Looking forward to it!
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 2:02 AM Christos Malliaridis <
c.malliari...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to invite you all to the presentation about the proposal for a
> new Solr Admin UI.
>
> The presentation is about the content of the current proof-of-co
Hi,
Presumably a previous version worked? What version was that?
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 7:10 AM wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> When starting up Solr Docker Image 9.7.0 I always get the following error
> when loading my core 'places': org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
> ByteBuffersDirectory can on
Based on the problem description, it seems you might have a work-around of
submitting collection admin commands to the Overseer node instead? At
least during the upgrade.
Also... I wonder if upgrading to 9.0 instead of 9.6 may help. Not that I
know of anything specific that's incompatible but I c
Something like this (off the top of my head; didn't verify): fq= $fq.p1
$fq.p2 &fq.p1={!.}&fq.p2={!.}
Note the leading space after fq= here is important for obscure reasons.
~ David Smiley
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 4:12 AM Carlo Ascani wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am ge
/
Obviously, if you don't need a fork then count yourself lucky!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
I tried this in tests both at the Lucene layer and Solr layer and I'm not
seeing the failure to highlight for the UH. What query parser are you
using?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:39 AM seez
This was a bug that was fixed in 8.7:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9427
I thought perhaps hl.weightMatches=false might work but it doesn't. So you
have to upgrade to get this.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
O
quot; for Solr.
(Binding vote)
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 5:00 PM Houston Putman wrote:
> Hello Solr users & devs,
>
> The Solr Operator is the first subproject under Apache Solr and thus needs
&g
!field f=color
v=Red}'etc. Disclaimer: I didn't test that; it *may* be necessary
to move out some of this into other parameters based on parsing
rules/restrictions e.g. childFilter=$theChildFilter and then add a
top-level param. But I think it's not needed.
~ David Smiley
I argue that a env=prod should result in Solr's config APIs
being disabled -- equivalent to -Ddisable.configEdit=true. I believe a
minority of Solr users actually use these APIs, yet they are frequently a
step in exploiting weaknesses in Solr.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
and-authorization-plugins.html
(RBAC -- Role Based Access Control). The ref guide actually uses the
achronym RBAP.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
different
default depending on the setting.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:02 PM Eric Pugh
wrote:
> I think that part of the challenge goes to the deeper issue that
> configuring Solr isn’t easy. We
> Listen on 0.0.0.0 but only accept traffic from private addresses?
Respect x-forwarded-for (and its aliases) in that case.
+1 ! Feel free to file a JIRA issue; maybe there is one already.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Ma
r over year.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 3:39 AM Thomas Corthals
wrote:
> I would like to be able to define core specific permissions with rule-based
> authorization in security.json in the same way you can d
Subquery is a good idea here too. It's slower but it's also more powerful,
more general.
I'll try and get SOLR-15156 into 8.9
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 3:42 PM Jonathan Bridges
wrote:
>
r DURP as you please.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 12:23 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/8/2021 8:05 PM, lamine lamine wrote:
> > I only want the code be run once per shard. One way to guarantee that
&g
Hi,
childFilter is guaranteed to return the documents in the order it was
provided to Solr.
If you want to sort or do other interesting things, consider [subQuery]
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:55 PM Roopa
s running in a debugger with breakpoints, which is why it took 10
seconds :-) I was also using main branch (eventual 9.0).
I ran Solr 8.8 as well, this time in SolrCloud mode, created a "demo"
collection, and I got the same error message as above.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search
The follow-up here from JIRA is that, as of Solr 8.0, you must not add "_root_"
to a schema for an existing collection. Solr uses this field instead of the
uniqueKey for certain identity checks. Chaos will ensue if you add it later.
I shall update the ref guide to add a warning.
~ David
On
Using debug=all you can review in what field(s) the match was on. That
should give clues.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 3:23 PM Flowerday, Matthew J <
matthew.flower...@gb.unisys.com> wrote:
>
/update/processor/TimeRoutedAliasUpdateProcessorTest.java#L184
It'd be nice if it would remove itself from the alias.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 9:26 PM Matt Kuiper wrote:
> I found some helpful inf
Stephen is spot on.
Charlie: As nice as Solr's analysis screen is, it doesn't interpret any
query syntax and so won't show you the multiterm analysis chain results.
The UI ought to clarify this.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidw
It appears you are not using child documents, thus you should not define
_root_.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 4:30 PM Ed Yu wrote:
> We have a solr setup from a very old version (1.4) and we are upgrading
hings.
