*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0 when I use whitelist_from_rcvd with domain
names that reverse to only one possible domain it works just as it
should. When the domain name is one that has multiple possibilities
that it can reve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ray writes:
> I see this is already in bugzilla. Should we just depreciate that rule for
> now? It is really screwing up my scores.
As the bz bug says -- it's a symptom as much as anything else. so adding
support for the Received header format it
I see this is already in bugzilla. Should we just depreciate that rule for
now? It is really screwing up my scores.
Ray Dzek
Network Operations Supervisor
Specialized Bicycle Components
PH: 408-782-5420
FX: 408-782-5421
David Brodbeck wrote:
Kelson wrote:
Mail sent from <> to a few addresses that we never use for outgoing
mail is rejected with an "Invalid bounce" explanation. (Don't do this
with postmaster or abuse, or you'll probably end up listed on
RFC-ignorant.)
AFAIK you won't unless someone decides to rep
Kelson wrote:
Mail sent from <> to a few addresses that we never use for outgoing
mail is rejected with an "Invalid bounce" explanation. (Don't do this
with postmaster or abuse, or you'll probably end up listed on
RFC-ignorant.)
AFAIK you won't unless someone decides to report you. RFC-ignorant
David Brodbeck wrote:
You may want to restrict outside addresses from sending to those
accounts...well, at least the notspam one. It's occurred to me, after getting
a bunch of spam to web-scraped email addresses, that if I published the spam@
address in hidden text on our website the filter might
I can't recall if this article from The Register got mentioned here or not:
Click here to become infected
By John Leyden
Published Wednesday 22nd September 2004 09:15 GMT
Users should be wary of pressing the 'click here to remove' link on spam
messages because it serves to confirm to spammers tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not sure -- as far as I can see MIMEDefang is a C program
and as such can use the XS apis to create a perl interpreter
object from C, which seems to be what the embedded perl is.
We're pure-perl, and as such it shouldn't help us at all ;)
- --j.
Hi,
I am new to the list. I installed SA 3.0.0 today, and it works fine. At
the moment I only have one question concerning the temp file. In default
it is written to the /tmp directory with rights 666. It is quite
dangerous, anyone can modify it! How to change the rights to 600
automatically? In m
At 05:27 PM 9/23/2004, Ray wrote:
Hi all,
Trying to install from CPAN and get the following message on make test.
t/prefs_include.Not found: qp-encoded-desc = Invalid Date:
header =ae =af =b0 foo
# Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 530
t/prefs_include.FAILED test 1
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 02:21:43PM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
> I got only clean messages with -1.1
> and in /var/log/messages from spamd:
> Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm line 184.
> Use of
Hi all,
Trying to install from CPAN and get the following message on make test.
t/prefs_include.Not found: qp-encoded-desc = Invalid Date:
header =ae =af =b0 foo
# Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 530
t/prefs_include.FAILED test 1
Failed 1/2 tests, 50.00%
Following our upgrade to SA 3.0 today we experienced a very odd problem. When
checking messages with spamc, spamd would report the status to syslog (putting
it into my mail log files) but it would *not* add X-Spam headers, nor would it
modify the subject line as my rules file directed it to. I
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 11:27:25AM -0400, Phil Thompson wrote:
> Command output: Can't locate
> auto/Mail/Audit/MailInternet/extract_mes.al in @INC (@INC contains:
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.3
> etc etc etc
>
> Has anyone seen this error? Know how to fix it?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:35:39AM -0400, Rob Kudyba wrote:
> Here is the debug output...has this been reported?
not an SA issue.
> /etc/mail/spamassassin root# /usr/bin/spamassassin --lint -D
> debug: config: read file //etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_html.cf
> debug: config: read file //etc/mail
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:47:34PM -0500, jenni baier wrote:
> Does anyone have 3.0 in RPM form? I can't find any links to RPM versions
> on the site...
