Re: Pb with spamassassin_tools

At 05:47 PM 2/14/2005, francois.baert wrote: On the other hand spamassassin-tools-3.0.2-1.i386.rpm claims that Parse::Syslog ans Statistics::Distributions are needed. I install those two modules by perl -MCPAN -e shell. The variable @INC contains the directories we need and in fact in /usr/lib/perl

Pb with spamassassin_tools

Hello, I got the rpm's from rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.2.tar.gz perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.2-1.i386.rpm and spamassassin-3.0.2-1.i386.rpm install without Pb. On the other hand spamassassin-tools-3.0.2-1.i386.rpm claims that Parse::Syslog ans Statistics::Distributions are needed. I instal

Re: Care and feeding instructions for SpamAssassin?

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:48:37 -0500, FH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Just out of curiosity why is it not a good idea to run spamd as > `nobody`? Some distros run many daemons as 'nobody' or have files that are readable by nobody. It's more that running spamassassin as it's own user is BETTER then

Re: sa-learn ham from my emails

On Feb 14, 2005, at 2:54 PM, Jim Maul wrote: Daniel Cañas wrote: I have over 2000 emails that I have as ham and would like to feed to sa-learn.. The emails are all mine (that is they are addresed to me) is this a problem for sa-learn? Will it learn the headers and mark my email address as a token

Re: sa-learn ham from my emails

On Feb 14, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Thomas Arend wrote: Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 20:50 schrieb Daniel Cañas: I have over 2000 emails that I have as ham and would like to feed to sa-learn.. You should train them as ham. That is my plan The emails are all mine (that is they are addresed to me) is this a

Re: sa-learn ham from my emails

Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 20:50 schrieb Daniel Cañas: > I have over 2000 emails that I have as ham and would like to feed to > sa-learn.. You should train them as ham. > > The emails are all mine (that is they are addresed to me) is this a > problem for sa-learn? Where is the problem? If they

Re: sa-learn ham from my emails

Daniel Cañas wrote: I have over 2000 emails that I have as ham and would like to feed to sa-learn.. The emails are all mine (that is they are addresed to me) is this a problem for sa-learn? Will it learn the headers and mark my email address as a token for ham... causing bayes to not work corr

sa-learn ham from my emails

I have over 2000 emails that I have as ham and would like to feed to sa-learn.. The emails are all mine (that is they are addresed to me) is this a problem for sa-learn? Will it learn the headers and mark my email address as a token for ham... causing bayes to not work correctly for my address

Re: Care and feeding instructions for SpamAssassin?

-- Original Message -- Received: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:55:10 AM EST From: Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: FH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Care and feeding instructions for SpamAssassin? > Hello FH, > > Thursday, February 10, 2005, 11:48:37 AM, yo

Re: spamd hanging or looping

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:30:01PM +0100, Henk van Lingen wrote: > > with latest versions? What is the absolute last message that is logged? > > It's not specific to one message, it seems. Currently there's another > message in my queue with the same prob. For the same user, however.

Re: "Not found: pass = SPF_PASS"

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:46:20PM -0500, Steve Prior wrote: > As it happens I do use sendmail and will have to add the sendmail.cf change > you mentioned, but is this actually needed for the self test to work? > Unless the self test is broken, it would seem like something else is > also going on.

Re: "Not found: pass = SPF_PASS"

Sandy S wrote: Do you use Sendmail? If so, you may have to configure it to expose the sender address. This information is in the USAGE file that comes with the Spamassassin install: " - A very handy new feature is SPF support, which allows you to check that the message sender is permitted by

Re: "Not found: pass = SPF_PASS"

On 2/14/2005 1:36 PM, Sandy S wrote: > Do you use Sendmail? Alas no, and Postfix has no means by which it can add an envelope header before handing off to the proxy filter unfortunately. -- Eric A. Hallhttp://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols

Re: "Not found: pass = SPF_PASS"

Eric Hall wrote: > Symptomatically, SA runs but SPF apparently does not. SA reports that it > cannot determine the envelope sender, and when it drops down to host-level > parsing, the process ends abruptly. > Do you use Sendmail? If so, you may have to configure it to expose the sender address.

