Thanks, Matt!
Yes, your right. I have it exacliy you discribe. With SQL
My only problem was to get the right message. But it's solved. All running
up.
Ingo
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ingo Reinhart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 17
When linting my rules with debug, I get the following in the output:
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x8c0d3a4)
implements 'parse_config'
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Hashcash=HASH(0x8bf0e74)
implements 'parse_config' Argument "" isn't numeric in addition (+)
CentOS 3.4
# rpm -qa spamassassin
spamassassin-3.0.3-1.1.el3.rf
# rpm -qa mailscanner
mailscanner-4.41.3-1
I start with starter db from Fortress Systems since my old bayes db from
2.6x was creamed by this same issue...
# spamassassin -p /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf -D --lint
much sn
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 05:50:32PM -0700, John Schneider wrote:
> Argument "" isn't numeric in addition (+) at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm line 743.
>
> I've searched .. What could it be?
Bad config line. Looking at the code, a bad "report_safe" line.
--
Ra
Hello John,
Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 2:02:16 PM, you wrote:
J> Hi,
J> I have been searching around with no luck. I have been playing with
J> mass-checks on my corpus using some the SARE rules sets and wanted to do a
J> sanity check against someone else's mass checks. The particular rules sets
J> ar
I was curious if anyone had used Spamassassin caller for Imail?
One of my clients is currently running Imail 8.05 on a windows 2000
machine. I installed Perl 5.8.4 (downloaded recommended modules), SA
3.0.1, and SAC 1.1.0.
Spamassassin < sample-spam.txt return everything that it should,
spamassa
--On Tuesday, May 17, 2005 11:59 AM +0200 Menno van Bennekom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It has been said before but I still would appreciate it very much if ISP's
would only allow SMTP traffic to go through the provider's mail-servers,
not directly from dsl/cable to the Internet.
It would stop mo
When linting my rules with debug, I get the following in the output:
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x8c0d3a4)
implements 'parse_config'
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Hashcash=HASH(0x8bf0e74)
implements 'parse_config'
Argument "" isn't numeric in addition (+)
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:09:39AM +, Fredrik Bjork wrote:
> Surely there is a better way, but nobody seems to be willing to post it...
tools/check_whitelist? Been part of the standard distro for ages. Output is:
0.0 (0.0/2) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=66.92
Average Score (tot
Fredrik Bjork wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have seen a couple of requests for reading the auto-whitelist file in plain
> text. You can use at least two database formats, but this command worked for
> me:
>
> dbmmanage auto-whitelist view
> Surely there is a better way, but nobody seems to be willing
Ronan McGlue wrote:
> trying to train bayes with german spam
> so i take a mail out of my imap folder and put it into a sile on the
> spamD server..
>
> I Vee-eye it and take out the spamassassin headers ( is this the right
> move?) then run the following
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ronan# sa-
Johnson, Robert F wrote:
> I'm trying to debug why a specific domain is not triggering
> USER_IN_WHITELIST even though the domain is listed in sa-mimedefang as
>
> whitelist_from*@.
>
> White listing is working in general. What conditions does
> USER_IN_WHITELIST look for? For example,
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:49:21AM +, Ronan McGlue wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ronan# sa-learn --spam -D spam1
Try "sa-learn --spam -D < spam1"
> debug: refresh: 14319 refresh /home/spam/.spamassassin/bayes.mutex
> debug: refresh: 14319 refresh /home/spam/.spamassassin/bayes.mutex
> debu
> Does anyone know the logic behind this spam bombing? I have a friend
> who has a gmx.de account and he has gotten 0 german spam in it... yet
> here in the u.s. we are getting bombarded by the spam.
>
There is logic behind spamming ? News to me ;-)
Personally I think it's incredibly arrogant of
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Matt wrote:
> Does anyone know the logic behind this spam bombing? I have a friend
> who has a gmx.de account and he has gotten 0 german spam in it... yet
> here in the u.s. we are getting bombarded by the spam.
Yes, it's an intelligence/clue level logic. Last week some hack
OK, I uninstalled SA 3.0.0 and did a clean install of 3.0.3, downloaded new
SARE rules and tried again. I am still not getting any URI results. Can any one
explain what happens in the
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x2982e68) implements
'check_post_dnsbl'
section bel
> Did this suddendly stop today for anyone else and now your just dealing
> with the NDR's?
Actually it suddenly *started* for me today. Before that only one stupid
zombie somplace thought I was in Germany. Now they all seem to.
And the faked sender names all start with the letter "J".