Grab the tar ball, run "rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.0.tar.gz", it'll
build for you. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
A writer thinks
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, jenni baier wrote:
> Does anyone have 3.0 in RPM form? I can't find any links to RPM versions
> on the site...
there is one in their development directory.
I had to remove rewrite_subject and subject_tag from
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf though.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Buckmaster wrote:
| I have set up a spam/virus filtering gateway using the very popular
| combination of ClamAV+Spamassassin+Amavisd-new+Postfix. As its still
| in development, I'd like to do a slow roll-out to the users and have
| them help train
Could you use the embedded perl?
Mimedefang uses that for better memory sharing between processes, appears
to work on most platforms running 5.6 or later of perl.
Justin Mason said:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Sounds like we need to figure out how to get more of our stuff
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 11:05:30AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> Kenneth Porter writes:
> > Every time I see a spam story on SlashDot I think how the SlashDot
> > effect could be used for good by getting everyone to visit the
> > spammer's site and take it to its knees, while driving up the
> > spa
File this under both:
- too late
- my own damn fault
but those of us who just do:
$cpan
cpan> install Mail::SpamAssassin
never get to *see* the UPGRADE file
I'm just saying it would have been nice if a question popped up under cpan's
installation that asked "are you using Mail::Audit to fil
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:51:36 -0500, Gary Buckmaster wrote
> considered setting up spam@ and notspam@ accounts on the gateway
> itself, and having local users send appropriate samples to these
> accounts, then running sa-learn against these. Does this approach
> make a great deal of sense? Has an
At 02:51 PM 9/23/2004, Gary Buckmaster wrote:
To this end, I've
considered setting up spam@ and notspam@ accounts on the gateway
itself, and having local users send appropriate samples to these
accounts, then running sa-learn against these. Does this approach
make a great deal of sense?
Only if y
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:29:49 -0400 (EDT), Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote
> While I'm thinking about this, let me offer up a suggestion...
>
> For those of us that prefer user_prefs in text files but because
> SpamAssassin with the preforking is getting much bigger have decided
> we need a separ
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:54:14PM -0500, Sandy S whispered:
> Apparently the lookups timed out. I assume that's something to do with the
> fact that it's checking for tvuu.wneiis-MUNGEDplanet.info instead of just
> wneiis-MUNGEDplanet.info, but I don't know enough about how the URI RBLs
> work t
- Original Message -
From: "Ulysses Cruz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0?
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:10:40PM -0500, Sandy S whispered:
> > Ulysses -
> > Thanks for your advice. I
> Steve Bertrand wrote:
>>>Finally, I would suggest that bombarding their purchasing forms with
>>>valid-looking purchase data, might work better.
>>
>>
>> As someone who deals with the consequences of DoS attacks, I
>> disagree
>> firmly with that approach, however...the above idea seems very
>> e
Hi All,
I have set up a spam/virus filtering gateway using the very popular
combination of ClamAV+Spamassassin+Amavisd-new+Postfix. As its still
in development, I'd like to do a slow roll-out to the users and have
them help train the database against spam. To this end, I've
considered setting up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Phil Thompson writes:
> disclaimer: I posted this to comp.lang.perl.modules (no reply yet), but since
> this list is the FIRST place I looked, I'll send here as well.
>
> Hello,
>
> Until yesterday, I was happily using a combination of Mail::Audit
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Finally, I would suggest that bombarding their purchasing forms with
valid-looking purchase data, might work better.
As someone who deals with the consequences of DoS attacks, I disagree
firmly with that approach, however...the above idea seems very
entertaining and I was LMA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
snowjack writes:
> David Brodbeck wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:26:12 -0700, snowjack wrote
> >>Yeah, and it is true that SpamAssassin uses lots of RAM (20M per
> >>process?) So what, RAM is cheap!
> >
> > If I'm not mistaken, some of that 20M i
users-subscribe -at- spamassassin.apache.org
This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other informat
> Finally, I would suggest that bombarding their purchasing forms with
> valid-looking purchase data, might work better.
