Has anyone set up a database/clearing house of "rules" etc that are
associated with Spamassassin? Something like Perl's CPAN?
On 6/28/05, Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The kill level is set to 12, this spam had 21.301 points, and made it
> through.
>
> Hrm. No matter what I set the kill level to (using the squirrelmail
> amavissql plugin) it doesn't kill it.
>
> I'm not exactly sure what to check..
> Jun
> here is how I do it
> then I don't have to count stars :)
>
> :0 H:
> * ^X-Spam-Status: +(yes|no), +score=\/[^. ]*
> * ? (( ${MATCH} > 14 ))
> /dev/null
Just curious - won't that /dev/null a ham message that scores higher than 14
also?
You seem to be matching against spam-status = no there, if
Usually it is the headers that catch these as obvious fakes. However, there
are some SARE rules to look for some of the more obvious text tricks also.
Since you didn't include the headers for that message it is a little hard to
see what might have hit.
That said, between SARE rules and some local
(Top posting to preserve content and present a short additional comment.)
This appears to be fixable with an upgrade of perl. I had been running
perl5 5.8.5 for Mandrake 10.1. I am now running 5.8.6 per Fedora Core 4
and am not seeing this problem. It may be a perl problem rather than a
SpamAssass
Chris Santerre wrote:
I have definetly seen an increase in worms.
Yea..same.
I can't be relied upon for accurate spam stats. I've been listwashed back to
the stone age. Yes, I'm actually complaining I don't get enough spam :) And
no, I don't want people to send me theirs :)
Me too! We ha
Chris Thielen wrote:
Pál László (Sq.) wrote:
I also would like to remove spams over a certain level, so I'v created
the following .procmailrc entry
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
It seems not working. What is the problem?
Looks fine to me. Is that recipe in your proc
In an older episode (Tuesday 28 June 2005 22:40), Jack Gostl wrote:
> Some how my domain has gotten itself blacklisted. Can anyone suggest how I
> can find out where the blacklisting occurred and how to get it undone?
With many RBLs, the error message of the remote mail server should show you an
On 6/28/2005 10:40 PM +0200, Jack Gostl wrote:
Some how my domain has gotten itself blacklisted. Can anyone suggest how
I can find out where the blacklisting occurred and how to get it undone?
Thanks - Jack
I suppose you mean your ip(range) got listed.
enter your ip in the Spam datbase lookup
Some how my domain has gotten itself blacklisted. Can anyone suggest how I
can find out where the blacklisting occurred and how to get it undone?
Thanks - Jack
On 6/28/2005 9:49 PM +0200, Debbie D wrote:
What rules can I add or tweak to stop these??
Over here, they always almost hit bayes_99, dcc and razor.
In about 50% of the cases, they hit some SARE (FRAUD i suppose) rule.
The SARE rules don't come in stock SA (http://www.rulesemporium.com)
Niek B
Pál László (Sq.) wrote:
It looks this entry has been skipped somehow. Other rule moving spam
police messages to /dev/nul works fine.
I'm not seeing where SA is called. It appears that SA is being invoked
from outside procmail.
Can you give more info about your system's processing chain?
Have a look at MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info).
It has builtin phishing checks
What rules can I add or tweak to stop these??
Your credit/debit card information must be updated
Dear eBay Member,
We recently noticed one or more attempts to log in to your eBay account from
a foreign IP address and we have reasons to believe that your account was
used by a third party without
In my corner of the world, mails are usually written with 8859 (or perhaps
utf8) character sets
and a low percentage of non ascii codes. Real MUAs seem to prefer qp encoding
for themessage text as well as any headers requiring non ascii (display names
in From and To, as well as Subject)
With qp t
Pál László (Sq.) wrote:
I also would like to remove spams over a certain level, so I'v created
the following .procmailrc entry
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
It seems not working. What is the problem?
Looks fine to me. Is that recipe in your procmailrc AFTER spamassas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Anyone knows a way to tell spamassassin to handle some special
> characters (HU, iso and utf) as normal characters in message subject?
