Andrew Ott said:
>
> Amavisd-new launches spamassasin in perl form rather then use spamd.
This is true, but amavisd does load the perl spamassassin code into memory
once at startup, so it's just as fast as spamd.
> The fedora core machines running amavisd-new are both 2.4 dual xeons with
> 4gb
Amavisd-new launches spamassasin in perl form rather then use spamd.
The fedora core machines running amavisd-new are both 2.4 dual xeons with
4gb of memory
Amavisd-new virus scanning and spam scanning with spamassasin is using about
18% cpu, and for everything we have about 1.8gb of memory in us
On Thursday 21 October 2004 13:59, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes
happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would
like something that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server
would require pop, imap, and webmai
Communigate Pro from Stalker software has treated my real well over the last 3
years.
-joe
On Thursday 21 October 2004 13:59, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes
> happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would
> like somet
> We are using 2 fedora core 2 machines running dual sendmail with
> amavisd-new, spamassassin 3.0, clamav, delivered to a database using dbmail,
> all with individual user preferences. For frontend machines. And 2 fedora
> core 2 machines running sendmail, dbmail-imapd and dbmail-pop3d, along wi
We are using 2 fedora core 2 machines running dual sendmail with
amavisd-new, spamassassin 3.0, clamav, delivered to a database using dbmail,
all with individual user preferences. For frontend machines. And 2 fedora
core 2 machines running sendmail, dbmail-imapd and dbmail-pop3d, along with
the ho
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 05:08:39PM -0400, Upwood, Jim wrote:
> Has anyone seen this? What is the file limit?
>
> Oct 21 17:04:29 antispam spamd[8073]: dcc: check failed: util: cannot
> fork: Too many open files at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 1037,
> line 310
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 05:08:39PM -0400, Upwood, Jim wrote:
> Has anyone seen this? What is the file limit?
>
> Oct 21 17:04:29 antispam spamd[8073]: dcc: check failed: util: cannot
> fork: Too many open files at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 1037,
> line 310
Has anyone seen this? What is the file limit?
Oct 21 17:04:29 antispam spamd[8073]: dcc: check failed: util: cannot
fork: Too many open files at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 1037,
line 310
Thanks,
Jim Upwood
System Administrator
Bond, Schoeneck, and King
Syracu
Quoting Jeffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes
> happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would
> like something that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server
> would require pop, imap, and webmail. If so
Please don't hijack threads.
You break the list archives and screw up the threading in mail clients
that support threading. You did this by replying to an unrelated post,
removing the entire message body, changing the subject and typing your
new post. Please use the 'new' function of your MUA.
P.S.
FWIW, Suse linux pro 9.1 is a great starting point for me, as it ships
with postfix, spamassassin, amavisd, and clamav, and saslauth, and working
well together - I merely substituted dovecot as the imap/pop3 server,
updated spamassassin to 3.0 and added maia mailguard for quarantine
management. Mai
Jeffrey Lee writes:
>
> The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes
> happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would
> like something that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server
> would require pop, imap, and webmail. If someone could sugg
We use XMail (www.xmailserver.com).
- Open-source
- +ACo-nix and Windows versions
You can add IMAP via Courier-IMAP -- although next release will have it built
in.
You can add webmail via any interface that talks via mailfolders, IMAP, or POP3.
You can remotely admin it.
Supports any applicati
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >At 04:38 PM 10/20/2004 -0700, .rp wrote:
> >
> >>we are using Version 1.18 and have come across the problem of when
> >>people send us comma delimited files as part of the email
> >instead of as an
> >>attachment. Is there
Jeffrey Lee wrote:
The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes
happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would
like something that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server
would require pop, imap, and webmail. If someone could suggest other
The target environment (software and hardware) would help as well.
Under RedHat 9, RHEL3 and Fedora we use postfix, SA, Vexira A/V
(commercial but works well) and uw-imap. Configuration was fairly
simple.
Gary Wayne Smith
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
* Jeffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes
> happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would
> like something that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server
> would require pop, imap, and webmail. If someon
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Wolfgang Friebel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I observed with miltrassassin (Revision: 1.14 Date: 2003/05/28 18:43:47)
> from check_local.5.6.tar.gz formerly available at
> http://www.digitalanswers.org/check_local/check_local.5.6.tar.gz
> the following bug:
>
> Miltrassassin generates a
The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes
happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would
like something that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server
would require pop, imap, and webmail. If someone could suggest other
solutions please do.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Munday writes:
> Does anyone have any knowledge on how the development of hascash is going?
> I've been searching around this afternoon and can find only a little
> information (2 pages of Google search results) out there. Particularly
> looking
Thanks for straightening me out. The RFC's are certainly clear on this. I
was just being dense. I've run that header into IMail from outside (without
the folding) and all is well. I'll report the bug to the globalpay.com
postmaster.
Thanks again.
