Tom:
The last time I crashed back to the login screen I hit the little
'gear' icon to see what choices I had installed, and I could pick from
"GNOME" "GNOME Classic" and "GNOME with Wayland" (iirc, perhaps not
verbatim). I had been using "GNOME Classic" and thought I'd try
Wayland for the experien
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I have two monitors and an nvidia graphic card. I uses the nvidia
proprietary driver from rpmfusion and have configured the system to
use the twinview option.
I need to load an icc profile for each screen (they are not exactly
the same) and
I've got a problem I can't quite figure out and I'm hoping a Fedora list
member can give me a hand. These systems are all Ubuntu based, but this
doesn't appear to be an OS related issue as much as maybe I'm missing
something with the configuration.
We're needing to scale out one of our websites t
On 02/12/2016 05:53 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
When I pull it through the load balancer (HTTPS) it doesn't with an
error about mixed content.
...
Or can someone begin to tell me where to start debugging.
View the source of the page in FF, and look for the string "http://";
Something in the site i
Confirm the hp h240 to work out of the box with fedora 23 driver (hp
drivers are not yet up to date with latest kernel)
2016-02-03 20:20 GMT+01:00 thibaut noah :
> My raid drives consume 11w per disk at maximum load and i have more than
> 400w left on my power supply.
>
> Thanks for the clarifica
The load balancer is just HAProxy on a Linux box (Ubuntu, but totally
irrelevant, I think). While I can do SSL passthrough, I'm still stumped as
to why this is a problem. The media listed does have 'http://' items
listed, but what doesn't make sense is that the server I'm pulling from
doesn't hav
On 02/12/2016 07:40 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
While I can do SSL passthrough, I'm still stumped as to why this is a
problem. The media listed does have 'http://' items listed, but what
doesn't make sense is that the server I'm pulling from doesn't have
that problem when it's pure HTTPS. I would t
When I googled "joomla https proxy urls", the first result suggests:
"UPDATE: Disabling "Search Engine Friendly URLs" permits use of HTTPS
--> HTTP."
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
It looks like I'm better off just using SSL passthrough for this. We're
already good with SSL on the web servers themselves, so it seems pointless
to try to undo all that for this. We're moving away from joomla over the
next year or so as we're far exceeding what it was designed to do with what
we
On 02/12/2016 03:25 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
The last time I crashed back to the login screen I hit the little
'gear' icon to see what choices I had installed, and I could pick from
"GNOME" "GNOME Classic" and "GNOME with Wayland" (iirc, perhaps not
verbatim). I had been using "GNOME Classic" and tho
On 02/11/2016 11:57 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
I have just upgraded my usb wireless adapter from a Dlink DWA182
which was not supported by the kernel, which I'm told never will be
supported by the kernel, to a Dlink DWA192 which appears to be natively
supported by the kernel. The issue
On 02/11/2016 07:02 PM, stan wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:12:43 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a couple Android recordings that I need to convert to wav, so
I went to use my copy of audacity-freeworld to do the conversion. It
crashed on opening the flie. I have the LAME files and hav
I have been messing with a firewall file
and added the following:
config rule
option src lan
option src_ip 192.168.1.7
option dest wan
option target REJECT
It works to prevent internet access from
that ip. However I can still ping
On 02/12/2016 11:10 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have been messing with a firewall file and added the following:
config rule
option src lan
option src_ip 192.168.1.7
option dest wan
option target REJECT
It works to prevent internet a
On 02/12/16 15:10, Rick Stevens wrote:
Not sure which firewall you're using.
Judging by your description of its
behavior, the odds are that the
(unless otherwise specified) default
protocol the rules affect is TCP. If
that's the case, yes, your rules
would prevent TCP-based activity
(telnet,
On 02/12/2016 12:10 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 02/12/2016 11:10 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have been messing with a firewall file and added the following:
config rule
option src lan
option src_ip 192.168.1.7
option dest wan
option ta
On 02/12/2016 12:28 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
The objective is to protect my servers which I want connected to the LAN
but not the internet. The firewall is in the router, openwrt, I want to
set up.
I haven't had to play with router firewalls in several years, and that
never included this type of
On 02/12/16 15:39, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/12/2016 12:28 PM, Bob Goodwin
wrote:
The objective is to protect my
servers which I want connected to the
LAN
but not the internet. The firewall is
in the router, openwrt, I want to
set up.
I haven't had to play with router
firewalls in several year
On 02/12/16 15:30, Rick Stevens wrote:
There's a whole lot of protocols that
come under the "IP" umbrella.
Dump out the content of
/etc/protocols if you want to see a
(fairly
complete, but not exhaustive) list of
what's out there.
After more digging around, it appears
you're using firewal
On 02/12/2016 12:28 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 02/12/16 15:10, Rick Stevens wrote:
Not sure which firewall you're using. Judging by your description of its
behavior, the odds are that the (unless otherwise specified) default
protocol the rules affect is TCP. If that's the case, yes, your rules
w
On 02/12/2016 12:45 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I hadn't thought of that Joe, probably only one of the things I didn't
consider. With other routers it was just another GUI menu item, I
entered the ip's and left it at that hoping for the best. Here I'm being
forced to look at what I'm doing, not a ba
On 02/12/2016 12:47 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Ok, I'll try adding that. Joe brings up the need to keep a route open to
NTP, that presents another concern.
Either that, or set up a local NTP server on a box that's not blocked.
Let that box sync to the rest of the net and have your LAN all sync to
On 02/12/2016 11:10 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
It works to prevent internet access from that ip. However I can still
ping 8.8.8.8
In a very general sense, DROP may be preferred to REJECT when you are
dealing with protocols other than TCP or UDP.