> Currently spa. gives 2.9 points for single ó á or é. I would like to
> override this setting but only for a spec
At 11:52 AM 6/28/2005, you wrote:
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
I believe that it should be
* ^X-Spam-Level:.\*
Hi,
Anyone knows a way to tell spamassassin to handle some special
characters (HU, iso and utf) as normal characters in message subject?
Currently spa. gives 2.9 points for single ó á or é. I would like to
override this setting but only for a specific language.
I have the following settings in ef
Evgeni Vachkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Spamassassin with Sendmail and procmail;
> The /etc/procmailrc is:
>
>
> DROPPRIVS=yes
>
> :0fw
> * < 256000
> | /usr/bin/spamc -f
>
> :0
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> $HOME/spam
> --
Paul R. Ganci wrote:
> This is somewhat a philosophical question, but I will ask it anyways.
> Recent discussions have occurred on this list regarding what
> Spamassassin should do with Spam. The recent consensus seems to be that
> it is only Spamassassin's job to tag Spam and that some other progr
>-Original Message-
>From: Bruno Delbono [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 11:45 AM
>To: Chris Santerre; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Very few URIBL hits today. :(
>
>
>Chris Santerre wrote:
>> So for now, we require everyone to add the multi.uribl.com
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailgate.pbp.net
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=17.323 tagged_above=-999 required=6
tests=[FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05, HTML_90_100=0.189, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID=1.704, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=1.485, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.15,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.137, URIBL_AB_SURBL
Chris Santerre wrote:
So for now, we require everyone to add the multi.uribl.com into their config
manually. We have our reasons :)
Has anyone seen an increase in Chinese spam lately? We cannot (due to
some users) filter out Asian languages but interestingly, in the past 2
days, I've seen an
Paul R. Ganci wrote on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:34:22 -0600:
> However, I don't
> necessarily agree with the above because while I can add a procmail rule
> to handle a specific user's blacklist I can't get back the wasted CPU
> cycles which spamassassin expended
But that's up to *your* setup. If y
Lars E. D. Jensen wrote:
Hi list
I'm using spamassassin 3.0.3 and when I attach a file with a test spam mail,
it get's through?
Is this intentional?
I'm using simscan with clamav for virus scanning at smtp level and following
configure line with qmailadmin:
--enable-spam-command='|preline /
Hi list
I'm using spamassassin 3.0.3 and when I attach a file with a test spam mail,
it get's through?
Is this intentional?
I'm using simscan with clamav for virus scanning at smtp level and following
configure line with qmailadmin:
--enable-spam-command='|preline /usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/bin/mai
>URIBL tests are still hitting good here.
>
>TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
>FROM 2005-06-27 03:47:11 TO 2005-06-27 21:28:42
>---
>-
>--
>RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES
>%OFMAIL %OFSPAM
>---
> Why is it not a good idea for Spamassassin to immediately
>send to /dev/null a message flagged in somebody's blacklist ASAP ...
>i.e. no further processing? Is the only way to handle this via a
>procmail recipe? Similar what about a whitelist ... shouldn't
>it be sent
>on as Ham ASAP ... i.e
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:38:10PM +0800, liyas_m m wrote:
> Hi,
> I have installed the lastest version of SpamAssassin.
> But it doest seem to stop the spam email that coming in to my
> server..please help
> How do i check whether my configuration is correct.
>
Question, are you using a 3rd party
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 11:38, liyas_m m typed:
> Hi,
> I have installed the lastest version of SpamAssassin.
> But it doest seem to stop the spam email that coming in to my
> server..please help
> How do i check whether my configuration is correct.
You may have misconceptions about how SpamAssass
Hi
How have you configured SA? What is calling it: procmail, amavis,
MailScanner...???
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
liyas_m m wrote:
Hi,
I have installed the lastest version of SpamAssassin.
But it doest seem to stop the spam email t
Hi,
I have installed the lastest version of SpamAssassin.
But it doest seem to stop the spam email that coming in to my
server..please help
How do i check whether my configuration is correct.
Thanks you
Alias
Hi,
I am using Spamassassin with Sendmail and procmail;
The /etc/procmailrc is:
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw* < 256000| /usr/bin/spamc
-f
:0* ^X-Spam-Status:
Yes$HOME/spam
Mail delivery to system local m
34 matches
Mail list logo
