Thanks again J, your comments makes sense so far. Maybe someone will
know how a consistent SLD hopped admittedly through too many machines
but appeared to be received(2) by my email server on ainaz.pair.com.
This just does not make sense and I can produce at least a half dozen more
"CONFIRMED_FORG
It means your address is in a set of DSL addresses listed as Dial Up
addresses. Ye verily thou art stuck in the fork.
And indeed, it should only be used on mail that is incoming from the
Internet. Local mail should bypass the SpamAssassin checks. That way
cron job emails to root will not get filte
Here is the reply I got from sorbs.net when I asked about my ip being listed
there, now, would someone be so kind as to explain to me what the reply
means. Note: I'm not running a mail server, as I said, all I was doing
was trying to get fetchmail > procmail to work to take some of the load of
At this point you're stuck reading the "FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD" tests in
the 20_headers.cf file (at least on 2.63.) On my machine this is in
/usr/share/spamassassin. On closer look it appears this is a web mail
posting via yahoo to a yahoo group that fribbles is way around way more
yahoo machines than m
--On Saturday, November 27, 2004 12:42 PM -0800 jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I nearly cried when I took that machine down.
I know what you mean. I always feel like I'm shooting my dog when I have to
bounce the system. Right now I've got a game server suffering a couple of
WINE zombies becaus
Thanks jdow. The reason I believe it is because I know "newuser1" to be
legitimate however the path the message takes getting to me through SA
generates FP's consistently. Can someone familiar with what causes
SA to confirm forgery, identify the specific cause?
--Roger
- Original Message
Er, Roger, one might ask you what makes you think for a picosecond
that the message is not forged. Trace the headers backwards starting
at the top. I see nothing there to inspire belief in the headers below
the second "Received:" header.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Jolly ArrRoger" <
Duncan Findlay wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 01:37:57PM -0500, David Brodbeck wrote:
I reboot Linux servers when I need to upgrade the kernel, upgrade the
BIOS, or have a startup script change that needs to be tested. Don't
overlook that last one, it's less inconvenient to reboot right away
From: "Dan Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Excuse the bandwidth, but someone on this list is going to know. I've
always
> tried to reboot windoze boxes at least monthly. Back in "the day", I'd
> reboot IBM mainframes each Standard/Daylight Savings transition, just
> because I had to be on-site on a
Can someone please explain why SA declares forgery on the attached message?
Seem to be getting an excessive number of false positives from legitimate
yahoo.com email addresses that are delivered through YahooGroups.com. I've
been "whitelisting" each one I find but wonder if there is a specific
a
No disagreement there but it wasn't on the net. It housed a MySQL DB
used by some front-end applications from within the DMZ. Secure is
sometimes relative to the task at hand.
One of the reasons for the restart was because it was upgraded...
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicolas [mailt
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 01:37:57PM -0500, David Brodbeck wrote:
> I reboot Linux servers when I need to upgrade the kernel, upgrade the
> BIOS, or have a startup script change that needs to be tested. Don't
> overlook that last one, it's less inconvenient to reboot right away and
> find out if
Dan Barker wrote:
What's the thinking for Linux? I'm just running a couple daemons in support
of my Wireless Network subscription services (they diddle the firewall based
on Credit Card income) and the firewall.
I reboot Linux servers when I need to upgrade the kernel, upgrade the
BIOS, or have
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 09:26:19AM -0800, Gary W. Smith wrote:
> My RH6.1 box had about 800 days on it I think until we upgrade it a
> couple months. My Windows domain controller has almost 9 months on it
> until I did the full set of service packs.
>
> You only really need to reboot if you hav
Ron McKeating wrote:
Hmmm, but I have my own domain, and I want all my email to come from my
domain, my isp will not route email from my domain (ntl) through their
mail servers, they want my to use my [EMAIL PROTECTED] account.
One option, if you can't get a proper static IP, is to use a third-part
My RH6.1 box had about 800 days on it I think until we upgrade it a
couple months. My Windows domain controller has almost 9 months on it
until I did the full set of service packs.
You only really need to reboot if you have applications that are poorly
writing and leak memory.
Michele is rig
I read somewhere that it is wise to reboot when you install or modify services
that start upon boot. This way, if anything doesn't start right, you'll have a
pretty good indication that it's due to whatever you were working on, and you'll
know about it while the details are still fresh in your mind
Would there happen to be a SARE ruleset to catch this horrible influx of
Rolex spam?
--JM
We only reboot:
- when we absolutely have to ie. Machine is not behaving properly or has to
be physically moved
- when there is a kernel upgrade (same as above)
If the machine is behaving and you don't need to patch/upgrade the kernel
why reboot it?
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Internet Solution
Excuse the bandwidth, but someone on this list is going to know. I've always
tried to reboot windoze boxes at least monthly. Back in "the day", I'd
reboot IBM mainframes each Standard/Daylight Savings transition, just
because I had to be on-site on a Sunday anyhow. No real reason.
What's the think
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 04:18:16PM +, Ron McKeating wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 15:54, Jim Maul wrote:
> > Chris wrote:
> > > I was messing around with fetchmail yesterday seeing if I could get it
> > > to
> > > work for the first time. After playing with it for a few hours and
> > > se
All,
I understand this may be the wrong place to ask a perl question, but I have
a question that Google nor any list I can find will answer... trying to
install perl module Net::Ident, I get make test errors as follows. I'd
really appreciate any tips. I've no idea why this is happening (Fedor
Hi Dan
Thanks for checking
Well, I'm running quite a large set of rules (pretty much everything
that's lying around ;) ), but the problem with the very long lines seems
to be pre3 specific then
another good reason to upgrade... As soon as I find the time to test it
on the other system
T
Well, that wasn't it.
On my test system, it lost about 10 seconds firing up SPAMD, and ran quickly
after that (I guess I could run it a second time - Yes, that's the ticket).
I'm using mostly default 3.0.1 rules.
041127 074235: Q:bigspam1; Delta T: 15,593 ms (783); In X-Spam-Status:
Yes, score=
On Friday 26 November 2004 06:05, Marcus Schopen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on debian/woody sa-stats.pl ends with following errors:
>
> Error in option spec: "top|T:25"
> Error in option spec: "SCALAR(0x84ff7f4)"
>
> The getopt libs might be to old on woody. Are there any other programms to
> get some ni
Hi All,
After talking with Patrick Bores, the original programmer, about WebUserPrefs,
I have put together a new release with SA 3.x compatible subject line
rewriting. I have attached the new version as I don't have web space yet.
Pending approval of SourceForge, I'll be posting the file to
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Why? That way I can strongly identify users I know would not spam..
Users of PGP are not the same set of people getting their mail
occasionally flagged as false positives.
There have also been cases of spammers grabbing PGP signatures and
slapping them on the end of t
27 matches
Mail list logo
