HABEAS_INFRINGERS seems like it would be a good thing to leave in.
It is the list of known infringers on the HABEAS mark. The BSP_OTHER
might be similar. But the trusted ones.... probably best gone indeed.

{^_-}
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> Ah
>
> I don't use these services at all. I find they are more trouble than
> they are worth. Set the score to zero in local.cf and the test won't run.
>
> score HABEAS_INFRINGER 0.0
> score HABEAS_USER 0.0
> score RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED 0.0
> score RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER 0.0
>
>
> --
> Martin Hepworth
> Snr Systems Administrator
> Solid State Logic
> Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
>
>
> jdow wrote:
> > Actually this is not the case. This is the rule that hit:
> > ===8<---
> > /usr/share//spamassassin/20_dnsbl_tests.cf:header RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED
> > eval:check_rbl_txt('bsp-firsttrusted', 'sa-trusted.bondedsender.org.')
> > ===8<---
> >
> > It appears sa-trusted.bondedsender.org has a bond to collect.
> > {^_^}
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >>Hi
> >>
> >>well known issue with the bits of SA you have to configure yourself. See
> >>internal_networks and trusted_networks settings in the conf file (ie
> >>RTFM on these two and set them appropriately).
> >>
> >>--
> >>Martin Hepworth
> >>Snr Systems Administrator
> >>Solid State Logic
> >>Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> >>
> >>
> >>jdow wrote:
> >>
> >>>Methinks this list of trusted locations needs some fixup. The first
part
> >>>of the very long message follows:
> >>>
> >>>{^_^}
> >>>
> >>>===8<---
> >>>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
> >>> by morticia.wizardess.wiz (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5UA3RX0013662
> >>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 03:03:28 -0700
> >>>Status: OU
> >>>Received: from smtp.earthlink.net [209.86.93.210]
> >>> by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5)
> >>> for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Thu, 30 Jun 2005
> >>>03:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
> >>>Received: from mia29.ediets.com ([66.128.72.29])
> >>> by mx-roseate.atl.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with ESMTP
> >
> > id
> >
> >>>1dNVSD55M3Nl34f0
> >>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:02:47 -0400 (EDT)
> >>>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:07:22 -0400 (EDT)
> >>>From: eDiets Extra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Reply-To: "eDiets.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Subject: The GI Diet: Sample 2-Day Menu
> >>>Mime-Version: 1.0
> >>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> >>> boundary="----=_Part_104623_15728949.1120126042073"
> >>>X-edts: xizziwkssbmbzbmezisrswr cmzasrbrebmkrer iccwieswk
> >>>X-ELNK-AV: 0
> >>>X-NKVIR: Scanned
> >>>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on
> >>> morticia.wizardess.wiz
> >>>X-Spam-Level: **
> >>>X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0
> >>>tests=BAYES_99,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL,
> >>> HTML_80_90,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_MOSTLY,
> >>> MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MPART_ALT_DIFF,RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED,
> >>> TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=3.0.4
> >>>X-Jdow: user procmail
> >>>X-IMAPbase: 1119863107 3375
> >>>X-UID: 3373
> >>>Content-Length: 62157
> >>>X-Keywords:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>**********************************************************************
> >>
> >>This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> >>intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> >>are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> >>the system manager.
> >>
> >>This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
> >>for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.
> >>
> >>**********************************************************************
> >
> >
> >
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
>
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
> for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.
>
> **********************************************************************


Reply via email to