Re: "Not found: pass = SPF_PASS"

On 2/14/2005 12:57 PM, Andy Jezierski wrote: > What version of Net::DNS do you have installed? cpan> install Net::DNS CPAN: Storable loaded ok Going to read /usr/lib/perl5/cpan/Metadata Database was generated on Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:45:39 GMT Net::DNS is up to date. None of the DNS tests repor

Re: "Not found: pass = SPF_PASS"

"Eric A. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/14/2005 11:53:48 AM: > > I'm having some kind of problem with SPF and SA 3.02. SPF hasn't worked > for me since 3.0 actually, but I'm trying to nail down why, and am using > 3.0.2 to try and figure this out. > > Symptomatically, SA runs but SPF app

"Not found: pass = SPF_PASS"

I'm having some kind of problem with SPF and SA 3.02. SPF hasn't worked for me since 3.0 actually, but I'm trying to nail down why, and am using 3.0.2 to try and figure this out. Symptomatically, SA runs but SPF apparently does not. SA reports that it cannot determine the envelope sender, and whe

Re: Error during Bayes DB upgrade

Michael Parker wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote: Any ideas how I can get around this? Find this line in the backup.txt file and remove it, then start the restore again. Michael Thanks. I had hoped for a different solution since the backup.txt fil

Re: Spamassassin with sa-learn

Please post messages in plaintext in the future. Thanks. Tinni wrote: > I am little bit confused of *sa-learn*. I have installed SA 3.02. I > did not set any bayes path in local.cf . When i am checking with > > #spamassassin -lint -D > > it is showing a path as [snip] < debug: bayes: 7103 tie-

RE: article: SpamAssassin Takes Top Anti-Spam Honors

> >> SpamAssassin Takes Top Anti-Spam Honors >> February 9, 2005 >> By Sharon Gaudin > >> Receiving twice as many votes as the closest contender, SpamAssassin >> took top honors in the Anti-Spam category of Datamation's >Product of the >> Year 2005 Awards. > >Congrats SpamAssassin folks! Super b

RE: users-unsubscribe

404 unsubcribe not found. 500 rejected by [EMAIL PROTECTED] for being unsubmissive. Sorry I culdn't resist ;) You want this: list-unsubscribe: Its in the headers. --Chris

Re: bayesian filter training

Robert Menschel wrote: Hello Matias, Friday, February 11, 2005, 5:32:10 AM, you wrote: MLB> A couple of weeks ago I started storing the spam flagged messages MLB> by SA. Currently, I have like 20400 messages stored, I'm planing MLB> to sa-learn them, but now I got another question ;) MLB> The sa

Re: diferent rules hitting with diferent users

Robert Menschel wrote: Hello Matías, Friday, February 11, 2005, 1:35:19 PM, you wrote: It's also hitting BAYES_99, which means your global Bayes database (since you're running as root) thinks for sure this is NOT spam. You've got a problem with the emails you've been learning in the past. MLB> Th

Re[2]: Less spam blocked with 3.02 - AWL-related?

Hello Johann, Sunday, February 13, 2005, 11:07:01 PM, you wrote: This should not have anything to do with your problem, but from your debut listing I noticed, JS> debug: config: read file /etc/spamassassin/70_sare_genlsubj.cf JS> debug: config: read file /etc/spamassassin/70_sare_genlsubj0.cf JS

Re: Does sa-learn -u WORK?!

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 09:57:21AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > > It appears that the parameter is not documented in the manpages: > http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html It's possible these are a rev or two out of date. -u was added in 3.0.2 I think. Always, always,

RE: Does sa-learn -u WORK?!

If you do a sa-learn --help, it says one of the options is -u username But anyway, it does not seem to work. I ended up using the bayes_path switch (recommended by another list user!) in local.cf, and it works. I can now run sa-learn from root and it will access the spamd files Thanks again for

Re: Does sa-learn -u WORK?!