OK, I uninstalled SA 3.0.0 and did a clean install of 3.0.3, downloaded new
SARE rules and tried again. I am still not getting any URI results. Can any one
explain what happens in the
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x2982e68) implements
'check_post_dnsbl'
section bel
Ingo Reinhart wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I want to use sa-learn on a diffrent server than spamd is running. How
> can I tell sa-learn to connect to the right spamd?
>
> Ingo
>
>
sa-learn doesn't connect to spamd. Period. The only thing that ever connects to
spamd in the SA package is spamc.
If you'r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ingo Reinhart wrote:
> I want to use sa-learn on a diffrent server than spamd is running. How
> can I tell sa-learn to connect to the right spamd?
sa-learn doesn't connect to spamd, it manipulates the database directly,
either file based DBM or SQL ba
Hi,
I have been searching around with no luck. I have been playing with
mass-checks on my corpus using some the SARE rules sets and wanted to do a
sanity check against someone else's mass checks. The particular rules sets
are
70_sare_adult.cf
70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf
70_sare_evilnum0.cf
70_sare_
news <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/16/2005
02:07:55 PM:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having problems with SpamAssassin-3.0.3 on a Fedora Core 2 machine
> along with Sendmail. SpamAssassin is able to identify mail as spam,
and
> adds its headers to the mail. However, it does not rewrite the subject
> head
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Loren Wilton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> Since I have legitimate users communicating all over the world, I am
>> very interested in other rulesets that would block spam in languages
>> besides English. Not sure how big of a problem this is - I know we get
>
>I beli
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 03:53:38AM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> Apparently the backslash at the end of the URI throws off some
> parsers such as (unpatched) 3.0.1. Hopefully the same patch that
> catches just : at the end of URIs, etc. also catches these.
Not really. 3.0 doesn't deal with it, 3.1 w
> config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: rewrite_subject 0
Deprecated. Just remove the line since you don't want to rewrite
anything.
> config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping:
> always_add_headers 1
Deprecated. Now you should manually define which headers to add, and i
jimsheffer wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I've just set up a new mail server running the latest version of
> spamassassin.
>
> I'm getting ready to add some extra rules, and RDJ.
> I ran lint -D on the basic config file I have for sa to see what I get
> before adding a bunch of rule files, and got the f
jimsheffer wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I've just set up a new mail server running the latest version of
> spamassassin.
>
> I'm getting ready to add some extra rules, and RDJ.
> I ran lint -D on the basic config file I have for sa to see what I get
> before adding a bunch of rule files, and got the
jimsheffer wrote:
Hi everyone.
I've just set up a new mail server running the latest version of
spamassassin.
I'm getting ready to add some extra rules, and RDJ.
I ran lint -D on the basic config file I have for sa to see what I get
before adding a bunch of rule files, and got the following errors:
jimsheffer wrote:
> config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: rewrite_subject 0
> config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping:
> always_add_headers 1 config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line,
> skipping: auto_learn 1
Those 3 config options are no longer supported.
In the readm
Guys,
Forgive me but what was the fix for URL's with a carriage return? I have this
one that keeps sneaking by:
TIA,
Matt Kettler wrote:
Saurabh Barve wrote:
Hi,
I'm having problems with SpamAssassin-3.0.3 on a Fedora Core 2 machine
along with Sendmail. SpamAssassin is able to identify mail as spam, and
adds its headers to the mail. However, it does not rewrite the subject
header with the `[SPAM]' tag.
He
ÐÐÐ ÐÐÑÐ wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> ÐÐÐ ÐÐÑÐ wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I understood the problem. Amavisd starts spamassassin with user cyrus.
>>> I'm learning spamassassin under each user with sa-learn option -u.
>>> I just wanted that each user had it's own
Matt Kettler wrote:
ÐÐÐ ÐÐÑÐ wrote:
I understood the problem. Amavisd starts spamassassin with user cyrus.
I'm learning spamassassin under each user with sa-learn option -u.
I just wanted that each user had it's own spam base. Then I don't
understand for what purposes option -u i
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
> Having gotten the spam under control, I found that I was getting
> bombed with tons of bounces as well. So I made up a quick ruleset
> to stop undeliverables due to the german spam, using Raymond's
> ruleset as a starting point. You can get it here:
I was working on s
Got this one today. It hit SpamCop but nothing else:
Dear manager:
I have viewed your company profile through internet, and found there
exists an opportunity of establishing business cooperation between two
of us.
We are a Chinese senior precision foundry which producing all kinds of
casting,
FYI, so far I only found 3 of these right-wing mails in my company.
It seems almost all have been blocked by the RBL's in postfix:
- dynablock.njabl.org
- dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
- and a lot of dsl* dial* provider-domain-names I blocked in postfix.
