Alan Premselaar wrote:
perhaps all I am really asking is if there is a way to allow
spamassassin to just stop processing a message that is in a blacklist
to save the cycles? I am not asking for spamassassin to become an
MTA/MDA.
In that case it would be ultimately more efficient to add a rej
Take a look at http://www.uribl.com/, use the "Usage" link on the left
:o)
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Nichols [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 7:46 AM
To: Dallas L. Engelken
Cc: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: Very few URIBL hits today. :(
> Just curious.. Are yo
Paul R. Ganci wrote:
Alan Premselaar wrote:
Philosophically, it makes more sense for SpamAssassin to focus on
identifying SPAM, and let another application (MTA, procmail, etc)
focus on what it was primarily designed for: processing
(delivery,rejection,etc) of said email. It's certainly no m
Alan Premselaar wrote:
Philosophically, it makes more sense for SpamAssassin to focus on
identifying SPAM, and let another application (MTA, procmail, etc)
focus on what it was primarily designed for: processing
(delivery,rejection,etc) of said email. It's certainly no more of a
hassle to ad
Just curious.. Are you using multi.uribl.com?
d
hrm. You know, I'm not. heh. Where's the info on how to do so? I'm not
sure if I got subscribed to the mailing list or not..
Paul R. Ganci wrote:
This is somewhat a philosophical question, but I will ask it anyways.
Recent discussions have occurred on this list regarding what
Spamassassin should do with Spam. The recent consensus seems to be that
it is only Spamassassin's job to tag Spam and that some other program
>
> > URIBL tests are still hitting good here.
> >
> > TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
> > FROM 2005-06-27 03:47:11 TO 2005-06-27 21:28:42
>
> Hrm. Interesting. I turned the debug level up a bit and saw this:
>
> Jun 27 20:59:18 mailgate amavis[11145]: (11145-01) SPAM-TAG,
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->
> <[E
URIBL tests are still hitting good here.
TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
FROM 2005-06-27 03:47:11 TO 2005-06-27 21:28:42
Hrm. Interesting. I turned the debug level up a bit and saw this:
Jun 27 20:59:18 mailgate amavis[11145]: (11145-01) SPAM-TAG,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PR
The kill level is set to 12, this spam had 21.301 points, and made it
through.
Hrm. No matter what I set the kill level to (using the squirrelmail
amavissql plugin) it doesn't kill it.
I'm not exactly sure what to check..
Jun 27 20:35:11 mailgate amavis[14254]: (14254-02) Passed SPAM,
<[EMAI
This is somewhat a philosophical question, but I will ask it anyways.
Recent discussions have occurred on this list regarding what
Spamassassin should do with Spam. The recent consensus seems to be that
it is only Spamassassin's job to tag Spam and that some other program
should decide what to
>
> Man, I've been getting a *lot* of spam hitting the Inbox
> today. Only been able to find 1 spam today with any URIBL
> hits at all, but almost all of the have had RAZOR2_CHECK points added.
>
URIBL tests are still hitting good here.
TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
FROM 2005-06-27 03:47:11 TO 2005-06
Not using any URI tests?
% nslookup -type=any gravesides.com.multi.surbl.org b.surbl.org
Server: b.surbl.org
Address:207.166.203.146#53
Name: gravesides.com.multi.surbl.org
Address: 127.0.0.118
gravesides.com.multi.surbl.org text = "Blocked, gravesides.com on lists
[sc
Man, I've been getting a *lot* of spam hitting the Inbox today. Only
been able to find 1 spam today with any URIBL hits at all, but almost
all of the have had RAZOR2_CHECK points added.
ALso noticing a LOT of spam with Squirrelmail headers.. ie:
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a
X-Mailer: Squirre
John Rudd wrote:
>
> Forgive me if the newer versions of SA have this built in (I know
> there's something about defining your local IP addresses), but I had a
> user ask me today if I could set up our system to flag messages which
> have only been circulated around our campus.
If your trusted_ne
Forgive me if the newer versions of SA have this built in (I know
there's something about defining your local IP addresses), but I had a
user ask me today if I could set up our system to flag messages which
have only been circulated around our campus.
It seems easy enough for to me hand-craf
Helio Nunes wrote:
> Thanks
> I still have another point. Our mailboxes are still receiving mail with
> those
> forbiden drugs as per 20_drugs.cf, lets say c..i..a..l..i..s goes through.
> Thanks again
> Helio
>
Well, based on your description alone it should arrive.
Just hitting one rule alo
Thanks
I still have another point. Our mailboxes are still receiving mail with those
forbiden drugs as per 20_drugs.cf, lets say c..i..a..l..i..s goes through.
Thanks again
Helio
On Monday 27 June 2005 18:17, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Helio Nunes wrote:
> > I have qmail toaster (Bill Supp's last
yeah it exists.
sorry for the post.
i just thought i'd get more eyes to look at the error because the amavis list
can't figure it out.
thanks
-Original Message-
From: MC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 6/27/2005 6:18 PM
To:
Cc: Users (E-mail
Kern, Tom wrote:
I'm running Amavis-new-2.3.1 with Postfix(not chrooted) on redhat ES 3
When I try to reload or stop amavis, I get- No PID file
/var/amavis/amavisd.pid, can't reload the process
Amavisd debug produces this-
Jun 27 13:49:18 mta1.charmer.com /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[7870]: startin
Helio Nunes wrote:
> I have qmail toaster (Bill Supp's last version)with clamav and simscan and OS
> is Suse 9.2.
> Default locations are: /etc/mail/spamassassin for .spamassassion, init.pre,
> local.cf
> /usr/share/spamassassin for the additional (or I think are additional.. )
>
> How can I s
I have qmail toaster (Bill Supp's last version)with clamav and simscan and OS
is Suse 9.2.
