/tmp uses 8 Gb, that is half of my RAM. Then my RAM is fully occupied
as soon as I open Plasma+Firefox+Thunderbird. But /tmp is used at 1%
only. Can I reduce it to 4Gb? I do not see any entry in /etc/fstab
(have F24).
Thanks,
Frédéric
___
users mailing l
On 11/18/16 21:10, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> /tmp uses 8 Gb, that is half of my RAM. Then my RAM is fully occupied
> as soon as I open Plasma+Firefox+Thunderbird. But /tmp is used at 1%
> only. Can I reduce it to 4Gb? I do not see any entry in /etc/fstab
> (have F24).
This really shouldn't be much
> While tmpfs does utilize RAM it will actually move contents to swap in the
> event RAM is
> actually needed.
So that's normal that my RAM looks full (in top) and the swap and /tmp
are empty. This means that I still have about 8Gb free RAM available,
right? I am happy then.
Thanks,
Frédéric
trivial it is!!
My inability to solve this in a few mins, says more about me, than the
difficulty of the prob!
The following:
ssh -t crawl_user@67.205.135.251 "screen -RDS crawlSession
will attach to a detached named screen session.. the term pops up with
the attached screen from the SSH.. T
On 11/18/2016 07:39 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
While tmpfs does utilize RAM it will actually move contents to swap in the
event RAM is
actually needed.
So that's normal that my RAM looks full (in top) and the swap and /tmp
are empty. This means that I still have about 8Gb free RAM available,
rig
Since I was not able to install Fedora 24 successfully the way mentioned,
I used the ISO image for getting a successful installation:
wget
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/24/Server/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-aarch64-24-1.1.iso
sudo virt-install --name Fedora_24_AArch
On 11/18/2016 06:15 AM, bruce wrote:
> trivial it is!!
>
> My inability to solve this in a few mins, says more about me, than the
> difficulty of the prob!
>
> The following:
> ssh -t crawl_user@67.205.135.251 "screen -RDS crawlSession
>
> will attach to a detached named screen session.. the
hmm...
Think I resolved the issue of the ctrl-a d -- sequence, It appears
screen -X allows for the use of tags, so the "detach" appears to be a
substitute for the ctrl-A d sequence..
However, I'm still flumoxed on how to run a background process on the remote vm.
The following "should" work, but
On 11/18/2016 06:30 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 11/18/2016 07:39 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
>>> While tmpfs does utilize RAM it will actually move contents to swap
>>> in the event RAM is
>>> actually needed.
>>
>> So that's normal that my RAM looks full (in top) and the swap and /tmp
>> are empty
On 11/18/2016 12:04 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
The main problem for using a RAMdisk-based /tmp is that a hell of a lot
of utilities still write temp files to /tmp and with its limited size,
you often get "filesystem full" errors.
Before you start on me,...
Oh, no disagreement there. I come from a
Good lord!
3 days later.. give or take.. still haven't gotten this to where it "works"..
Here's what I'm seeing and what I think is happening.
In my case, I want to start up a base instance/vm with a screen
session already defined, but the session is detached. The user that
created/started scree
Allegedly, on or about 14 November 2016, Chris Murphy sent:
> Two finger scroll off means two finger scroll doesn't happen. It
> doesn't mean you get single finger scroll. I've never heard of single
> finger scroll unless you click and hold the "shuttle" UI element
> that's on the right side of a w
I've just noticed that the footers appended to each mail to this list
no-longer have a webpage address to the mailing list WWW interface.
I don't see one in the headers, either.
--
Boilerplate: All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is
no point trying to privately email me, I
Allegedly, on or about 15 November 2016, Gary Stainburn sent:
> As someone who has a F21 server that I was just thinking of fedup'ing,
> what would be my best choice? (I really don't want to do a clean
> install)
I really just cannot imagine going through several updates-over-the-top,
to get fro
Hi, everyone,
I loaded go using dnf...
sudo dnf install go
I am on an AMD64 system with F24 installed.
The issue is that the /usr/share/gocode/src/code.google.com/p
was empty. I installed the golang...devel package and it added the
go.tools directory with several
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:28:09AM +, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> As someone who has a F21 server that I was just thinking of fedup'ing,
So, not that this is recommended, but Adam Williamson recently posted
about successfully upgrading from Fedora 13 to Fedora 25. So... this is
possible. You're ju
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:57:08AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> 20 -> 21
> 21 -> 22
> 22 -> 23
> 23 -> 24
> 24 -> 25
> The first few will use Fedup, the later ones will use dnf. The chances
The dnf system update plugin was added as an update to F21, so it's
only the first hop that will be d
On 11/18/2016 01:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:57:08AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
20 -> 21
21 -> 22
22 -> 23
23 -> 24
24 -> 25
The first few will use Fedup, the later ones will use dnf. The chances
The dnf system update plugin was added as an update to F21, so
I have successfully built this package.