This helps for all kinds of spam from infected pc's so
Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
David B Funk wrote:
Tonight our site is being bombarded by German political spam or
Joe-jobbed bounce fall-out. So far it appears to all be coming
from trojaned PCs. Other than the specific URLs in the messages
havn't found any easily identified parts to create rules for
Anton Krall wrote:
> Any SA rules out there that can catch the german spam mails?
I am only needing to filter on the subjects I quoted because Mailman
has no other option and the mailing list is not using spamassassin.
Simply filtering on the subject is not a great method. But since I am
stuck w
Antonio DeLaCruz wrote:
> How can I make spamassassin not look at the blacklist_from addresses if it
> finds
> a user listed in whitelist_from? Or another way, how can I exclude one user
> from getting the USER_IN_BLACKLIST score?
>
> I have in my user_prefs file:
>
> whitelist_from [EMAIL PROT
Hi!
I have seen a couple of requests for reading the auto-whitelist file in plain
text. You can use at least two database formats, but this command worked for me:
dbmmanage auto-whitelist view
See man dbmmanage for more info (available in most Linux distributions). It
is
written to "Create
trying to train bayes with german spam
so i take a mail out of my imap folder and put it into a sile on the
spamD server..
I Vee-eye it and take out the spamassassin headers ( is this the right
move?) then run the following
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ronan# sa-learn --spam -D spam1
debug: SpamAssa
I'm trying to debug why a specific domain is not triggering
USER_IN_WHITELIST even though the domain is listed in sa-mimedefang as
whitelist_from *@.
White listing is working in general. What conditions does
USER_IN_WHITELIST look for? For example, is it just the From: header or
the envelop o
Matt Kettler wrote:
> I've never played with thunderbird's forward as a attachment feature, but
> you might be able to use that. In this situation you'd need to set up a
> script that strips off the attachment and feeds the attachment to sa-learn.
It creates a message/rfc822 attachment, just l
At 05:42 PM 5/16/2005, Saurabh Barve wrote:
To fix this, I tried to run spamd as the user `mail'. However, when I try
that, I get the error that 'spamd does not have permissions to write to
/root'. How do I get spamd to know that mail's home directory is at
/var/spool/mail.
Set mail's homedir to
"David Velásquez Restrepo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You can use "identify" command to obtain some info about an image.
>
> If you have linux (i hope you do), just type: identify [IMAGE_FILENAME]
> If you need the size of the file just type: ls -l [FILENAME]
>
>
ÐÐÐ ÐÐÑÐ wrote:
>
>>
>>
> I understood the problem. Amavisd starts spamassassin with user cyrus.
> I'm learning spamassassin under each user with sa-learn option -u.
> I just wanted that each user had it's own spam base. Then I don't
> understand for what purposes option -u is used.
-u s
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 01:01 PM 5/16/2005, James R wrote:
Take a look at Thunderbirds redirect plugin. It works well, and only
adds a few lines to the message, along with your mail server's lines.
I have a script that strips those lines off, and the message as
delivered to the client is now what
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 05:42 PM 5/16/2005, Saurabh Barve wrote:
To fix this, I tried to run spamd as the user `mail'. However, when I
try that, I get the error that 'spamd does not have permissions to
write to /root'. How do I get spamd to know that mail's home directory
is at /var/spool/mail.
> What file do I need to edit to change the score on
> ALL_TRUSTED?
trusted_networks. See the wiki or man pages.
Loren
Which config was all that in? local.cf, or user_prefs?
local.cf
Maybe I forgot something?
What does sa-learn --dump magic say?
I understood the problem. Amavisd starts spamassassin with user cyrus.
I'm learning spamassassin under each user with sa-learn option -u.
I just wanted that
Does anyone know the logic behind this spam bombing? I have a friend
who has a gmx.de account and he has gotten 0 german spam in it... yet
here in the u.s. we are getting bombarded by the spam.
Tim B wrote:
> David B Funk wrote:
>> Tonight our site is being bombarded by German political spam or
>> Joe-jobbed bounce fall-out. So far it appears to all be coming from
>> trojaned PCs. Other than the specific URLs in the messages havn't
>> found any easily identified parts to create rules for.
Hello!
I want to use sa-learn on a diffrent server than spamd is running. How can I
tell sa-learn to connect to the right spamd?
Ingo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Something about handling more than 1 messages a day has made me
> decide to run spamd on a different box and go client/server with this
> thing, with full SQL.
>
No automatic AWL expiry.
