Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
> I aggree, and this is probably the reason most of the times. I just
> felt it was necessary to comment on your *never*. It_is_likely that
> ALL_TRUSTED will misfire as long as it trusts unparseable headers
> containing whatever IP-addresses. Generally we should acknowle
I am running OpenBSD 3.6, on which I am using spamd, smtp-vilter, and
sendmail. When spamd calls dccproc I am trying to use additional
options with the dcc_options no matter what I seem to put in there it
always spits out the usage options, but if I run dccproc by hand it
doesnt give any error
Codger wrote:
> Is there a problem with emails sent from microsoft word via eamil (and
> thus with mime) and SA?
>
> I have one user getting persistent recorrent bounces.
What do the bounces say?
Is there a problem with emails sent from microsoft word via eamil (and
thus with mime) and SA?
I have one user getting persistent recorrent bounces.
I'm *almost* done setting this up (again), and am trying to sprt out the
user ID problem. I'd previously been running everything as root, and it all
worked. I'm uncomfortable doing this, though, and so am trying to run
everything as user spamassassin. I've got spamd running properly, I think,
bu
The server is NATed. I'll try setting a trust path and see what happens.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 10:09 AM
> To: Arvinn Løkkebakken; Matt Kettler
> Cc: ROY,RHETT G; 'users@spamassassin.apache.org'
> Subject: Re:
"Jean Caron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 04/01/2005 10:19:13 AM:
> You're not alone Don ! hehe...
>
> I was waiting for replies after your first post. Now with this one,
I should
> be able to make some sense of this autolearn feature within my setup.
> Already something is clearer (clear as
Chris wrote:
>I subscribe to the EFF Newsletter, it keeps repeatedly getting tagged as spam.
>
>I've put the 'from' address in my manual whitelist which has helped to lower
>the score to a tad above my spam threshold of 5.0. I've saved some of the
>previous editions and am wondering if I ran s
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:56:32AM -0600, Chris wrote:
> On Thursday 31 March 2005 11:55 pm, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> > > Here's the latest one to come in:
> > >
> > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0
> > > tests=AWL,BAYES_50,PYZOR_CHECK, SARE_MILLIONSOF,SARE_MONEYTERMS
> > > autolearn=dis
You're not alone Don ! hehe...
I was waiting for replies after your first post. Now with this one, I should
be able to make some sense of this autolearn feature within my setup.
Already something is clearer (clear as mud), since I'm trashing msgs with a
score greater than 10, I probably will n
Don Levey wrote:
> Please forgive me if this is in the archives; I'm having trouble
> finding it.
>
> I've just finished training my Bayes DB using sa-learn (perversely,
> when I was trying to collect 200 spam messages, the spammers decided
> to stop sending to me). Now that the DB is usable, it's
>-Original Message-
>From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:28 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: EFF Newsletter as SPAM
>
>
>On Thursday 31 March 2005 08:56 pm, Jeff Chan wrote:
>> On Thursday, March 31, 2005, 6:50:17 PM, Chris Chris wro
I'd noticed a number of FPs on the chickenpox ruleset from .doc, .ppt
files.
HTH
R
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 April 2005 15:05
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: SA Rules
>
> Trying to cleanup any rules that might be
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 1:47 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Testing new rules with lint
>
>
>
>
>
>
>If i create new rules in cf files i must restart spamd
>to test these new rules with spamassa
I could be wrong, but I believe spamd is only used for spamc. If you
are using spamassassin, it loads the files everytime. At least, that's
what I've understood the difference to be between spamd/spamc and
spamassassin.
If I'm wrong, I do apologize. I'm sure you'll get a more official
response
Trying to cleanup any rules that might be outdated or a hinderance on our
server, was wondering if I still needed the rules listed below:
chickenpox.cf
weeds2.cf
random.cf
70_sare_unsub.cf
70_sare_uri.cf
Thanks
Robert
On Thursday 31 March 2005 11:55 pm, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> > Here's the latest one to come in:
> >
> > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0
> > tests=AWL,BAYES_50,PYZOR_CHECK, SARE_MILLIONSOF,SARE_MONEYTERMS
> > autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
> > X-Spam-Rep
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:07 AM 3/31/2005, Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
You have a broken trust path. ALL_TRUSTED should *never* match email
from outside your network.
But it does anyway, even when trust path is set correctly:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2508
Hmm. Well, that h
If i create new rules in cf files i must restart spamd
to test these new rules with spamassassin --lint
Is there annother way to check each rule before restarting spamd?
What happens if i restart spamd and a message is in the queue or filtering
process (SA)?
Im using Postfix 2.1 with pers-use
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:27:58PM -0600, Chris wrote:
> On Thursday 31 March 2005 08:56 pm, Jeff Chan wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 31, 2005, 6:50:17 PM, Chris Chris wrote:
> > > I subscribe to the EFF Newsletter, it keeps repeatedly getting tagged as
> > > spam. I've put the 'from' address in my
Hello Rocky,
Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 7:34:05 PM, you wrote:
RO> Before i pull my hair out doing bench/resource test, i was wondering if
RO> anyone out there knew if there was much of a speed/resource usage
RO> difference between the following way of writing the same rule.
RO> Method A:
RO> bo
On Mar 31, 2005 5:46 PM, AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> >>The problem is, it seems that sa-learn is ignoring the -u / --user= flag.
> >
> >sa-learn uses the userid of the user that calls it. Period.
>
> Then why does man sa-learn show a -u flag:
>
> Is this obsol
On Thursday 31 March 2005 08:56 pm, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Thursday, March 31, 2005, 6:50:17 PM, Chris Chris wrote:
> > I subscribe to the EFF Newsletter, it keeps repeatedly getting tagged as
> > spam. I've put the 'from' address in my manual whitelist which has helped
> > to lower the score to a t
is procmail running before or after SA?
if sa is running after procmail, you should just be able to do
header CF_DEAR_OCCUPANTX-Procmail =~/\[DEAR-OCCUPANT\]/
at least afaik.
-Rocky
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 06:54:12PM -0800, Vicki Brown wrote:
> I have some X-headers I'm adding with Pr
On Thursday, March 31, 2005, 6:50:17 PM, Chris Chris wrote:
> I subscribe to the EFF Newsletter, it keeps repeatedly getting tagged as
> spam.
> I've put the 'from' address in my manual whitelist which has helped to lower
> the score to a tad above my spam threshold of 5.0. I've saved some of t
I have some X-headers I'm adding with Procmail, e.g.
X-Procmail: [DEAR-OCCUPANT]
I thought that SA's "ALL" header test type would do the trick for matching
these but it doesn't seem to be triggering.
The rule
header CF_DEAR_OCCUPANT ALL =~ /\[DEAR-OCCUPANT\]/
score CF_DEAR_OCCUPANT
I subscribe to the EFF Newsletter, it keeps repeatedly getting tagged as spam.
I've put the 'from' address in my manual whitelist which has helped to lower
the score to a tad above my spam threshold of 5.0. I've saved some of the
previous editions and am wondering if I ran sa-learn --ham on the
Matt Kettler wrote:
Chip wrote:
The problem is, it seems that sa-learn is ignoring the -u / --user= flag.
Of course it's ignoring it. There is no -u flag in sa-learn. ONLY spamc
and spamd accept that flag.
sa-learn uses the userid of the user that calls it. Period.
No offence meant here.
28 matches
Mail list logo