[3]
https://nightlies.apache.org/solr/draft-guides/solr-reference-guide-main/solr-on-hdfs.html
[4]
https://docs.cloudera.com/HDPDocuments/HDP3/HDP-3.0.0/configuring-hdfs-encryption/content/create_an_encryption_zone.html
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.co
It's out! https://hub.docker.com/_/solr
Thanks for your help Andreas!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 2:11 AM Andreas Hubold
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the docker image for the latest Solr release 8
I'll start the Docker image release process now; it should be out by the
weekend hopefully.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 3:54 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> The Solr PMC is pleased to announce the re
#apache-solr-affected-by-apache-log4j-cve-2021-44228
[2] https://www.docker.com/blog/apache-log4j-2-cve-2021-44228/
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
my theory.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 4:11 AM Surya R wrote:
> hi Solr Devs,
>
> I need guidance on a problem I am having. We recently upgraded to
> solr-8.11. We still use DIH to pull data fr
https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr/pull/401
I would guess perhaps in 12 hours from now maybe.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 9:26 AM Carlos Cueto wrote:
> Any idea when it will be available on Doc
Solr's default logging config isn't vulnerable:
https://solr.apache.org/security.html#apache-solr-affected-by-apache-log4j-cve-2021-44228
You'd have to go out of your way to configure logging to use such this
vulnerable mechanism, and that isn't likely for Solr users to do
I'd prefer to use Lucene's "expressions" module and thus do JavaScript.
This is more accessible to a wider audience, and I believe makes
safety/security easier (though I have not checked).
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsm
a Maven repository manager like
Nexus or it's competitors (last I checked), they are still stuck in the
stone-age -- it's painful when you've been exposed to so much better. On
the backend, if all you know is a database, you may not see how to make a
faceting UI work because it's r
The DIH does not yet support Solr 9 but I don't think it'll be long before
it does.
https://github.com/rohitbemax/dataimporthandler/issues/32
Note the dubious choice of the word "deprecated" was used because it's no
longer a part of Solr. Practically speaking, it *moved*
FYI
I arranged for a Solr Birds of a Feather (BoaF) session at ApacheCon, on
Wednesday October 5th, 5:50-6:30 pm. You will see it in the Expo Pass
app. I expect it'll be relatively informal; a good time to meet 'n greet,
and make dinner arrangements with community members.
~ David Smi
ANNAMANENI: can you clarify what you mean by "multiple repositories"; maybe
"repositories" is a word with specific meaning for your system. If this
functionality were removed, would something be harder? I'm going to guess
you aren't using Docker / containers yet.
I suppose not. The CoreContainer internally knows whether it has completed
or not but I don't see that it's exposed. It seems easy to support such a
feature.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 2:02
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Solr 6.5 to 8.11.2
Solr 9.0
Description:
Apache Calcite has a vulnerability, CVE-2022-39135, that is exploitable
in Apache Solr in SolrCloud mode. If an untrusted user can supply SQL
queries to Solr’s “/sql” handler (even in
. Admittedly I don't have real experience here but this is my
thinking. The most annoying thing about Solr's HDFS support is that
SolrCloud's replication is quite redundant/wasteful with that at the
storage layer, thus adding cost inefficiency. There is potential for
improvements
AR files and
some trivial configuration. The main problem is that such a home-brew
concoction of theoretically compatible things is on your shoulders to
debug/support. Solr isn't testing its support for this; it will fail for
some versions as it did for me. Maybe Solr *should* test/suppor
fund this
sort of thing due to ASF's policies to avoid any appearance of
pay-for-work. I'm wrapping up an Outreachy project as a mentor but it
almost didn't happen due to lack of funding.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
I second Brian's experience. Specific version & numbers reached vary
somewhat.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 7:23 PM Brian Lininger
wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> We're currently running Solr 6.
this
included.
With this email here, I'm trying to ascertain if anyone would care if it
was outright removed.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
Yay, finally!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 9:30 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> DataImportHandler 9.0.0 has now been released for Solr 9.0.0, thanks
Here's a POC: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1729
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 1:53 PM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> Sounds like something that would be very useful for folks.
>
> I'
Here's a POC: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1729
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:36 PM David Smiley wrote:
> Has anyone mitigated the potentially large IO impact of doing a backup of
&
queue and start the next one if appropriate.
> > - This ensures fairness for expensive and non expensive operations.
> > Non-expensive ones will always have at least 40 threads to be quickly
> > handled. And this works well in distributed mode since the overseer is
> not
> &g
Yes; thanks Houston!