> Anyway, silly basic q
> >> > - the often seen "Lese selbst" is scored 4
> >>
> >> Just curious, what's that mean to the spammers? google translates it
> >> as "vintage"
> >>
> Never trust automatic translators it is rather "read yourself"
Ohhh, quick! Someone hack a version of this virus that will run all of
thes
Matt Kettler wrote:
Saurabh Barve wrote:
Hi,
I'm having problems with SpamAssassin-3.0.3 on a Fedora Core 2 machine
along with Sendmail. SpamAssassin is able to identify mail as spam, and
adds its headers to the mail. However, it does not rewrite the subject
header with the `[SPAM]' tag.
He
Saurabh Barve wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having problems with SpamAssassin-3.0.3 on a Fedora Core 2 machine
> along with Sendmail. SpamAssassin is able to identify mail as spam, and
> adds its headers to the mail. However, it does not rewrite the subject
> header with the `[SPAM]' tag.
>
> Here
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:37:26AM -0500, Kayne Kruse wrote:
> > From: Elizabeth Schwartz
> >
> > Thanks, just put it in!
> >
> > > http://www.citecs.de/99_sober.cf
> >
>
> Do you see the following problems with this Ruleset? If I move the
> 99_sober.cf, it lint runs w/o error.
I linted it r
Hi everyone.
I've just set up a new mail server running the latest version of
spamassassin.
I'm getting ready to add some extra rules, and RDJ.
I ran lint -D on the basic config file I have for sa to see what I get
before adding a bunch of rule files, and got the following errors: (I
believe thes
At 04:55 PM 5/16/2005, Antonio DeLaCruz wrote:
How can I make spamassassin not look at the blacklist_from addresses if it
finds
a user listed in whitelist_from?
You can't. (read on)
Or another way, how can I exclude one user
from getting the USER_IN_BLACKLIST score?
No.
I have in my user_prefs f
> I'm doing the upgrade to 3.03 through CPAN. I shut down
> spamd for the install process. I dutifully fill in the
> report address, then put in to skip network, Bayes, and
> AWL tests during "make test." I get a warning for an old
> version of Razor2 (2.34, not 2.4) and then everything runs
> f
OK, I uninstalled SA 3.0.0 and did a clean install of 3.0.3, downloaded new
SARE rules and tried again. I am still not getting any URI results. Can any one
explain what happens in the
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x2982e68) implements
'check_post_dnsbl'
section bel
Hi!
I've got some rules in place (thank you guys!) that blocks a lot of
this spam, but now my director is getting emails on her blackberry with
bogus "TO" addresses that doesn't seem to be going thru SpamAssassin.
Any ideas?
What one are you using, the one with the generic header checks may caus
I sent this in on Friday last week and didn't attract any responses.
Any insight would be appreciated. I've seen this behaviour once since
then, despite my cronjob restarting spamd every 4 hours.
Should I just open a bug report?
I'm running spamassassin 3.0.3 as a "proxy" on three mail ser
Having gotten the spam under control, I found that I was getting bombed
with tons of bounces as well. So I made up a quick ruleset to stop
undeliverables due to the german spam, using Raymond's ruleset as a
starting point. You can get it here:
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=GermanSob
Something about handling more than 1 messages a day has made me decide
to run spamd on a different box and go client/server with this thing, with
full SQL.
Anyway, silly basic question. Is there something "automagic" about expiry
of AWL entries? Or is there just some query I can run perio
Can someone check if 3.03 or 3.1 catches this URI obfuscation
spotted in recent spams:
http://hyahlarzvz96ckva9nsn9zvs9.tnashbsv.com\";>Check
it Out
Apparently the backslash at the end of the URI throws off some
parsers such as (unpatched) 3.0.1. Hopefully the same patch that
catc
Hi all,
I have just install SA 3.0.3 running perl 5.6.1.
When i test it with spamassassin -D --lint, i've got this message.
Do i have to worry, because i've no clue how to debug it?
Does anyone also got this error?
...
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x8c8e3d4)
implements
wolfgang wrote:
> there is one online that is based on the typical message-ids
> used by that current virus based spam wave and on a few
> additonal indicators from those mails. i find it a bit risky -
> anyway, here is the URL:
>
> http://weir.dattitu.de/archives/9-Filtering-Sober-P.html
>
> r
Elizabeth Schwartz wrote:
> As a university we have legitimate correspondance with people in
> *every* country so I have to be very careful about blocking IP's or
> character sets or other such broad applications.
I think a good help for that is amavisd-new and his new policy banks.
http://www.ij
> Since I have legitimate users communicating all over the world, I am
> very interested in other rulesets that would block spam in languages
> besides English. Not sure how big of a problem this is - I know we get
I believe there is a Chinese project to make a ruleset for chinese spam.
