On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 02:21:43PM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
> hi,
> I got only clean messages with -1.1
> and in /var/log/messages from spamd:
>   Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at 
>     /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm line 184. 
>   Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at 
>     /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 
> 875. 
I am getting similar results in testing:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/software/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.0> spamc < 
sample-nonspam.txt 
> nonspam.out
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/software/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.0> spamc < sample-spam.txt 
> spam.out

ultra:/var/log # tail -n 200 mail.info
[...]
Sep 23 12:07:28 ultra spamd[7939]: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for anthony:500. 
Sep 23 12:07:29 ultra spamd[7939]: Use of uninitialized value in
concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm line
184. 
Sep 23 12:07:29 ultra spamd[7939]: Use of uninitialized value in pattern
match (m//) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line
875. 
Sep 23 12:07:29 ultra spamd[7939]: clean message (-2.6/5.0) for
anthony:500 in 1.0 seconds, 6494 bytes. 
Sep 23 12:07:45 ultra spamd[7935]: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1]
at port 1485 
Sep 23 12:07:45 ultra spamd[7943]: info: setuid to anthony succeeded 
Sep 23 12:07:45 ultra spamd[7943]: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for anthony:500. 
Sep 23 12:07:45 ultra spamd[7943]: Use of uninitialized value in
concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm line
184. 
Sep 23 12:07:45 ultra spamd[7943]: Use of uninitialized value in pattern
match (m//) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line
875. 
Sep 23 12:07:45 ultra spamd[7943]: clean message (-4.5/5.0) for
anthony:500 in 0.4 seconds, 799 bytes. 

I have also been unable to persuade spamd to add spamassassin headers,
as per my posting of last night to the list.  Running spamassassin, in
contrast, seems to work properly (which seems to rule out it being a
local configuration issue?).

-- 
Anthony Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to