Re: Plugins modifying a message

2005-01-08 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Felix Schwarz wrote: Hello all, I'm currently evaluating CRM114 and DSPAM and want to know how they could improve the SpamAssassin filtering. I already found Eugene's (Morozov) messages on this list (March-Mai 2004) but I would like to know if there are some new answers beside the one given in http

Re: A very long spam

2005-01-08 Thread Christopher John Shaker
You can 'sa-learn --ham' from mail folders, which the email user already read and culled for spam. After I did that, my baysian filter got surprisingly accurate. Chris Shaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Dave Hills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005

Re: A very long spam

2005-01-08 Thread Dave Hills
I try to train as much HAM as I can but I don't think it's possible to train HAM/SPAM equally as 90% of incoming email is SPAM. On Jan 8, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: At 04:34 AM 1/9/2005 +0700, you wrote: Hi all, Greetings. I've just joined the list. I've been using sa-learn with SA 2

Re: A very long spam

2005-01-08 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Sunday 09 January 2005 04:47 am, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 04:34 AM 1/9/2005 +0700, you wrote: > >Hi all, > >Greetings. I've just joined the list. > > > >I've been using sa-learn with SA 2.64 and 3.0.2 > >One thing is bugging me though. Is it safe to teach SA on a very long spam > >such as the st

Re: A very long spam

2005-01-08 Thread Matt Kettler
At 04:34 AM 1/9/2005 +0700, you wrote: Hi all, Greetings. I've just joined the list. I've been using sa-learn with SA 2.64 and 3.0.2 One thing is bugging me though. Is it safe to teach SA on a very long spam such as the stock report spam? Will it cause many False Positive? Why would you think it wo

Re: RelayCountry

2005-01-08 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 01/08/05 12:34 PM, Bill Landry sat at the `puter and typed: > - Original Message - > From: "Robin Lynn Frank (SA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Rodney Richison wrote: > > > I'm having a bit of trouble finding information on, and using > > > > > > loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin:

A very long spam

2005-01-08 Thread Fajar Priyanto
Hi all, Greetings. I've just joined the list. I've been using sa-learn with SA 2.64 and 3.0.2 One thing is bugging me though. Is it safe to teach SA on a very long spam such as the stock report spam? Will it cause many False Positive? Thanks -- Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | http

Re: RelayCountry

2005-01-08 Thread Michele Neylon::Blacknight Solutions
Bill Landry wrote: Indeed! Better to look at something like http://countries.nerd.dk/more.html for adding weight based on message source country. Here is a sample of how to implement these in SA as RBL tests: How accurate and up to date is that data? -- Email scanned by Blacknight for viruses a

Re: RelayCountry

2005-01-08 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: "Robin Lynn Frank (SA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Rodney Richison wrote: > > I'm having a bit of trouble finding information on, and using > > > > loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry > > > > Though, I've installed the module needed via cpan, and

Re: RelayCountry

2005-01-08 Thread Robin Lynn Frank (SA)
Rodney Richison wrote: I'm having a bit of trouble finding information on, and using loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry Though, I've installed the module needed via cpan, and enabled it in my local.cf file, I do not know what it does exactly. I would like to give a score based

Re: annoying changes in 3.0

2005-01-08 Thread Faisal N. Jawdat
I think changing the config options from release to release makes it very hard for sites larger than a couple users to upgrade, because you have to rely on every user updating their config when you upgrade. The "UPGRADE" file helps with this somewhat, but it's more geared for admins than users

RelayCountry

2005-01-08 Thread Rodney Richison
I'm having a bit of trouble finding information on, and using loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry Though, I've installed the module needed via cpan, and enabled it in my local.cf file, I do not know what it does exactly. I would like to give a score based on country's outside t

Re: Howto remove the X-Spam-Report: tag

2005-01-08 Thread Nix
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Roel Bindels murmured woefully: > Can anyone help me with my problem. I do not want SA to set the > X-Spam-Report: tag in the mail header or mailbody, but I can't find the > option how to set this. remove_header X-Spam-Report -- `The sword we forged has turned upon us Only n

Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 Path Problems

2005-01-08 Thread Rainer Sokoll
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 12:18:48PM +1100, Paul Grenda wrote: > After trying to install Spamassasasin 3.0.2 using the rpmbuild withour > success, I have managed to install it using perl Makefile.PL, make, make > install and it seems to have been largely sucessful except it no longer > seems to be a

Re: SA 3 - I'm Totally Stuck!