I've seen
At 04:19 PM 5/16/2005, Jay Ehrhart wrote:
What file do I need to edit to change the score on
ALL_TRUSTED?
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf (or similar):
score ALL_TRUSTED -1.0
But before you do that, make sure you are adjusting the score for the right
reason. If you've got ALL_TRUSTED matching
> From: Elizabeth Schwartz
>
> Thanks, just put it in!
>
> > http://www.citecs.de/99_sober.cf
>
Do you see the following problems with this Ruleset? If I move the
99_sober.cf, it lint runs w/o error.
debug: URIDNSBL: domains to query:
debug: Running tests for priority: 0
debug: running head
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> At 07:21 AM 5/8/2005, jdow wrote:
> >This text sailed right through all the SARE rules except one ratware
> >rule:
> >
> >===8<---
> >X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_80,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
> > RATWR10a_MESSID,URIBL_SBL autolearn=d
Which config was all that in? local.cf, or user_prefs?
local.cf
Maybe I forgot something?
What does sa-learn --dump magic say?
I understood the problem. Amavisd starts spamassassin with user cyrus.
I'm learning spamassassin under each user with sa-learn option -u.
I just wanted that
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> At 07:21 AM 5/8/2005, jdow wrote:
> >This text sailed right through all the SARE rules except one ratware
> >rule:
> >
> >===8<---
> >X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_80,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
> > RATWR10a_MESSID,URIBL_SBL autolearn=disa
>> Thanks, just put it in!
>>
>> > http://www.citecs.de/99_sober.cf
>>
>> > - the often seen "Lese selbst" is scored 4
>>
>> Just curious, what's that mean to the spammers? google translates it
>> as "vintage"
>>
Never trust automatic translators it is rather "read yourself"
Wolfgang Hama
At 01:01 PM 5/16/2005, James R wrote:
Take a look at Thunderbirds redirect plugin. It works well, and only adds
a few lines to the message, along with your mail server's lines. I have a
script that strips those lines off, and the message as delivered to the
client is now what is trained upon.
Un
At 07:21 AM 5/8/2005, jdow wrote:
This text sailed right through all the SARE rules except one ratware
rule:
===8<---
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_80,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
RATWR10a_MESSID,URIBL_SBL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
Status:
You will see how great this storewid
>...
>>...
>> whitelist at surbl dot org
>
>Jeff, thanks for the submission address, i'll send a Bcc there and also post
>the list below to uribl's submission form.
>
>frankly, i find it too much effort to check if they are blacklisted, so i will
>just list some more german domains that i cons
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 02:05:09PM -0400, Elizabeth Schwartz wrote:
> Thanks, just put it in!
>
> > http://www.citecs.de/99_sober.cf
>
> > - the often seen "Lese selbst" is scored 4
>
> Just curious, what's that mean to the spammers? google translates it
> as "vintage"
It means "read by yoursel
I've been getting hit with a lot of german spam that has two exact words, and
then .de urls. This rule handles them well.
rawbody __XM_Pash01 /^(?:Lese\s*selbst|Full\s*Article):$/i
rawbody __XM_Pash02 m{^http://[^/\n]+\.de/(?>.*)$}i
rawbody __XM_Pash03
m{(?!^(?
David B Funk wrote:
Tonight our site is being bombarded by German political spam or
Joe-jobbed bounce fall-out. So far it appears to all be coming
from trojaned PCs. Other than the specific URLs in the messages
havn't found any easily identified parts to create rules for.
anybody else seeing this?
Hi,
OS - Fedora Core 2
SpamAssassin - version 3.0.3
I have the following options set for spamd in /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin:
SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -c -m5 -H"
But I keep getting this message in my logs:
spamd[19758]: info: setuid to root succeeded
spamd[19758]: Still running as root: user not specified
I thought I would leave you with a random thought from my head :)
I would think the tech of SA would transfer over completely well to crime
fighting. Rules and Bayes designed to filter thru new criminal records and
pull up flags that might link them to other crimes. Could be used on a
record corpa
How can I make spamassassin not look at the blacklist_from addresses if it finds
a user listed in whitelist_from? Or another way, how can I exclude one user
from getting the USER_IN_BLACKLIST score?
I have in my user_prefs file:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I uninstalled SA 3.0.0 and did a clean install of 3.0.3, downloaded new
SARE rules and tried again. I am still not getting any URI results. Can any one
explain what happens in the
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x2982e68) implements
'check_post_dnsbl'
section bel
What file do I need to edit to change the score on
ALL_TRUSTED?
Thank you
88 matches
Mail list logo