Default locations are: /etc/mail/spamassassin for .spamassassion, init.pre,
local.cf
/usr/share/spamassassin for the additional (or I think are additional.. )
How can I say spamassassin is really using s
% spamassassin --lint \
--lint \
--siteconfigpath=/var/Data/SpamAssassin \
--configpath=/var/Settings/SpamAssassin \
--config-file=local.cf \
--nocreate-prefs
dumb me ...
--- --config-file=local.cf \
+++ --prefs-file=local.cf \
sorry,
richard
I am using Sendmail 8.13.1.
Joao.
-Mensagem original-
De: Craig Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 27 de junho de 2005 16:20
Para: Joao Gazzoni
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Assunto: {Spam?} Re: Block messages with "null" sender
Joao Gazzoni wrote:
> Hello
Dr. Aharon Friedman wrote:
> Additional data:
>
>
>
> I looked in the maillog after running spamc and found the following line:
>
>
>
> Jun 27 15:34:18 mail2 spamd[49795]: unauthorized connection from
> mail2.friedman.net [10.40.45.30] at port 64636
>
>
>
> How do I resolve this?
That
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/spamd.html
look
at documentation for --allowed-ips
By
default only localhost is allowed to connect
You
probably want at least to add
--allowed-ips=10.40.45.30
and
possibly even as much as
--allowed-ips=10.*.*.*
to
your spamd flags
Additional data:
I looked in the maillog after running spamc
and found the following line:
Jun 27 15:34:18 mail2 spamd[49795]: unauthorized connection from
mail2.friedman.net [10.40.45.30] at port 64636
How do I resolve this?
Aharon
-Original Message-
From: Dr. A
Joao Gazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know how to block messages that come with a blank
> sender address in the "from" field, like "from=<>" ?
>
> We are using SA with MailScanner.
>
> Thanks for any suggestion.
>
I'd suggest reading some of the RFC's referenced at:
http://www.rfc-igno
hi all,
i've built SA (SpamAssassin (2005-06-22) 3.1.0-pre2-r192980) on OSX 10.4.1
with:
...
PREFIX=/usr/local/spamassassin \
DATADIR=/var/Data/SpamAssassin \
CONFDIR=/var/Settings/SpamAssassin
...
so that:
the binaries ...
% ls /usr/local/spamassassin/bin
Yeah, the reason not to block such is that DSN (Delivery Status
Notifications) are supposed to come in this way. If you block such,
your users will not be happy ... .
jay
Craig Jackson wrote:
Joao Gazzoni wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know how to block messages that come with a blank
sender
Joao Gazzoni wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know how to block messages that come with a blank
sender address in the "from" field, like "from=<>" ?
We are using SA with MailScanner.
Thanks for any suggestion.
That's funny. There was just recently a big flame war on the Exim list
about this topic.
I'm running Amavis-new-2.3.1 with Postfix(not chrooted) on redhat ES 3
When I try to reload or stop amavis, I get- No PID file
/var/amavis/amavisd.pid, can't reload the process
Amavisd debug produces this-
Jun 27 13:49:18 mta1.charmer.com /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[7870]: starting.
/usr/local/sbi
Hello,
Does anyone know how to block messages that come with a blank
sender address in the "from" field, like "from=<>" ?
We are using SA with MailScanner.
Thanks for any suggestion.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 08:48:25AM -0400, Ben Hanson wrote:
> QUOTE___
> /etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
> Shutting down spamd: [ OK ]
> Starting spamd: Could not create INET socket on 127.0.0.1:783: Address
> already in use (IO::Socket::INET
Dr. Aharon Friedman wrote:
Command: spamd –c –d –r /var/run/spamd/spamd.pid
Version: 3.0.4
Platform: FreeBSD 5.4
When I run the command:
Cat spam.msg | spamassassin | grep –I spam
I get:
with SpamAssassin (version 3.0.4);
Subject: *SPAM*
=?utf-8?B?T2ZmaWNlI
Jeff wrote:
I have setup spamassassin to delete messages if they are spam and it
seems to work. However, I am still getting some that are being marked.
How do I get them all to be deleted?
What mechanism are you using to do this - is it tied in within your
MTA or are you doing via Procmail
Hallo und guten Tag Jeff,
Heute (am 27.06.2005 - 16:41 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
> I have setup spamassassin to delete messages if they are
> spam and it seems to work. However, I am still getting some
> that are being marked. How do I get them all to be deleted?
SA cannot self delete SPAM. This
On Monday 27 June 2005 15:41, Jeff typed:
> I have setup spamassassin to delete messages if they are spam and it seems
> to work. However, I am still getting some that are being marked. How do I
> get them all to be deleted?
SA doesn't delete mails, so you'd have to check the application that do
I have setup spamassassin to delete messages if
they are spam and it seems to work. However, I am still getting some that
are being marked. How do I get them all to be
deleted?
QUOTE___
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
Shutting down spamd: [ OK ]
Starting spamd: Could not create INET socket on 127.0.0.1:783: Address
already in use (IO::Socket::INET: Address already in use) [FAILED]
__
I got ex
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 15:53 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> I'm completely guessing out of the blue here, but is it a timing issue? Is
> it trying to restart before the final child is able to quit?
>
Yes, sort of...
Chris Thielen wrote:
>
> Maybe try changing your SA_RESTART to "killall -HUP spa
Hello.
I use SA 3.0.3 on my FreeBSD box with qmail and simscan.
I run SA like this:
--
# /usr/local/bin/spamd -d -D -u nobody
--
I see the next problem with bayes:
--
>> Jun 27 10:01:07 XX spamd[42070]: debug: auto-learning failed: lock:
>> 42070 cannot create tmp lockfile
>> /var/spool/s
41 matches
Mail list logo