As someone who deals with the consequences of DoS attacks, I disagree
firmly with that approach, however...the above idea seems very
entertaining and I was LMAO when I read it..
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:10:40PM -0500, Sandy S whispered:
> Ulysses -
> Thanks for your advice. I'm pretty sure we have all the needed perl
> modules, since 99% of the time the URIBL rules are working just as they're
> supposed to. It's only on those one or two .info domains that they don't
>
Sandy S scribbled on Thursday, September 23, 2004 11:05 AM:
>
> Ken -
> I quoted the missed URI in my original message, and it
> appears that's what
> triggered the URI_RBL rules on yours and Ulysses' systems. (Just not
> on mine!) :-(
>
> I did double-check our domain and it's not listed, but t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shane Metler writes:
> Answering my own question ...
>
> Well I was able to find a BUG report that (at present) says 'body' and
> 'rawbody' debug output has been removed from 3.0.0.
I don't think it was in there in the first place ;) However if I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I need to create a custom rule to imitate the action of whitelist_from_rcvd.
The reason I need to do this is because I have several networks where mail
originates for the same domain before it is received at our internal mail
server.
Originally, I
Does anyone have 3.0 in RPM form? I can't find any links to RPM versions
on the site...
Thanks in advance...
- Original Message -
From: "Ulysses Cruz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0?
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:44:39PM -0500, Sandy S. whispered:
> > Thanks for your response - that's very
David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:26:12 -0700, snowjack wrote
Yeah, and it is true that SpamAssassin uses lots of RAM (20M per
process?) So what, RAM is cheap!
If I'm not mistaken, some of that 20M is actually shared amongst all the
spamd
processes, so it's not as much memory usage as
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Goods" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Sandy S'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: {Spam?} Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0?
> Sandy S scribbled on Thursday, September 23, 2004 8:52 AM:
>
> > I'm in the p
At 01:43 PM 9/23/2004, German Staltari wrote:
Hi, I would like to know why the Bayes rules has so low scores.
Read the FAQ, this explains how most rule scores are assigned, including
bayes:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/HowScoresAreAssigned
Basically, it's the result of a real-world statisti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kenneth Porter writes:
> Every time I see a spam story on SlashDot I think how the SlashDot effect
> could be used for good by getting everyone to visit the spammer's site and
> take it to its knees, while driving up the spammer's bandwidth bill. Ch
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:44:39PM -0500, Sandy S. whispered:
> Thanks for your response - that's very interesting! We're running
> Spamassassin 3.0 on FreeBSD 4.9, using spamd/spamc called via procmail. I
> do have a bunch of custom rulesets, mostly pulled from the SARE site:
> 70_sare_uri.cf, 9
Hi, I would like to know why the Bayes rules has so low scores.
TIA
German
- Original Message -
From: "Ulysses Cruz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0?
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:52:03AM -0500, Sandy S whispered:
> > I'm in the process of upgrading to Spa
Sandy S scribbled on Thursday, September 23, 2004 8:52 AM:
> I'm in the process of upgrading to Spamassassin 3.0 and am
> currently running
> my email through the new version of Spamassassin. I just had
> an email slip
> through that should have been caught by the URIDNSBL lookups - it's
> listed
I suppose this is a "piece of string" question, but I have a box configured
to receive mail using Suse, Postfix, pass it through Spamassassin 3.0 and
then relay it to an internal server.
Spamassassin is always invoked under a "filter" user account, so there is a
single shared bayes d/b.
Setting
Answering my own question ...
Well I was able to find a BUG report that (at present) says 'body' and
'rawbody' debug output has been removed from 3.0.0.
This was bad news ... I really like to see exactly what SA sees. So I
had to add a little code to the package
Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus,
Greetings
all!
