On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 02:21:43PM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote: > hi, > I got only clean messages with -1.1 > and in /var/log/messages from spamd: > Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm line 184. > Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line > 875. I am getting similar results in testing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/software/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.0> spamc < sample-nonspam.txt > nonspam.out [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/software/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.0> spamc < sample-spam.txt > spam.out ultra:/var/log # tail -n 200 mail.info [...] Sep 23 12:07:28 ultra spamd[7939]: processing message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for anthony:500. Sep 23 12:07:29 ultra spamd[7939]: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm line 184. Sep 23 12:07:29 ultra spamd[7939]: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 875. Sep 23 12:07:29 ultra spamd[7939]: clean message (-2.6/5.0) for anthony:500 in 1.0 seconds, 6494 bytes. Sep 23 12:07:45 ultra spamd[7935]: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 1485 Sep 23 12:07:45 ultra spamd[7943]: info: setuid to anthony succeeded Sep 23 12:07:45 ultra spamd[7943]: processing message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for anthony:500. Sep 23 12:07:45 ultra spamd[7943]: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm line 184. Sep 23 12:07:45 ultra spamd[7943]: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 875. Sep 23 12:07:45 ultra spamd[7943]: clean message (-4.5/5.0) for anthony:500 in 0.4 seconds, 799 bytes. I have also been unable to persuade spamd to add spamassassin headers, as per my posting of last night to the list. Running spamassassin, in contrast, seems to work properly (which seems to rule out it being a local configuration issue?). -- Anthony Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]