On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:21:24 -0400 Jim Maul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:11:39 -0700 > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Kenneth Porter wrote: > >> > Every time I see a spam story on SlashDot I think how the > >> > SlashDot effect could be used for good by getting everyone to > >> > visit the spammer's site and take it to its knees, while > >driving> > up the spammer's bandwidth bill. Check out the first > >few posts> > in today's story: > >> > > >> > <http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/22/1355238> > >> > > >> > It makes me wonder if there's some way to grab a random link > >> > from SURBL to consume a spammer's bandwidth allocation. > >> > >> IMO the best way to combat spam is not to buy the advertised > >> product. > >> > > > > That seems like a no-brainer. What do I need a penis extender > > for? > > > > > > To please the ladies of course! ;) > > -Jim > Sorry "sweetie" ... not all of us need/want that ... ;-) -- Raquel ============================================================ In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different. --Coco Chanel
