> > This isn't a PDFBox bug.
The fact that this only occurs on MacOS reminds me quite a bit of PDFBOX-4709, where Windows would suffer quality issues at certain DPIs (probably best illustrated visually here: https://github.com/adoptium/adoptium-support/issues/45#issuecomment-655696251 ). PDFBOX-4709 did result in a JVM fix: JDK-8256264. Unfortunately PDFBOX 2.0 wasn't able to take advantage of this fix, but PDFBOX 1.8 was. If the bug cannot be fixed in the PDFBOX source as @Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> predicts, I hope that it's still welcome to be tracked there until we can isolate the JVM component that causes the problem. -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 7:42 AM CowwoC <cowwoc2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Even if this is a Java bug, being able to detect which PDFs suffer from it > would be helpful. At least then you could warn users instead of them > running into silent failures. > > Gili > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023, 03:17 Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> wrote: > > > On 11.11.2023 15:50, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > > >> > > >> Should this be enough for a bug report? > > >> > > > I don't know if they'll bother with a file that needs the PDFBox > > > viewer, they'll claim that we're at fault. > > > > When I wrote "they" I meant the java folks. This isn't a PDFBox bug. > > > > Tilman > > >