For TCP, a firewall can reject a packet by sending
On 02/12/16 15:53, Rick Stevens wrote:
The objective is to protect my
servers which I want connected to the
LAN
but not the internet. The firewall is
in the router, openwrt, I want to
set up.
As I said in another post, my guess is
that it affects TCP and UDP.
The rule you commented out woul
On 02/12/16 16:12, Gordon Messmer wrote:
It works to prevent internet access
from that ip. However I can still
ping 8.8.8.8
In a very general sense, DROP may be
preferred to REJECT when you are
dealing with protocols other than TCP
or UDP.
For TCP, a firewall can reject a
packet by sendi
I'm trying to convert my wife's laptop from Windows 7 to Fedora 22 running
KDE 5. However, when she browses the web, occasionally the page will
scroll as fast it can - either up or down - with no input on her part,
other than loading the page.
The problem occurs with Firefox, Seamonkey, and Konqu
On 02/12/16 16:01, Joe Zeff wrote:
Ok, I'll try adding that. Joe brings
up the need to keep a route open to
NTP, that presents another concern.
Either that, or set up a local NTP
server on a box that's not blocked.
Let that box sync to the rest of the
net and have your LAN all sync to it.
On 02/12/2016 01:01 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/12/2016 12:47 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Ok, I'll try adding that. Joe brings up the need to keep a route open to
NTP, that presents another concern.
Either that, or set up a local NTP server on a box that's not blocked.
Let that box sync to the rest o
On 02/12/2016 01:24 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
This system is already grown too complex over the years, I would like to
avoid adding a local NTP server to it although I have considered trying
to use a GPS time source ... Hmm, another project.
Remember, this doesn't need to be a dedicated box. All
On 02/12/16 16:36, Joe Zeff wrote:
Remember, this doesn't need to be a
dedicated box. All you need to do is
set it up on any box that's always up
and has Internet access.
.
The ones that are always up are the two
I want to protect. But I will consider that.
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virgin
On 02/12/2016 01:34 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
Carrying that further, set up the firewall to block all incoming traffic
initially and use "DROP" as the target--NOT "REJECT". The reason to use
DROP is that "REJECT" actually returns a response to a probe which
essentially says "Yeah, there's a machine
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:25:54 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
[snip]
> Actually my first choice was to use audacity to do the conversion.
> Thus I was trying to load amr into audacity. Audacity should not
> crash hard on loading a codec it does not understand.
Correct. It should give a message t
On 02/12/16 19:12, Joe Zeff wrote:
If you want to find out just how
secure you are, here's a good place to
test your firewall:
https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2
--
.
That seems to indicate that my firewall
is working well, dunno how much
confidence I can have in it? It's been
severa
Allegedly, on or about 12 February 2016, Rick Stevens sent:
> Carrying that further, set up the firewall to block all incoming
> traffic initially and use "DROP" as the target--NOT "REJECT". The
> reason to use DROP is that "REJECT" actually returns a response to a
> probe which essentially says "Y
On 02/12/2016 06:13 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 02/12/16 19:12, Joe Zeff wrote:
If you want to find out just how secure you are, here's a good place
to test your firewall: https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2
--
.
That seems to indicate that my firewall is working well, dunno how
much con
On 01/18/2016 03:05 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
> a recent update installed kernel-4.3.3 so i reset the xen efi
> configuration, booted got into the desktop no problems. The issue
> arises when trying to launch vms from virt-manager, it always throws
> a virt-manager viewer connection to hypervisor
On 02/12/2016 06:16 PM, jd1008 wrote:
The website Joe mentions only tested the UPNP of the router I am
connected to.
Of course the test failed to make use of upnp because the router blocks
those requests
coming from the internet.
You can also have it do a port scan, to see which, if any ports r
On 02/12/2016 07:35 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/12/2016 06:16 PM, jd1008 wrote:
The website Joe mentions only tested the UPNP of the router I am
connected to.
Of course the test failed to make use of upnp because the router blocks
those requests
coming from the internet.
You can also have it d
On 02/12/2016 06:42 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Interesting. I did not see a link on the page for doing port scan.
When you go to that page and click on the button to Proceed, you get to
https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?rh1dkyd2 and if you scroll down past the
UPnP Exposure Test, you'll see where you can h
On 02/12/2016 08:05 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/12/2016 06:42 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Interesting. I did not see a link on the page for doing port scan.
When you go to that page and click on the button to Proceed, you get
to https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?rh1dkyd2 and if you scroll down past
the UPn
On 02/12/2016 07:44 PM, jd1008 wrote:
All I am getting from that page is:
*Browser Reload Suppressed
Interesting. Do you have any special security settings, or addons? All
I can say is, it works just fine for me.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change s
On 02/12/2016 08:45 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/12/2016 07:44 PM, jd1008 wrote:
All I am getting from that page is:
*Browser Reload Suppressed
Interesting. Do you have any special security settings, or addons?
All I can say is, it works just fine for me.
Yes.
I have noscript enabled.
So, I
On 02/13/16 11:44, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 02/12/2016 08:05 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On 02/12/2016 06:42 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>>> Interesting. I did not see a link on the page for doing port scan.
>>
>> When you go to that page and click on the button to Proceed, you get to
>> https://www.grc.com/x/ne.
Looks like the brcm driver has some issues, but I am not certain what's
causing them.
I have bazillions of these messages in dmesg and in /var/log/messages*
(where the
kernel buffer is finally dumped).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opti
44 matches
Mail list logo
