Hi Dan
Thanks for checking
Well, I'm running quite a large set of rules (pretty much everything that's lying around ;) ), but the problem with the very long lines seems to be pre3 specific then....
another good reason to upgrade... As soon as I find the time to test it on the other system....
Thanks for your time
Matt
Dan Barker wrote:
Well, that wasn't it.
On my test system, it lost about 10 seconds firing up SPAMD, and ran quickly after that (I guess I could run it a second time - Yes, that's the ticket). I'm using mostly default 3.0.1 rules.
041127 074235: Q:bigspam1; Delta T: 15,593 ms (783); In X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48,DIET_1, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,HTML_40_50,HTML_COMMENT_SHORT,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,HTML_TITLE_UNTITLED,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MSGID_OUTLOOK_INVALID,MSGID_SPAM_ZEROES,RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY, STOCK_ALERT autolearn=no version=3.0.1
Log entry after SPAMD already running.
041127 074741: Q:bigspam1; Delta T: 953 ms (783); In X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48,DIET_1, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,HTML_40_50,HTML_COMMENT_SHORT,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,HTML_TITLE_UNTITLED,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MSGID_OUTLOOK_INVALID,MSGID_SPAM_ZEROES,RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY, STOCK_ALERT autolearn=no version=3.0.1
Sub-second. Now THAT's performance.
Looks like a very different set of rules. The body raw rules can be quite "expensive" but I'm not sure what (if any) raw body rules are in 3.0.1 by default.
Dan
-----Original Message----- From: Matthias Keller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 7:37 AM To: Dan Barker Subject: Re: FW: TIMING [total 846599 ms] ???
Hi Dan
Here you are
Matt
Dan Barker wrote:
Zip it up and send it over. I'll run it through 3.0.1.
Dan
-----Original Message----- From: Matthias Keller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 4:06 PM To: users@SpamAssassin.apache.org Subject: Re: TIMING [total 846599 ms] ???
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
debug: running raw-body-text per-line regexp tests; score so far=8.789 There it stays for ages, using 100% cpu
Any known problem? I'd be happy to provide the mail in question to anyone interested.
Time for you to upgrade. If the problem still exists in 3.0.1, please let us know. :) Dallas
Yeah I know, but since I need to update amavis aswell for that I'm a bit cautious and will first have to test the whole setup on a test machine, which at the moment I just dont have time for....
But if you want I can send you the msg so that you can test it on 301 if you're interested....
Matt