I have just put my
Postfix/Spamassassin/Solaris9 server into production an hour ago, and I am
loving the results. I have one issue where SpamAssassin is not modifying
my subject line. This is important because rules on the client detect the
modification to put the spam of
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 07:56, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 09:36 AM 9/23/2004, Jerry Gaiser wrote:
> >Ok, I know I'm probably missing something, but since upgrading to 3.0
> >RBL tests don't seem to being executed.
> >
> >I use nothing but Bayes and RBL and have had good results through the
> >2.6x seri
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:52:03AM -0500, Sandy S whispered:
> I'm in the process of upgrading to Spamassassin 3.0 and am currently running
> my email through the new version of Spamassassin. I just had an email slip
> through that should have been caught by the URIDNSBL lookups - it's listed
> in
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:40:16 -0400
Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I keep getting a timeout going to www.spamassassin.org. And the
> spamassassin.apache.org site as well.
>
> Anyone else?
>
> Chris Santerre
Maybe it's *you* having a problem?
--
Raquel
===
I just want to mention that since using SA 3 my average spam score went up
from 20 to 35 with some spam scoring over 80!
Way cool - well done guys. Check out this one... :)
Content analysis details: (87.6 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---
Hello all...
I figure I've asked enough questions of this list that it's about time I
gave something back... You may not want it,but here it is anyway :)
I've written a bash script that takes will run sa-learn against the
administrator specified False-Postive and False-Negative folders.
Run this
--On Thursday, September 23, 2004 10:31 AM -0400 Chris Santerre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Reisstinnng urge to crack joke..feeling rising..so .so
difficult to not.arghhh.p.. *pop*
I think there's a pill for that. And even if there's not, someone should
soo
I'm in the process of upgrading to Spamassassin 3.0 and am currently running
my email through the new version of Spamassassin. I just had an email slip
through that should have been caught by the URIDNSBL lookups - it's listed
in all of the URI blacklists.
Here's a snippet from my debug output on
>-Original Message-
>From: Martin Huber
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:49 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: timeout www.spamassasin.org ?
>
>
>Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>> I keep getting a timeout going to www.spamassassin.org. And the
>>
Dave Stern - Former Rocket Scientist wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>> I keep getting a timeout going to www.spamassassin.org. And the
>> spamassassin.apache.org site as well.
>>
>> Anyone else?
>
> Keep trying. You'll get in eventually. SA is a victim of its own
> success
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 10:57, Chris Santerre wrote:
> Is anyone else having trouble getting to the SA website?
Not here, Chris. Typing www.spamassassin.org takes me to
spamassassin.apache.org quickly.
Alex
Chris Santerre wrote:
I keep getting a timeout going to www.spamassassin.org. And the
spamassassin.apache.org site as well.
Anyone else?
It gave me timeouts as well a few minutes ago, but now it seems to work
again. Looks like they redesigned the page.
--
Martin
--
The From: and Reply-To: addre
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
On a related note, is anyone seeing the main spamassassin site down now?
-Dan
List Whore
--
"One...plus two...plus one...plus one."
-Tim Curry, Clue
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: La
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
I keep getting a timeout going to www.spamassassin.org. And the
spamassassin.apache.org site as well.
Anyone else?
Keep trying. You'll get in eventually. SA is a victim of its own success
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- generated by /dev/dave -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/23/2004
10:40:16 AM:
> I keep getting a timeout going to www.spamassassin.org. And the
> spamassassin.apache.org site as well.
>
> Anyone else?
>
> Chris Santerre
> System Admin and SARE Ninja
> http://www.rulesemporium.com
> http://www.surbl.org
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 10:40 AM
> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: timeout www.spamassasin.org ?
>
>
> I keep getting a timeout going to www.spamassassin.org. And
> the spamassassin.apache.org s
At 11:20 AM 9/23/2004, Andy Norris wrote:
I am adding those listings on the new server to the file
/usr/share/spamassassin/60_whitelist.cf.
