This was a bug that was fixed in 8.7: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9427
I thought perhaps hl.weightMatches=false might work but it doesn't. So you have to upgrade to get this. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 8:23 AM Srijan <shree...@gmail.com> wrote: > I tried both Standard and DisMax query parsers and the issue is easily > reproducible. And forgot to mention earlier, I am trying this on Solr 8.6.3 > > Just to add more clarity this is what I am doing: > > I have say a field called File_Content_Field with the following values > indexed and stored: "runnings, running, run, runs" > > My query is something like this: > > q=File_Content_Field:runnings~0&hl.fl=File_Content_Field&hl=on > > With original highlighter, I see the following response: > "highlighting": {"document_id": {"File_Content_Field": ["\n \nTest Dataset > 1 Running and <em>Runnings</em> and Runs and R\n \n "] > > > With unified highlighter, no highlighting is returned: > > > q=File_Content_Field:runnings~0&hl.fl=File_Content_Field&hl=on&hl.method=unified > > "highlighting": {"document_id": {"File_Content_Field": []} > > > However, runnings~1 works as expected (highlights both running and > runnings) > > > q=File_Content_Field:runnings~0&hl.fl=File_Content_Field&hl=on&hl.method=unified > "highlighting": { > "document_id": {"File_Content_Field": [ "\n \nTest Dataset 1 > <em>Running</em> and <em>Runnings</em> and Runs and R\n \n ] > } > > > > > On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:32 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I tried this in tests both at the Lucene layer and Solr layer and I'm not > > seeing the failure to highlight for the UH. What query parser are you > > using? > > > > ~ David Smiley > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:39 AM seez <shree...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have the following fuzzy search criteria: > > > > > > runnings~0 > > > > > > Search itself returns expected results and I see documents that have > the > > > exact term "runnings". However the same query criteria is not honored > by > > > unified highlighter. It gives back no matching results. Although > > > "runnings~1" works (with the added caveat of also honoring the "1" edit > > > distance). > > > > > > So it appears unified highlighter only supports edit distance > 0 for > > fuzzy > > > searches. And this is not an issue with original or fastVector > > > highlighters. > > > Is this a real problem or am I missing something? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html > > > > > >