2005-01-08 Thread Keith Whyte
bubba wrote: Hi, I've made some progress, but it's still not working :( It would be more helpful in a case like this, if you were to post the details of what you discovered. What did you change to make the progress? what are the permissions on / ? on /usr ? on /usr/bin ? Any other suggestions?

Re: blocking korean 1 image mails

2005-01-08 Thread Thomas Arend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2005 03:15 schrieb nadim: > HI, > [..] > The spam I get consist of a one single image. Is there something I can do > to mark them? I got not so many of these. I inspected one an it got a high score of 31.5 points. Question back:

Re: More URI tests to drive up scores (was Re: Implicit trust of surbl and sbl)

2005-01-08 Thread Jeff Chan
On Friday, January 7, 2005, 9:02:47 PM, List User wrote: > I have used the following rules (which greatly overlap the existing > URI > rules) to drive up scores, while not repeating the same tests or increasing > the > scores for existing tests. YMMV, but they work for me (v3.0.x). > u

More URI tests to drive up scores (was Re: Implicit trust of surbl and sbl)

2005-01-08 Thread List Mail User
I have used the following rules (which greatly overlap the existing URI rules) to drive up scores, while not repeating the same tests or increasing the scores for existing tests. YMMV, but they work for me (v3.0.x). uridnsblURIBL_COMPLETEWHOIS combined-HIB.dnsiplists.complet

Re: Implicit trust of surbl and sbl

2005-01-08 Thread Jeff Chan
On Friday, January 7, 2005, 2:03:48 PM, William Stearns wrote: > I personally have trust in the surbl's, so I have no problem > recommending that people increase the score if they want. Might I humbly > recommend increasing the surbl score to something between 2 and 5, so that > if surbl

Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 Path Problems

2005-01-08 Thread Loren Wilton
> no longer seems to be able to find my local.cf (see another thread on this > forum). local.cf seems to have moved around in various installs on various platforms. Search around and see if there is a default local.cf in some other directory, perhaps /etc/mail/spamassassin. Your problem with t

SpamAssassin 3.0.2 Path Problems

2005-01-08 Thread Paul Grenda
After trying to install Spamassasasin 3.0.2 using the rpmbuild withour success, I have managed to install it using perl Makefile.PL, make, make install and it seems to have been largely sucessful except it no longer seems to be able to find my local.cf (see another thread on this forum). Now I thi

blocking korean 1 image mails

2005-01-08 Thread nadim
HI, Spam from Korea really s... because you can't even read it :-) I don't think I am the only one getting korean spam lately. One single honest mail to a korean friend and you end up in a good-to-spam list. The spam I get consist of a one single image. Is there something I can do to mark them

Re: Win32, Autodeleting messages with high scores?

2005-01-08 Thread Jerry
I am running SA 3 with Modus Mail (www.vircom.com). Whenever any mail comes in the system will fire off a batch file that will call SA. Currently not running any gateways for SA. Any good suggestions for win32? TIA Anyone have any examples of how to read the "X-Spam-Level: "

RE: Problems with upgrade to SA 3.0.1

2005-01-08 Thread Paul Grenda
Thanks Michele, > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, 26 December 2004 8:43 AM > To: Paul Grenda > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Problems with upgrade to SA 3.0.1 > > > Paul Grenda wrote: > > I recently upgraded to S

Re: annoying changes in 3.0

2005-01-08 Thread Loren Wilton
Of course, when breaking old interfaces and adding new, the proper way (in the commercial software world, at least) is to have one release that supports both the old and new interfaces, so the users have a chance to change things at their own speed, rather than having to rebuild everything to us