I forgot a few:
4) do not edit files in /usr/share/spamassassin unless you REALLY know what
you are doing. These files are considered to be a part of spamass
At 11:20 AM 9/23/2004, Andy Norris wrote:
We're migrating from one server to another. Both now have the same
versions of SpamAssassin (2.64) and MailScanner running.
We had all our whitelisting on the old server going on in
/etc/MailScanner/rules/spam.whitelist.rules.
Those listed in that file
There's some debate on the MIMEDefang list on a performance issue and I wanted
to get the SpamAssassin users' take on this.
Is there any potential performance benefit to have MIMEDefang call out to spamd
using spamc?
Suppose I'm running MIMEDefang and SpamAssassin on a relay server. I might
a
>-Original Message-
>From: Dan Mahoney, System Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:06 PM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: 'Jim Maul'; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SlashDotting spammers
>
>
>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>On a relate
I keep getting a timeout going to www.spamassassin.org. And the
spamassassin.apache.org site as well.
Anyone else?
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but th
Is anyone else having trouble getting to the SA website?
--chris
2) I seem to notice that spamd is the thing that creates the user files,
rather than spamc -- if I still wanted these config files generated, for
backwards compatibility (my plan is I would date-parse them on a cronjob
and insert any modified ones into the SQL db with a setuid perl script),
can a s
Title: Message
Hi
there,
I have been trying
to find a debug option to output the 'body' and 'rawbody' text used when
SpamAssassin does it's RegEx tests.
There was a clever
RegEx rule that worked in SA 2.6.X
body PRINTBODY /(^.*$)(?{ print
"Body: $1\n" })/is
But this kind of
ru
disclaimer: I posted this to comp.lang.perl.modules (no reply yet), but since
this list is the FIRST place I looked, I'll send here as well.
Hello,
Until yesterday, I was happily using a combination of Mail::Audit and
Mail::SpamAssassin to filter my mail. Yesterday I upgraded
SpamAssassin to ve
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 11:17:31AM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> 1) Is there a supported way of migrating all the existing bayes databases
> and user configs into SQL? I understand the userconfig format is fairly
> straightforward, but I have no idea about the bayes system.
>
sql/R
While I'm thinking about this, let me offer up a suggestion...
For those of us that prefer user_prefs in text files but because
SpamAssassin with the preforking is getting much bigger have decided we
need a separate box, does it make sense to run a "spamd-helper" on the
machine with the home dir
We're migrating from one server to another. Both now have the same versions
of SpamAssassin (2.64) and MailScanner running.
We had all our whitelisting on the old server going on in
/etc/MailScanner/rules/spam.whitelist.rules.
Those listed in that file on our new server are not being recognized
Hey all...
My users have previously used the normal text-based config files, however
due to the load involved with SA-3, I am thinking of forking off a new box
to do my scanning (400 domains or so -- it's a pain).
The obvious problem is the concept of user configs -- unless I were to
mount my e
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:03:27AM -0500, Michael Parker wrote:
> See tool/check_whitelist in the 3.0.0 tarball.
Opps, tools/check_whitelist
Michael
See tool/check_whitelist in the 3.0.0 tarball.
Michael
On Sep 22, 2004, at 7:15 PM, Ken Versteeg wrote:
How will these changes affect the way the functions are called from
amavisd-new? Has anyone successfully upgraded SpamAssassin to 3.0?
Is my
current version of Amavisd-new sufficient?
make sure you have version of amavisd-new that understands SA
At 09:36 AM 9/23/2004, Jerry Gaiser wrote:
Ok, I know I'm probably missing something, but since upgrading to 3.0
RBL tests don't seem to being executed.
I use nothing but Bayes and RBL and have had good results through the
2.6x series, but no reports since the upgrade.
I have made to changes to loc
Jeff Koch wrote:
> Our auto-whitelist file on our server has grown to 700MB. Is there a
> procedure for pruning it? It seems to be growing indefinitely.