At 09:08 AM 2/14/2005, Michael Parker wrote: sa-learn -u is really only meant for virtual user environments, and probably best used for SQL based bayes configs. The user you are running sa-learn as still needs to have permissions on the bayes files you are working with. Such a thing even exists?

users-unsubscribe

RE: Does sa-learn -u WORK?!

At 07:34 AM 2/14/2005, Austin Weidner wrote: I think you missed my point. I am trying to launch sa-learn from root. Two reasons, one I don't want spamd to have shell access, and two I am writing a script. No, -u does not work with sa-learn. It is not in the docs, and never has been. However, you c

Re: WhiteListing question

At 09:40 AM 2/14/2005, Andy Norris wrote: I have some email coming through with v3.0.1 that has high scores but the report says whitelisted. I've looked in 60_whitelist.cf and my own rules file and don't see any rules that would whitelist these emails. Is there any way to get the report to descr

WhiteListing question

Hi, I have some email coming through with v3.0.1 that has high scores but the report says whitelisted. I've looked in 60_whitelist.cf and my own rules file and don't see any rules that would whitelist these emails. Is there any way to get the report to describe WHY it was whitelisted? Thanks, A

Re: spamd hanging or looping

It seems to be the same problem with stock 3.01 too, alas. /Per Eric -- ^): Per Eric Rosén http://rosnix.nu/~per/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG 7A7A BD68 ADC0 01E1 F560 79FD 33D1 1EC3 1EBB 7311

Re: Does sa-learn -u WORK?!

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:59:38AM -0500, Austin Weidner wrote: > My spamassassin is running as user spamd > > If I try to do a: > > sa-learn -u spamd --dump magic > > Just to see what is happening, I get: > > ERROR: Bayes dump returned error, please re-run with -D for more information > > Aft

Re: Error during Bayes DB upgrade

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote: > > Finally, I did an "sa-learn -D --restore backup.txt". Everything seems > to run fine for a while, but finally fails with: > > debug: bayes: seen_put: SQL Error: Duplicate entry > '11-!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAHAAOKG7EAXl

Re: spamd hanging or looping

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:39:43AM -0800, Loren Wilton wrote: > tests=ALL_TRUSTED,MISSING_DATE,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_REAL_NAME > > debug: > subtests=__HAS_MSGID,__MSGID_OK_DIGITS,__MSGID_OK_HOST,__SANE_MSGID,__UNUSAB > LE_MSGID > > Unless this example mail came from a local machine, this

Re: Does sa-learn -u WORK?!

I've never had a use for the -u option for sa-learn myself. I just use "su amavis -c sa-learn" instead. However, I believe that if you are going to use "-u", you also need to specify the prefspath and the dbpath. Austin Weidner wrote: I think you missed my point. I am trying to launch sa-lear

Re: spamd 3.02 catched in a loop?

Hi. Try to increase max_children to 10 or may be more. > Hi. > SA 3.02 sometimes seems to stop parsing a message, stop producing debug > output and using 100% CPU until killed. I'm running spamd with 5 child > processes, called from exim 3 with spamc as a filter (although this > sholdn't matter

The source of all Internet spam

<http://www.dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/dilbert-20050214.html> I just *knew* it... :-) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Yours sincerely Dipl. Inform. Ralph Seichter HORUS-IT Ahornweg 10 D-57635 Oberirsen Tel +49 2686 987880 Fax +49 2686 987889 http://horus-it.de/

Error during Bayes DB upgrade

Hi all. I've got SA 3.02 installed on a new box. I've copied over the Bayes database from my 2.64 installation and done "sa-learn --sync" followed by "sa-learn --backup > backup.txt".I then added the following to my local.cf file: bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::

Re: spamd hanging or looping

tests=ALL_TRUSTED,MISSING_DATE,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_REAL_NAME > debug: subtests=__HAS_MSGID,__MSGID_OK_DIGITS,__MSGID_OK_HOST,__SANE_MSGID,__UNUSAB LE_MSGID Unless this example mail came from a local machine, this indicates that you have a configuration problem. Spam shouldn't be able to hit ALL_TR

Re: Less spam blocked with 3.02 - AWL-related?