Are there any players that play audio DVD's?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/18/2016 12:20 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
> Hi, everyone,
> I loaded go using dnf...
> sudo dnf install go
>
> I am on an AMD64 system with F24 installed.
>
> The issue is that the /usr/share/gocode/src/code.google.com/p
> was empty. I installed the golang...devel pack
On 11/18/2016 01:02 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>
> On 11/18/2016 01:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:57:08AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> 20 -> 21
>>> 21 -> 22
>>> 22 -> 23
>>> 23 -> 24
>>> 24 -> 25
>>> The first few will use Fedup, the later ones will use dnf. The chance
Some of this is a repeat, as this comes up from time to time.
Neither Red Hat nor Fedora currently have Btrfs developers to manage any
Btrfs regressions that come up. And as the upstream development is still
very busy, there are regressions, and there's every reason to believe
Fedora users would g
Hi,
I'm late to this, but i can't recommend Btrfs multiple device stuff for
those unaware of the state. While stable, the problem is it doesn't have
any of the notification capabilities as mdadm or lvm raid. Also, it's
pretty unsuitable for rootfs because unattended degraded boot isn't
possible.
On 11/18/2016 10:04 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
installation. I'm somewhat surprised that they actually gave us a
relatively easy way to get around this stupid idea. I wish it were as
easy to sh*tcan systemd and journalctl (two other really moronic, overly
complicated and badly implemented ideas).
On 11/18/2016 09:51 AM, bruce wrote:
> hmm...
>
> Think I resolved the issue of the ctrl-a d -- sequence, It appears
> screen -X allows for the use of tags, so the "detach" appears to be a
> substitute for the ctrl-A d sequence..
>
> However, I'm still flumoxed on how to run a background process
On 11/18/2016 03:13 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/18/2016 10:04 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> installation. I'm somewhat surprised that they actually gave us a
>> relatively easy way to get around this stupid idea. I wish it were as
>> easy to sh*tcan systemd and journalctl (two other really moronic,
On 11/18/2016 03:45 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
What can I say? You are entitled to your opinions, as am I.
Of course, but the problem is in how you are expressing that opinion.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send a
On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 13:25 -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 11/18/2016 12:20 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
> >
> > Hi, everyone,
> > I loaded go using dnf...
> > sudo dnf install go
> >
> > I am on an AMD64 system with F24 installed.
> >
> > The issue is that the /usr/share/gocode/src
Hey Rick...
Thanks for the input. Really appreciate it.
The issue I seem to have involves how to attach to a screen that's been created.
I start the base process, with the following.
ssh crawl_user@159.203.185.29 "screen -d -m -S 'crawlSession' "
which creates a detached session.
Wha
Everyone,
Thank you all for your help. I had to put my problem on hold until I
had time to digest all you advice. I almost got a sledge hammer out,
but restrained myself.
The problem turned out to be related to the using the front usb ports
instead of the usb ports on the back of the machine as
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 02:02:39PM -0700, jd1008 wrote:
> How about updating f20 to 21 with
> yum -y upgrade --releasever=21
> Would that work?
Probably -- see the caveats at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_package_manager.
Additionally, old releases are moved off of the mir
On 11/18/2016 05:37 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 13:25 -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 11/18/2016 12:20 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
Hi, everyone,
I loaded go using dnf...
sudo dnf install go
I am on an AMD64 system with F24 installed.
The issue i
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:15 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> Are there any players that play audio DVD's?
>
I imagine system will recognize audio format from DVD once inserted and
send it to the appropriate preferred player. VLC is my personal fav. File
-> Open Disk; and should pick it right up. I make g
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:20:55PM -0500, fred roller wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:15 PM, jd1008 <[1]jd1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Are there any players that play audio DVD's?
>
>I imagine system will recognize audio format from DVD once inserted and
>send it to the appropriate
On 11/18/2016 08:35 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:20:55PM -0500, fred roller wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:15 PM, jd1008 <[1]jd1...@gmail.com> wrote:
Are there any players that play audio DVD's?
I imagine system will recognize audio format from DVD once inse
Dear Fedora Users,
I have just downloaded and booted up the Fedora Workstation Live 24
DVD. It seems that there is no option to upgrade my existing Fedora
Workstation 23 to 24. The only option appears to be fresh new
installation in which I would lose all existing data.
Please advise me on how I
Allegedly, on or about 18 November 2016, Robert Nichols sent:
> With /tmp on disk, files are written initially to the buffer cache, and
> get flushed out to disk when something else needs the RAM or,
> eventually, by the automatic push of dirty buffer pages. For the latter
> case, a copy of the
37 matches
Mail list logo