There's no formal procedure I know of, but I found a similar issue (in
my case, per-user AWL files were growing large enough to seriously warp
th
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:21:24 -0400
Jim Maul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:11:39 -0700
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Kenneth Porter wrote:
> >> > Every time I see a spam story on SlashDot I think how the
> >> > SlashDot
>-Original Message-
>From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 10:21 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SlashDotting spammers
>
>
>Quoting Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:11:39 -0700
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Quoting Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:11:39 -0700
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> Every time I see a spam story on SlashDot I think how the
> SlashDot effect could be used for good by getting everyone to
> visit the spammer's site and take it to its knee
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:26:12 -0700, snowjack wrote
> Yeah, and it is true that SpamAssassin uses lots of RAM (20M per
> process?) So what, RAM is cheap!
If I'm not mistaken, some of that 20M is actually shared amongst all the spamd
processes, so it's not as much memory usage as you'd think. Five
Matt Mansfield wrote:
Hi guys
SA3 is working great for me - I've only had one false negative since
installing and it's caught over 170 spam messages so far on my account.
But I noticed that memory usage has been a lot more since installing it, see
http://matt.gresleyrovers.com/pictures/mem-sa3.png
On Thursday, September 23, 2004, 6:42:21 AM, Raquel Rice wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:11:39 -0700
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> IMO the best way to combat spam is not to buy the advertised
>> product.
> That seems like a no-brainer. What do I need a penis extender for?
I'm not touching th
Hi guys
SA3 is working great for me - I've only had one false negative since
installing and it's caught over 170 spam messages so far on my account.
But I noticed that memory usage has been a lot more since installing it, see
http://matt.gresleyrovers.com/pictures/mem-sa3.png
I'm only using the
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:11:39 -0700
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kenneth Porter wrote:
> > Every time I see a spam story on SlashDot I think how the
> > SlashDot effect could be used for good by getting everyone to
> > visit the spammer's site and take it to its knees, while driving
> > up the spam
Here is the debug output...has this been reported?
/etc/mail/spamassassin root# /usr/bin/spamassassin --lint -D
debug: SpamAssassin version 3.0.0
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: running in taint mode? yes
debug: Running in taint mode, removing unsafe env vars, and resetting PATH
debug: PATH inclu
Ok, I know I'm probably missing something, but since upgrading to 3.0
RBL tests don't seem to being executed.
I use nothing but Bayes and RBL and have had good results through the
2.6x series, but no reports since the upgrade.
I have made to changes to local.cf and, yes, I have dug through the
wi
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:51:54PM +0100, Anthony Edwards wrote:
> I have also been unable to persuade spamd to add spamassassin headers,
> as per my posting of last night to the list. Running spamassassin, in
> contrast, seems to work properly (which seems to rule out it being a
> local configur
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 02:21:43PM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
> hi,
> I got only clean messages with -1.1
> and in /var/log/messages from spamd:
> Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm line 184.
> U
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:01:11PM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
> Hi,
> after installing over CPAN I got:
> shodan:~ # sa-learn --sync
>
> bayes: bayes db version 2 is not able to be used, aborting!
> at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm line
> 160.
>
> What to
hi,
I got only clean messages with -1.1
and in /var/log/messages from spamd:
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm line 184.
Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Mike Loiterman wrote:
I periodically get these errors in my log and when I do the messages are not
scanned.
What's going on and how do I stop it?
This isn't an SA issue. It has to do with how your MTA deals with your
LDA (probably procmail)
Make sure that the LDA doesn't genera
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 06:01, Thomas Richter wrote:
> bayes: bayes db version 2 is not able to be used, aborting!
> at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm line
> 160.
>
> What to do?
Be patient and do not cancel the process?
I got the same message and saw that a c
Hi,
after installing over CPAN I got:
shodan:~ # sa-learn --sync
bayes: bayes db version 2 is not able to be used, aborting!
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm line 160.
What to do?
wkr Thomas Richter
--
dss1://49.431.801306 Wot're we going to do tonigh
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
