HABEAS_INFRINGERS seems like it would be a good thing to leave in. It is the list of known infringers on the HABEAS mark. The BSP_OTHER might be similar. But the trusted ones.... probably best gone indeed.
{^_-} ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ah > > I don't use these services at all. I find they are more trouble than > they are worth. Set the score to zero in local.cf and the test won't run. > > score HABEAS_INFRINGER 0.0 > score HABEAS_USER 0.0 > score RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED 0.0 > score RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER 0.0 > > > -- > Martin Hepworth > Snr Systems Administrator > Solid State Logic > Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 > > > jdow wrote: > > Actually this is not the case. This is the rule that hit: > > ===8<--- > > /usr/share//spamassassin/20_dnsbl_tests.cf:header RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED > > eval:check_rbl_txt('bsp-firsttrusted', 'sa-trusted.bondedsender.org.') > > ===8<--- > > > > It appears sa-trusted.bondedsender.org has a bond to collect. > > {^_^} > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >>Hi > >> > >>well known issue with the bits of SA you have to configure yourself. See > >>internal_networks and trusted_networks settings in the conf file (ie > >>RTFM on these two and set them appropriately). > >> > >>-- > >>Martin Hepworth > >>Snr Systems Administrator > >>Solid State Logic > >>Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 > >> > >> > >>jdow wrote: > >> > >>>Methinks this list of trusted locations needs some fixup. The first part > >>>of the very long message follows: > >>> > >>>{^_^} > >>> > >>>===8<--- > >>>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) > >>> by morticia.wizardess.wiz (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5UA3RX0013662 > >>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 03:03:28 -0700 > >>>Status: OU > >>>Received: from smtp.earthlink.net [209.86.93.210] > >>> by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5) > >>> for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Thu, 30 Jun 2005 > >>>03:03:28 -0700 (PDT) > >>>Received: from mia29.ediets.com ([66.128.72.29]) > >>> by mx-roseate.atl.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with ESMTP > > > > id > > > >>>1dNVSD55M3Nl34f0 > >>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:02:47 -0400 (EDT) > >>>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:07:22 -0400 (EDT) > >>>From: eDiets Extra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>Reply-To: "eDiets.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>Subject: The GI Diet: Sample 2-Day Menu > >>>Mime-Version: 1.0 > >>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > >>> boundary="----=_Part_104623_15728949.1120126042073" > >>>X-edts: xizziwkssbmbzbmezisrswr cmzasrbrebmkrer iccwieswk > >>>X-ELNK-AV: 0 > >>>X-NKVIR: Scanned > >>>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on > >>> morticia.wizardess.wiz > >>>X-Spam-Level: ** > >>>X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 > >>>tests=BAYES_99,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, > >>> HTML_80_90,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_MOSTLY, > >>> MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MPART_ALT_DIFF,RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED, > >>> TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=3.0.4 > >>>X-Jdow: user procmail > >>>X-IMAPbase: 1119863107 3375 > >>>X-UID: 3373 > >>>Content-Length: 62157 > >>>X-Keywords: > >>> > >>> > >> > >>********************************************************************** > >> > >>This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > >>intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > >>are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > >>the system manager. > >> > >>This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept > >>for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean. > >> > >>********************************************************************** > > > > > > > > ********************************************************************** > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the system manager. > > This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept > for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean. > > **********************************************************************