 -0400: > Does anyone have any tips for me? have a look at www.rulesemporium.com Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org

Re: A Central 'Rules' site?

Well yes you can just use wget if you want, but RDJ will test the updates for syntax errors and roll back if there are problems... -- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administrator Solid State Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 Evan Platt wrote: At 02:04 AM 6/29/2005, you wrote: RulesDuJour. Loren do

Re: error: Insecure dependency in eval while running setuid at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 2119._ , continuing

Ah well - latest news is that perl 5.8.6 partially mitigated the problem. However, as a test I turned off fetchmail for a couple hours then let 'er rip. That placed a big enough load on the system that I started seeing the PerMsgStatus error at line 2119 again. {^_^} - Original Message -