Re: Spam removal (was: Re: $spam_subject)

On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 21:28 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > George N. White III wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Jul 2020 at 18:40, Patrick O'Callaghan > > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 19:57 +, ravi fieldengineer wrote: > [Snipped spam content, it's bad enough they got it on the > list once. I

Re: Various bugs with the new 5.7 kernel on Fedora 32

On 7/26/20 11:56 PM, stan via users wrote: That is the problem with the dnf technique, it doesn't give the actual package name, you have to put it together manually. On my system I ran the following convoluted command in order to isolate a single kernel. rpm -qa | grep ^kernel | grep 5\.8 | gre

Re: Various bugs with the new 5.7 kernel on Fedora 32

On 7/27/20 12:23 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: Refer to the "SPECIFYING PACKAGES" section in the dnf man page. It explains the syntax options you can use to specify a , which is used by many dnf commands, like dnf remove. The doc is all good but without some real examples I find it difficult to

Re: Various bugs with the new 5.7 kernel on Fedora 32

On 7/27/20 12:51 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: You didn't give the output from dnf, but I assume that it only let you remove the kernel metapackage because you can't remove the running kernel. I don't know what I removed at first, but it did remove something according to DNF. A better command, at

Re: Various bugs with the new 5.7 kernel on Fedora 32

On 7/27/20 12:53 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: A "lot" of bugs? Yeah, I have linked a full pastebin of errors in the first message of this thread. Don't get be wrong, 5.6 also had errors at startup according to journalctl -b, but nothing as basic as not being able to initialize swap or mounting t

Re: Various bugs with the new 5.7 kernel on Fedora 32

On 7/27/20 1:15 AM, Dave Ulrick wrote: In my opinion, this is a pretty easy workaround. I'll stick with the 5.7 kernel unless I run into other issues. 5.7 could not mount /boot/efi in my case. Also there was a message : Failed Loading Kernel Modules In my case I need it to be more stable b

Re: Various bugs with the new 5.7 kernel on Fedora 32

On 7/27/20 1:49 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: Interesting, I've only ever used "dd" to create swap files.  Anyway, if you do run into this problem, there's a very simple fix. If this was the only problem I may have reconsidered, but even /boot/efi was not mounted on my system and God knows what other

Re: Where are the microcode updates for Crosstalk in F32 ?

On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 12:36 AM stan via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > In Intel's defense, they have to be very cautious with updating the > microcode. I imagine that getting it wrong could have consequences up > to and including bricking the machine. Or it could introduce anot

Re: video in Firefox not streaming

On 7/26/20 5:41 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-07-27 05:37, Jerry James wrote: Have you installed ffmpeg? See upthread. Maybe the OP is not familiar with rpmfusion?  It may be helpful to tell him he can enable rpmfusion repos by the command  (all on one line) sudo dnf install https://downloa

Re: video in Firefox not streaming

On 2020-07-27 21:43, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote: > > On 7/26/20 5:41 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-07-27 05:37, Jerry James wrote: >>> Have you installed ffmpeg? See upthread. >> Maybe the OP is not familiar with rpmfusion?  It may be helpful to tell him >> he can enable >> rpmfusion repos by

Re: NFS4: CentOS 7 client with a Fedora 32 server

On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 10:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-07-15 22:20, Braden McDaniel wrote: > > I'd like to support a CentOS 7 client from a Fedora 32 NFS4 server. > > Other Fedora 32 clients can mount the volume just fine using: > > > >$ mount -t nfs4 my-server:/my-export-root/foo /fo

Re: Various bugs with the new 5.7 kernel on Fedora 32

On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:46:30 +0530 Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > Did the trick perfectly. Only have 2 stable 5.6 kernels now. Great! > What is the difference between dnf and rpm ? When do I use dnf over > rpm and vice versa ? Shouldn't DNF be able to do everything that rpm > does ? > > What is

Re: NFS4: CentOS 7 client with a Fedora 32 server

On 2020-07-27 22:03, Braden McDaniel wrote: > On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 10:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-07-15 22:20, Braden McDaniel wrote: >>> I'd like to support a CentOS 7 client from a Fedora 32 NFS4 server. >>> Other Fedora 32 clients can mount the volume just fine using: >>> >>>$ m

Re: Various bugs with the new 5.7 kernel on Fedora 32

Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > On 7/27/20 12:23 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> Refer to the "SPECIFYING PACKAGES" section in the dnf man >> page. It explains the syntax options you can use to >> specify a , which is used by many dnf >> commands, like dnf remove. > > The doc is all good but without