Dan
Subject: RE: What's wrong with this Message-
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 8:45 PM
>To: .rp; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: chickenpox rule - ignoring extremely high scores
>
>
>At 04:38 PM 10/20/2004 -0700, .rp wrote:
>
>>we are using Version 1.18 a
At 12:33 PM 10/21/2004, Dan Barker wrote:
09 Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 ay.com>
11 X-MS-Has-Attach:
12 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
13 Thread-Topic: 4 Candles - A Beautiful Message
14 Thread-Index: AcS3BWlt5dySvEvTSWeuRuweMuzolAAY/hRA
15 From:
16 To:
17 and up ...
Newlines with a number (nnS
Does anyone have any knowledge on how the development of hascash is going?
I've been searching around this afternoon and can find only a little
information (2 pages of Google search results) out there. Particularly
looking to see if any plugins are available (or will be) for outlook clients
(the h
Well, I've just rolled out SA to my IMail server (Windoze, gaaagh!) and my
hook to pass to SA also copies the input to a flat file. I can
rerun/edit/inspect anything that my nightly "kill -3days" hasn't yet hit.
Nice feature for this sort of thing. Maybe I'll keep it.
The input file begins:
00 Re
Developement work like developing new rules?
Anyway...we're up and running without spamassassin-tools. I need to get on
CPAN and
pull a couple modules that it claims to need before I can install it.
Thank you so much for your help.
Now I am off to learn about storing user specific rules...and
At 11:54 AM 10/21/2004, Gary Manigault wrote:
I have
Spamassasin version 2.63. I have some allowed and denied addresses
setup but it doesn't seem to be working. The spamd process it
running. It doesn't seem to be tagging mail from the denied domain
names. I have been testing this with a telnet
Title: Message
I have Spamassasin
version 2.63. I have some allowed and denied addresses setup but it
doesn't seem to be working. The spamd process it running. It doesn't seem
to be tagging mail from the denied domain names. I have been testing this
with a telnet to my postfix box which i
Here is the rule from 3.0
header __SANE_MSGID MESSAGEID =~ /^<[^<>\\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]<>\\
\t\n\r\x0b\x80-\xff]+>\s*$/m
header __HAS_MSGID MESSAGEID =~ /\S/
header __MSGID_COMMENT MESSAGEID =~ /\(.*\)/m
meta INVALID_MSGID __HAS_MSGID && !(__SANE_MSGID || __MSGID_COMMENT)
describe INVALID_MSGID
Quoting Michael Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:08:53PM +0100, Ronan wrote:
> > Am i right in saying that if you do nothing after installing 3.0
> > (leave everything default) then the SURIBLs arent enabled.
>
> I believe that SURIBLs are enabled by default, but I guess we
>>From procmail, it calls spamc which connects to spamd.
Any other thing you need?
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 12:28, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 11:57 AM 10/21/2004 -0300, Lior Marantenboim wrote:
> >Hi everyone again
> >
> >Right now I have a site wide configuration with a site wide whitelist. I
> >was
Ok...that was easy. Never built from an RPM source before. Not bad.
I figured out that I needed to then find the generated RPM files...and install
those.
Woohoo! SA 3.0.0 ...here I come
Thanks again,
Kevin
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kevin Morwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sen
At 11:57 AM 10/21/2004 -0300, Lior Marantenboim wrote:
Hi everyone again
Right now I have a site wide configuration with a site wide whitelist. I
was wondering if, apart from this config, some users could have their
own config and use their own whitelists.
Depends on how your site wide is set up.
At 09:15 AM 10/21/2004 -0400, you wrote:
I can't for the life of me see anything wrong with:
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It looks to me like 2822 sez:
First, I'm assuming that line break before the < is an artifact of your
mail client, and isn't in the real message. (This is one reason why
co
my problem is that SA is running on the mailhubs while all the mailboxes
are on the mail servers. is there a flag to pass to sa-learn that will
read remote imap folders or do i just have to copy them onto a dir on
the 'local' machine!?
ronan
Jeffrey Lee wrote:
You have to start bayes with a min
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:08:53PM +0100, Ronan wrote:
> Am i right in saying that if you do nothing after installing 3.0
> (leave everything default) then the SURIBLs arent enabled.
I believe that SURIBLs are enabled by default, but I guess we are both
too lazy to check.