This is a notable Solr release.
~ David
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 4:08 PM Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
> Thanks Houston and everyone involved, for the release!
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, 21:56 Houston Putman, wrote:
>
> > The Solr PMC is pleased to announce the release of Ap
Hi Jane,
That change in 7.2 does look like it's correlated, and I'm the one who
implemented it in the name of security.
Could you walk me through a short series of steps to show the problem with
one of Solr's "example" setups like techproducts? Step one is run it, step
two is you sending the que
t;
> Appreciatively,
>
> -Jane
>
> From: David Smiley
> Date: Monday, July 31, 2023 at 5:58 AM
> To: users@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: JSON boolean query syntax with edismax as default QueryParser
> Hi Jane,
>
> That change in 7.2 does look like it's co
ture (an advanced
> search form), and are planning to continue using edismax for all the rest.
>
> -Jane
>
> From: David Smiley
> Date: Monday, July 31, 2023 at 8:53 PM
> To: users@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: JSON boolean query syntax with edismax as default Quer
Thanks for volunteering, Ishan!
I wonder if it's worth it porting the 8x codeline into our build
infrastructure for 9x? i.e. use our existing Gradle build instead of Ant.
This way subsequent releases would be easier (if needed), would be easier
for anyone maintaining a fork of 8x, and we needn't
Alejandro,
How's the newsletter project going? I see October is still in DRAFT state
and I see a new one for November.
Perhaps you were discouraged by the Twitter account status matter; I
recommend completely ignoring that! When it's time to publish, we'll
publish.
~ Davi
This is the ramification of using "timeAllowed" (a request param to a
search)
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 2:18 PM rajani m wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What scenarios would solr warn about "
Enabling docValues on a boolean field is probably not a good idea. If
disabling that doesn't help (and I do think it will), then you might want
to use a simple string field that a doc either has the name of the boolean
(if true) or does not, then facet on that.
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 3:18 PM Mikh
Nearby there's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17112 as well;
rather trivial
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 6:57 AM Vincenzo D'Amore wrote:
> Hi Christine, I can try it.
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:39 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi
The Solr PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 9.4.1.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Solr project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted search, dynamic clustering, database
integration,
es are only 200 characters.
2-3M values -- wow that's something. Solr has to pull all that data
back per doc that's matched.
Good luck,
~ David Smiley
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 5:53 PM Maria Muslea wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am having trouble with highlighting being very slow. I trie
Also look at the logs for warnings. Use of legacy/deprecated stuff is
often logged.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 5:08 AM Isabella Trevisan
wrote:
>
> Hi ,
> I am plannig to migrate from solr 8.11.3 to 9.5.0 in solrcloud
> architecture.
>
> The idea is to create a new line of solrcloud 9.5 where to
Exporter isn't necessarily going away... we'll see what
happens as time goes on.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10654
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
There *is* a Solr blog site that just launched:
https://solr.apache.org/blog.html
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 3:49 PM rajani m wrote:
>
> @Alessandro,
> Is there a solr blog site where we can submit work/articles or are you
> suggesting to post on my own site and share a link here? I prefer the
> fo
see fixing the performance problems
piecemeal with breaking support for certain things (perhaps aliases or
cluster properties... we'll see). The recourse for any hypothetical
user is of course to use the ZK connection or to use plain (non-Cloud)
SolrClient.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr S
Please also need to read release notes :-). (this is not an obscure
thing being discussed)
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 6:25 AM Eric Pugh
wrote:
>
> It would be nice if the exception that was raised had some sort of hint to
> what you need to do to fix it! I suspect we see this question more and mo
Users also need to read the release notes :-). (this is not an obscure
thing being discussed)
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 6:25 AM Eric Pugh
> wrote:
> >
> > It would be nice if the exception that was raised had some sort of hint to
> > what you need to do to fix it! I suspect we see this questio
regression if done:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17375
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
. It was just a special character. Perhaps use a "vertical tab"?
On the Solr side, it then became a very trivial char based iterator which
is already in Lucene/Solr. You might do this as well. You could add a
custom Solr UpdateRequestProcessor (URP) that inserts these characters.
~ Da
Good point. Using a different stored field for highlights has been asked
for; there's a JIRA issue & a patch:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1105
I'm too busy to push this forward by myself but if you can take over there,
I can work with you (or anyone) to get it in.
the collapse
because it's redundant work.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:19 AM Florin Babes wrote:
> Yes. It seems that if you specify sort="score desc" the collapser
> recomputes the
Hi Karl,
Look into the "config apI". Let us know how it goes!
