Re: Slight rendering issues Apache FOP document

2023-11-12 Thread Tilman Hausherr
On 11.11.2023 15:50, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Should this be enough for a bug report? I don't know if they'll bother with a file that needs the PDFBox viewer, they'll claim that we're at fault. When I wrote "they" I meant the java folks. This isn't a PDFBox bug. Tilman

Re: PDF 2.0, PDF/A-4 support

2023-11-12 Thread Tilman Hausherr
On 11.11.2023 07:35, Maruan Sahyoun wrote: Let‘s create tickets for each point and we include them in our release planning. WDYT +1 Tilman Maruan Am 11.11.2023 um 05:32 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : It turns out that the Colorburn / Colordodge change was done 5 years ago: https://svn.a

Re: Slight rendering issues Apache FOP document

2023-11-12 Thread CowwoC
Even if this is a Java bug, being able to detect which PDFs suffer from it would be helpful. At least then you could warn users instead of them running into silent failures. Gili On Sun, Nov 12, 2023, 03:17 Tilman Hausherr wrote: > On 11.11.2023 15:50, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > >> > >> Should th

Re: Slight rendering issues Apache FOP document

2023-11-12 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> > This isn't a PDFBox bug. The fact that this only occurs on MacOS reminds me quite a bit of PDFBOX-4709, where Windows would suffer quality issues at certain DPIs (probably best illustrated visually here: https://github.com/adoptium/adoptium-support/issues/45#issuecomment-655696251 ). PDFBOX-

Re: Slight rendering issues Apache FOP document

2023-11-12 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> > Even if this is a Java bug, being able to detect which PDFs suffer from it > would be helpful. At least then you could warn users instead of them > running into silent failures. I don't yet know how to detect this issue, but since the producer of the PDF -- PitneyShip -- could end up sending

Re: Slight rendering issues Apache FOP document

2023-11-12 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1E3Q9JlywRFyKJ7rSwL9rQNEGdbmvDbgc/view?usp=sharing > > This is an improved file with a rectangular clipping. The trapezoidal > form is not relevant IMHO. > I forgot to mention that this file didn't reproduce the printing issues in my testing, which is why the

Re: Bouncy Castle dependency on Android

2023-11-12 Thread jose
Hey, thanks for answering. > Our own code does not use BC in StandardSecurityHandler which is why > it's optional dependency. This part helps a lot. It's actually working fine on Android. I just wasn't sure if I was missing something and StandardSecurityHandler would try to use BC (and fail) when