> if you dont manually f
> On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 10:41 -0400, Keith Hackworth wrote:
>> I figured this out. In case someone else sees this problem, here's the
>> solution:
>>
>> The problem stemmed from DB_File. I tried to recompile DB_File and it
>> failed during testing. After a little goofing around, I figured out I
Am i right in saying that if you do nothing after installing 3.0 (leave
everything default) then the SURIBLs arent enabled.
if you dont manually feed anything into your bayes db - it doesnt do
anything fancy for you? because for every message flagged as spam in
syslog atm it has the flag 'autol
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 5:48 am, Anthony Edwards wrote:
> Here's my plan spelled out cleanly, but not yet coded:
> fetchmail -> maildrop -> SA -> maildir
Pretty simple. I am running the same setup.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat .fetchmailrc
> poll pop3.nildram.co.uk proto pop3 user "topflite"
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 10:41 -0400, Keith Hackworth wrote:
> I figured this out. In case someone else sees this problem, here's the
> solution:
>
> The problem stemmed from DB_File. I tried to recompile DB_File and it
> failed during testing. After a little goofing around, I figured out I
> need
I figured this out. In case someone else sees this problem, here's the
solution:
The problem stemmed from DB_File. I tried to recompile DB_File and it
failed during testing. After a little goofing around, I figured out I
needed to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH during runtime. This really sucks because
t
Hi everyone again
Right now I have a site wide configuration with a site wide whitelist. I
was wondering if, apart from this config, some users could have their
own config and use their own whitelists.
So those who don't have this config file will use the default one, and
those who do, use theirs
> From: "Jim Maul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions wrote:
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >
>> >>Add
>> >>
>> >>FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.00
>> >>
>> >>in your local.cf file
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks - exactly what I needed :)
>> >
>> > /me kicks himself
>> >
>> > I rea
I just upgraded sa from 2.64 to 3.0 via the .tar file from the spamassassin
site.
I've cleaned up the world, but get the following in my headers:
X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
autolearn=unavailable version=3.0.0
autolearn was working before. What do I ne
Kevin Morwood wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am sure this issue has come up before. I have seen mention of it
> but no resolution.
>
> I am trying to build/install SA 3.0.0. I have been using SA
> since 2.1 or something really old. The most recent I have
> installed (running currently) is 2.63. I hav
Hello,
I am sure this issue has come up before. I have seen mention of it but no
resolution.
I am trying to build/install SA 3.0.0. I have been using SA since 2.1 or
something
really old. The most recent I have installed (running currently) is 2.63. I
have
been installing these via RPMs.
SpamAssassin (default settings except a few score's) 3.0.0 sez:
1.1 INVALID_MSGID Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC 2822
I can't for the life of me see anything wrong with:
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It looks to me like 2822 sez:
message-id= "Message-ID:" msg-id CRLF
I upgraded the last of our email servers last night to 3.0.0. I had
everything working for a while, but I wanted to see how bayes was doing.
I did a sa-learn --sync when I upgraded and I was able to do sa-learn
--dump all and see a bunch of md5(?) hashes with some statistics when I
ran sa-learn -
I recieved an email this morning that I get every morning but today it
was missing the entire body past the headers. Notice though that SA'
report on it leads one to believe it had analyzed the email at some
point. I run SA through procmail so I have two places to look and what
makes this worse
Hi,
I observed with miltrassassin (Revision: 1.14 Date: 2003/05/28 18:43:47)
from check_local.5.6.tar.gz formerly available at
http://www.digitalanswers.org/check_local/check_local.5.6.tar.gz
the following bug:
Miltrassassin generates a Received: header for the HELO part of the SMTP
protocol. The
Hi,
I currently run spamassassin through a sendmail milter, which will scan
each mail only once, no matter how many recipients there are,
I would like to change the behavior, to make spamd scan each mail once
for each recipient, is this possible when using system-wide config ? (no
local users o
I run three mailhubs which scan for spam / virus on all incoming and
(external) outgoing mail for a single domain. Both virus and spam are
done locally on each machine, and so therefore have to be updated /
maintained manually on each. After jsut recently upgrading spam 3.0 on
all 3 hubs and no
I run three mailhubs which scan for spam / virus on all incoming and
(external) outgoing mail for a single domain. Both virus and spam are
done locally on each machine, and so therefore have to be updated /
maintained manually on each. After jsut recently upgrading spam 3.0 on
all 3 hubs and no
Hi,
I sent one mail one week ago asking for collaboration in order to do some
research on distributions of ham and spam mail among users on the Web. In
order to increase the probability that people trust on what I am saying, I
uploaded a page on the web server of my research institution. The p
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 5:48 am, Anthony Edwards wrote:
Here's my plan spelled out cleanly, but not yet coded:
> > fetchmail -> maildrop -> SA -> maildir
>
> Ditto for my personal mail setup, and it works a treat.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat .forward
>
> | /usr/local/bin/maildrop
I am not sur
Hooray! Just when I was thinking about how to start another thread asking the
same
question... I am pleased that this thread can continue. :)
Read below...
> > Thanks so much. Unfortunately, I don't see much change in my CPU usage by
> spamd. I am
> > at a loss, as I've spent almost an enti
At 04:38 PM 10/20/2004 -0700, .rp wrote:
we are using Version 1.18 and have come across the problem of when
people send us comma delimited files as part of the email instead of as an
attachment. Is there a way to tell spamassassin (or chickenpox) that if the
score gets above 15 to ignore this messa
58 matches
Mail list logo