Ideally, this feature would do this automatically.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 2:02 PM Karl Stoney
wrote:
> Hi all,
> We&#
I agree with Erick that it shouldn't matter at all. The freshness is
indifferent to the presence of that cache, since Solr is smart enough to
know when it's dirty.
The document cache is used by RTG and thus will play a role in performance
of it.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search
x27;m imagining a
feature where the UH might see that a particular hl.fl field is not
"stored" yet accommodate this by automatically detecting that this field is
the destination of one copyField declaration whose source is "stored", or
the reverse -- is copied to some other field
et me know.
SOLR-15274 - QueryElevationComponent: auto-load file changes; remove data
dir support <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15274>
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
It appears this setter needs to be
called: org.apache.solr.parser.SolrQueryParserBase#setFuzzyMinSim and it
could be done by edismax. PR welcome!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:28 PM Olivier Tavard
wrote
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/collection-management.html#reindexcollection
See the "fl" param
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 9:01 AM Karl Stoney
wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry for all the questions
so
I could see a need for either forcing it or for Solr to somehow "watch" the
configs to do a commit on that basis.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 4:28 AM Mónica Marrero
wrote:
> It seems to be
Forking anything is a burden on you to maintain your fork. You didn't say
*why* you want to fork something instead of simply use something. You
mentioned adding features but search engine platforms like Solr are
designed to be highly pluggable/extensible without forking. It's a
platform not a pr
FYI I plan to deprecate ExternalFileField for removal in Solr 10
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17655
It's been obsolete for many years.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
26thor 27th with a slight preference to the 27th.
BTW I suggest ruling out 28th as it's a major US holiday (Thanksgiving).
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 10:57 AM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> Hey Christos,
>
> The 26th works best for me personally.
>
> Though you and I have talked a good bit about the UI
Patrick (or Ilan), can you please file a JIRA issue to describe the problem.
Ideally also mention the work-around and possible solution ideas.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 12:27 PM Patrick Lok
wrote:
> Hi Ilan, thank you so much for the pointers! That's exactly the problem. We
> updated our system to
I highly doubt "user managed" (aka "standalone") mode will go away
completely. It *may* become considered so advanced/expert that we might
decide to reduce documentation support around it. But the vast majority of
Solr tests that work with a Solr instance do it in this mode or an even
lesser mode
Creating a core is nothing more than a core.properties file on disk. After
you stop/start Solr with creating a core, see for yourself. There's
nothing magic there. The data directory can be empty of the index.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 1:50 PM John Whelan wrote:
> All,
>
> I've been trying to
If the schema is no different in the comparison then the problem isn't
SOLR-11078.
You had a question earlier about QTime. QTime ends once Solr identifies
what documents to return, and all the search components have completed
(e.g. faceting, highlighting). After this time, Solr still has to fetc
A huge feature!
Can you please remind me of the historical pedigree of the underlying
functionality? You point to "lucene-monitor" but that in turn came from
somewhere. If I'm not mistaken, there was (is?) a Solr plugin out there
from which this started, built by Alan Woodward.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2
Lucene (and thus Solr) does not split segments.
The only closest maybe sorta kinda does situation would be a shard split
with the "rewrite" method.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 11:18 AM ufuk yılmaz
wrote:
> Correct me if I’m wrong, I don’t know if there is an upside of splitting
> an already merged
I agree with ufuk. Don't commit until the end. Commits are only about
visibility of changes, not about durability (in SolrCloud and sometimes
standalone mode). Thus there's no point in sending explicit commits from
the client until the end. In solrconfig.xml, it may help to disable auto
soft co
Hi Andreas,
The test org.apache.solr.CursorPagingTest is a single-core test for
cursorMark. Alternatively, perhaps you might want to modify a KNN query
test like org.apache.solr.search.neural.KnnQParserTest.
BTW, the correct capitalization of "Solr" is as I typed it, not as you are
typing it.
~
ly earlier when SolrCloud collection aliases
first appeared.
[2] SolrJ side is SolrRequest.getCollection's default implementation and is
consulted by CloudSolrClient.
[3] Solr server side is HttpSolrCall (also in a V2 subclass)
[4] Distributed-search reference is in CloudReplicaSource
Ideally, after the user created the JIRA issue, it would be shared in this
thread. Here it is:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17699
(fix for 9.9)
Nice response Hoss, particularly sharing the "filter" trick, which may be
useful here.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 2:18 PM Chris Hostetter
wr
87 matches
Mail list logo