Re: NFS4: CentOS 7 client with a Fedora 32 server

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:04 PM Braden McDaniel wrote: > > As for my configuration, in /etc/nfs.conf, I have set: > >[nfsd] >vers2=n >vers3=n > > Apart from that, it has the Fedora 32 installation defaults. > > /etc/exports looks like: > > /my-export-root/foo *(rw) With the above, you

Re: SPDIF sound in F32

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:32 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > mythtv@seveneves ~]$ amixer -c0 scontrols > > Simple mixer control 'PCM',0 > > Simple mixer control 'PCM Capture Source',0 > > Simple mixer control 'PCM',1 > > Simple mixer control 'PCM',2 > > Maybe I should have asked for the more verbose

Re: Various bugs with the new 5.7 kernel on Fedora 32

On 7/27/20 5:29 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: On 7/27/20 1:15 AM, Dave Ulrick wrote: In my opinion, this is a pretty easy workaround. I'll stick with the 5.7 kernel unless I run into other issues. 5.7 could not mount /boot/efi in my case. Also there was a message : Failed Loading Kernel Mod

Re: Various bugs with the new 5.7 kernel on Fedora 32

On 7/27/20 7:17 AM, stan via users wrote: On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:46:30 +0530 Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: Did the trick perfectly. Only have 2 stable 5.6 kernels now. Great! What is the difference between dnf and rpm ? When do I use dnf over rpm and vice versa ? Shouldn't DNF be able to do ev

Re: Various bugs with the new 5.7 kernel on Fedora 32

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:05 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > I've had that message for a very long time on many computers. It hasn't > had any effect and I haven't bothered investigating what it's trying to > load. > Well have tried accessing the /boot/efi directory on computers that you did receive t

Re: Various bugs with the new 5.7 kernel on Fedora 32

On 7/27/20 12:00 PM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:05 PM Samuel Sieb > wrote: I've had that message for a very long time on many computers.  It hasn't had any effect and I haven't bothered investigating what it's trying to load. We

Re: video in Firefox not streaming

Well, I did verify that even the FF downloaded from mozilla requires ffmpeg in order to play the video when the embedded JW Player is served by the website. I don't believe that this is an issue with required plugins at this point. As a new example, the video in https://www.iceni.com/transpdf

Re: video in Firefox not streaming

On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:08:32 -0500 Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote: > I don't believe that this is an issue with required plugins at this > point. As a new example, the video in > https://www.iceni.com/transpdf.htm (screenshot > So I would appreciate if someone tells me if this means that this is >

Re: video in Firefox not streaming

On 2020-07-28 04:08, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote: > >> Well, I did verify that even the FF downloaded from mozilla requires ffmpeg >> in order to play the video >> when the embedded JW Player is served by the website. >> > I don't believe that this is an issue with required plugins at this point.

Re: video in Firefox not streaming

On 2020-07-28 04:08, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote: > >> Well, I did verify that even the FF downloaded from mozilla requires ffmpeg >> in order to play the video >> when the embedded JW Player is served by the website. >> > I don't believe that this is an issue with required plugins at this point.

touchpad driver - F32

Touchpad stopped working with version 32 (perhaps earlier?) At one point there was an X.org configuration required, but that appears to have become irrelevant. Is there a FAQ? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: touchpad driver - F32

Add'l info. Running XFCE. Touchpad is not listed in the Mouse page, so presumably the touchpad is broken? On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:44:09 -0700 Geoffrey Leach wrote: > Touchpad stopped working with version 32 (perhaps earlier?) At one > point there was an X.org configuration required, but that app

Re: touchpad driver - F32

On 7/27/20 3:07 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote: Running XFCE. Touchpad is not listed in the Mouse page, so presumably the touchpad is broken? Check if your keyboard has a disable touchpad button. Check in the BIOS settings if there's a touchpad setting for smart. Sometimes that one doesn't work with

Re: SPDIF sound in F32

There has been a completely new development in this saga. One thing I had also been investigating was to see if I could somehow get surround sound through the onboard Intel sound chip. This chip does not have a iec958 (optical) device however, so it wasn't going to work directly with my receiver. A

Re: SPDIF sound in F32

On 7/27/20 8:13 AM, Greg Woods wrote: mythtv@seveneves ~]$ amixer -c0 controls numid=19,iface=CARD,name='IEC958 In - Output Jack' That's promising. Try: amixer -c0 sset 'IEC958 In - Output Jack' on Now that you've enabled the onboard sound card, it might have changed the numbering, so if that