On 11/04/2021 12:38, home user wrote:
Those are all the clues and evidence I can think of at the moment.
OK I'm going to "dismiss" what you've said for the reason that I don't
know why it was working for
you in the first place. I went back to installing F31 and the same results.
Not th
On 11/04/2021 13:36, Tim via users wrote:
On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 13:51 -0600, home user wrote:
When I click the gnome "Activities", I no longer see "caja". When I
use the gnome activities search thing, it does not find "caja". But
dnf shows it installed and up-to-date.
My first guess would be t
On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 15:47 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> The "other" way to fix it is to edit the file...
>
>
>
> /usr/share/applications/caja.desktop
>
>
>
> and comment out as shown
>
>
>
> #NoDisplay=true
>
> #OnlyShowIn=MATE;
>
>
>
> Caveat: This file is a "system-wide" file and may
Hello there,
I did, and saddly he can't really help, since on Ubuntu and Arch, which
he knows how to use, I assume, he does not encounter that error.
He said that he does not have any familiarity with Fedora, so he really
can't help.
Still, thanks for everything.
Best regards.
Francisco.
On 2021-04-11 12:47 a.m., Ed Greshko wrote:
The "other" way to fix it is to edit the file...
/usr/share/applications/caja.desktop
and comment out as shown
#NoDisplay=true
#OnlyShowIn=MATE;
Caveat: This file is a "system-wide" file and may get overwritten on
updates. This file affects all u
2021-04-11 6:38 UTC+02:00, home user :
[...]
> * symlinks -r -d /usr
This isn't necessarily a good idea, because those dangling symlinks
may belong to their respective packages. If so, removing them will
compromise the integrity of the package they belong to.
Looking through the system logs (journalctl --boot), I stumbled on the
following error messages from firewalld; it looks like the function
iptables-restore is called fairly frequently, generally after the
system wakes up from sleep, and never succeeds. The intervening lines
vary.
Is this somethin
On 4/11/21 8:20 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
Looking through the system logs (journalctl --boot), I stumbled on the
following error messages from firewalld; it looks like the function
iptables-restore is called fairly frequently, generally after the
system wakes up from sleep, and never succeeds.
> It doesn't actually work like that. Only the kernel is kept, not
> everything. When you pick a different entry, you're only selecting a
> different kernel. All the other software is the same.
Do you mean that all the other software is the same as the newest? If I do a
weekly patch (dnf up
> But, I can tell you how to "fix" it.
>
> Install "menulibre". This will allow you to add a "launcher". It
> will then be visible when you search
> in the search bar in "Activities". And you can add it to your
> "Favorites" if you wish.
I'm opting for the more general fix in your later post.
> The "other" way to fix it is to edit the file...
>
> /usr/share/applications/caja.desktop
>
> and comment out as shown
>
> #NoDisplay=true
> #OnlyShowIn=MATE;
>
> Caveat: This file is a "system-wide" file and may get overwritten on
> updates.
> This file affects all users
> The previous "m
> To make it not system-wide, copy the file to
> ~/.local/share/applications/ and edit it there.
I want this fix to be system-wide. But thank-you.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists
> I wonder if it's supposed to be undisplayed and only in MATE, or was
> that a goof. The original poster might try filing a bug report and see
> what the response is.
Ed's suggestion to edit /usr/share/applications/caja.desktop worked. Should I
still file a bug?
___
> 2021-04-11 6:38 UTC+02:00, home user
> [...]
>
>
> This isn't necessarily a good idea, because those dangling symlinks
> may belong to their respective packages. If so, removing them will
> compromise the integrity of the package they belong to.
I don't fully understand. Of what use is a li
On 12/04/2021 04:54, home user wrote:
I wonder if it's supposed to be undisplayed and only in MATE, or was
that a goof. The original poster might try filing a bug report and see
what the response is.
Ed's suggestion to edit /usr/share/applications/caja.desktop worked. Should I
still file a bu
2021-04-11 23:02 UTC+02:00, home user :
>> 2021-04-11 6:38 UTC+02:00, home user >
>> [...]
>>
>>
>> This isn't necessarily a good idea, because those dangling symlinks
>> may belong to their respective packages. If so, removing them will
>> compromise the integrity of the package they belong to.
>
On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 20:46 +, home user wrote:
> > It doesn't actually work like that. Only the kernel is kept, not
> > everything. When you pick a different entry, you're only selecting
> > a
> > different kernel. All the other software is the same.
>
> Do you mean that all the other so
On 4/11/21 3:03 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/04/2021 04:54, home user wrote:
I wonder if it's supposed to be undisplayed and only in MATE, or was
that a goof. The original poster might try filing a bug report and see
what the response is.
Ed's suggestion to edit /usr/share/applications/caja.desk
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 05:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> It is most likely they want it this way.
I have to wonder how they expected you to browse the file system if
they hide the file browser.
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 18:28:22 UTC 2021 x86_64
Boilerp
On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 20:46 +, home user wrote:
> Do you mean that all the other software is the same as the newest?
> If I do a weekly patch (dnf upgrade), and that patch includes patches
> to vim or firefox, and then the next day I boot into one of the older
> entries in the grub menu, I sho
在 2021-04-11星期日的 08:20 -0700，Jonathan Ryshpan写道：
> Looking through the system logs (journalctl --boot), I stumbled on
> the following error messages from firewalld; it looks like the
> function iptables-restore is called fairly frequently, generally
> after the system wakes up from sleep, and never
On 12/04/2021 12:59, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 05:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
It is most likely they want it this way.
I have to wonder how they expected you to browse the file system if
they hide the file browser.
They expect you to use the file browser of the desktop you
22 matches
Mail list logo