> I have installed them after visiting www.rulesemporium.com. It is not > easy to see there which rules "will hit mor on spam and less on ham". Yes it is. The rulesets that claim to be dangerous have a chance of hitting more ham. Which is why they are dangerous. In general, many rules comes in

spamd 3.02 catched in a loop?

Hi. SA 3.02 sometimes seems to stop parsing a message, stop producing debug output and using 100% CPU until killed. I'm running spamd with 5 child processes, called from exim 3 with spamc as a filter (although this sholdn't matter I suppose) and when all availible spamd children are stuck mail isn

RE: Does sa-learn -u WORK?!

I think you missed my point. I am trying to launch sa-learn from root. Two reasons, one I don't want spamd to have shell access, and two I am writing a script. If anyone else knows why this feature doesn't work, please let me know! -Original Message- From: Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank

Re: spamd hanging or looping

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:03:56AM +0100, Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote: > Is there anything specific with the message? (well, there most likely is :-) > ). What kind of message is it? Are Perl and all related modules up to date > with latest versions? What is the absolute last message th

Re: Less spam blocked with 3.02 - AWL-related?

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 12:07:44PM +0100, Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote: > > debug: diag: module installed: MIME::Base64, version 2.12 > > You should upgrade that one This on a Debian Woody system. I have installed it from www.backports.org and it is the latest one available for Debian. >

RE: Less spam blocked with 3.02 - AWL-related?

> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:37:06AM -0500, Chris Santerre wrote: > > > > > > > >> > 4) Can you share the output from a --lint with us? > > >> $ spamassassin --lint > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ > > > > > >What about spamassassin -D --lint? > > > > > >Kind Regards, > > >Sander Holthaus > > > > LOL,

received-header parsing-error, Qmail and ALL_TRUSTED

Some times my front-end qmail MX creates a Received header likes this: Received: from flh1aai099.gif.mesh.ad.jp (@203.136.34.99) by my.qmail.mx.example.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2005 06:41:22 - When SpamAssasssin parses this Received header I get this: debug: received-header: unknown format: from

Does sa-learn -u WORK?!

My spamassassin is running as user spamd If I try to do a: sa-learn -u spamd --dump magic Just to see what is happening, I get: ERROR: Bayes dump returned error, please re-run with -D for more information After doing the -D, I can see that it is still thinking it is root. If I login to spamd

Re: Less spam blocked with 3.02 - AWL-related?

On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:17:37AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > I don't understand how you read that to think you should put a server IP > after test. Perhaps you should read it again, but this time realize that > the "13 servers" in the description is a misnomer. > > Clearly "domain.tld" shoul

Re: Less spam blocked with 3.02 - AWL-related?

On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:37:06AM -0500, Chris Santerre wrote: > > > > >> > 4) Can you share the output from a --lint with us? > >> $ spamassassin --lint > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ > > > >What about spamassassin -D --lint? > > > >Kind Regards, > >Sander Holthaus > > LOL, yeah I need to start typi

Frustrating spam assassin problem

I've done a lot of SA installs before, but this one is really giving me a problem. Basically, unless I put: dns_available no In my local.cf file, SA is taking 20-25 seconds to process a message. I think it is timing out somehow on something DNS related. With dns_available no in there, it is taking

RE: spamd hanging or looping

Is there anything specific with the message? (well, there most likely is :-) ). What kind of message is it? Are Perl and all related modules up to date with latest versions? What is the absolute last message that is logged? Kind Regards, Sander Holthaus > -Original Message- > From: Henk v

Re: sa-learn fails on certain spams with "out of memory" error

>I'm running SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on an OpenBSD 3.6-STABLE machine, > on an AMD64 3000+ with 2GB of RAM. I have yet to see this machine > even touch the second gig of RAM, and it's never been into swap. > >This is a new server, so I'm trying to train Bayes using a corpus > I've been saving