Re: f22: how to change default gateway via line command

2015-06-09 Thread James Hogarth
On 8 Jun 2015 13:12, "Dario Lesca" wrote: > > Il giorno sab, 06/06/2015 alle 21.43 +0300, Alchemist ha scritto: > > Couple of possible solutions > > Thanks Alchemist, one of that sure probably partially solves my > problem. > > But the question is: Why in f22 (or new version of NetworkManager?) it

Re: Fedora 22 is here!

2015-06-09 Thread valent.turko...@gmail.com
Here is bugzilla link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224534 But now that I searched I see few similar open bugs. I see @birger saying that it is a driver issue, thought so. I hope some red hat people up the chain ladder also have this issue with their laptops and contact Lenovo and

Re: Re: Fedora 22 is here!

2015-06-09 Thread valent.turko...@gmail.com
Thanks for your reply, this is the information I was missing! DisplayLink is crucial search keyword, so after DuckDuckGo-ingit (yeah, I know) found a ArchWiki page that says there is some experimental open source support: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DisplayLink So is there a way to get Di

Re: f22: how to change default gateway via line command

2015-06-09 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/09/15 15:26, James Hogarth wrote: > > > On 8 Jun 2015 13:12, "Dario Lesca" > wrote: > > > > Il giorno sab, 06/06/2015 alle 21.43 +0300, Alchemist ha scritto: > > > Couple of possible solutions > > > > Thanks Alchemist, one of that sure probably partially solves my

Re: Re: Fedora 22 is here!

2015-06-09 Thread valent.turko...@gmail.com
Sorry I missed this crucial line: "Note: Modern USB 3.0 DisplayLink adapters are not supported as of October 2014.[1] Older DisplayLink chips (USB 2.0) are supported." On 9 June 2015 at 09:43, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: > Thanks for your reply, this is the information I was missing! > Disp

Re: Fedora 22 is here!

2015-06-09 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/09/15 15:38, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: > Here is bugzilla link: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224534 > > But now that I searched I see few similar open bugs. I see @birger > saying that it is a driver issue, thought so. I hope some red hat > people up the chain ladder

Re: rpmfusion down

2015-06-09 Thread g
On 06/08/2015 09:38 PM, William Biggs wrote: <> > Thank's for the info if look like it was a server error or they was > rebuilding the site it back up today again, only the real Ed Greshko knows for sure. ;-) -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh

dnf nonlocal update

2015-06-09 Thread Robert Dady
Hi, I have 2 computers: "A" has F22 and 3G cell phone Internet connection with a limited data plan, "B" has Windows7 / Ubuntu 15.04 / F22 Live and broadband Internet connection. I want "A" make a (dnf) list of packages of available updates, which I could download on "B" and install them offline o

Re: workstation spin

2015-06-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 10:54:35PM +, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > I'm not talking about the desktop, choosing one or another is trivial. > I'm talking about install time. I installed F22 from the live iso > (the only available), and I had no choice of customizing what's being > installed. Maybe I

Re: workstation spin

2015-06-09 Thread Martin Cigorraga
May be he could try Korora (www.kororaproject.org) which has everything setup and all eye-candy on right OOTB for graphical users. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:55 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 10:54:35PM +, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > > I'm not talking about the desktop, choosing

Re: workstation spin

2015-06-09 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 08:55:07AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 10:54:35PM +, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > > I'm not talking about the desktop, choosing one or another is trivial. > > I'm talking about install time. I installed F22 from the live iso > > (the only available)

Re: sound problem in F20, F21, F22

2015-06-09 Thread dwoody5654
On 06/02/2015 11:37 PM, dwoody5654 wrote: On 06/02/2015 03:03 PM, Steven Stern wrote: On 06/02/2015 01:52 PM, dwoody5654 wrote: Posted here and on alsa mailing list some time ago - many comments but none fixed the problem. This is the link to bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi

Re: Fedora 22 is here!

2015-06-09 Thread Rick Stevens
On 06/09/2015 12:43 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your reply, this is the information I was missing! DisplayLink is crucial search keyword, so after DuckDuckGo-ingit (yeah, I know) found a ArchWiki page that says there is some experimental open source support: https://wiki.archl

Re: f22: how to change default gateway via line command

2015-06-09 Thread Rick Stevens
On 06/09/2015 12:44 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/09/15 15:26, James Hogarth wrote: On 8 Jun 2015 13:12, "Dario Lesca" mailto:d.le...@solinos.it>> wrote: Il giorno sab, 06/06/2015 alle 21.43 +0300, Alchemist ha scritto: Couple of possible solutions Thanks Alchemist, one of that sure probabl

Re: dnf nonlocal update

2015-06-09 Thread Rick Stevens
On 06/09/2015 04:52 AM, Robert Dady wrote: Hi, I have 2 computers: "A" has F22 and 3G cell phone Internet connection with a limited data plan, "B" has Windows7 / Ubuntu 15.04 / F22 Live and broadband Internet connection. I want "A" make a (dnf) list of packages of available updates, which I cou

Re: f22: how to change default gateway via line command

2015-06-09 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/10/15 02:34, Rick Stevens wrote: > you have to specify the connection name, not the interface name. Connection > names are shown via "nmcli connection show --active" under > the "NAME" column. On my laptop: [root@f22k ~]# nmcli connection show --active NAMEUUID

PXE-install F22 Workstation

2015-06-09 Thread Paul Franklin
I am trying to install F22 and need some help. I want to do a PXE-install from my local repo of an NFS-mounted ISO image (not a looped image, not a tree) of the Workstation, and I haven't found anything which mentions getting it from an ISO image. I've tried various things, none of which have wor

Re: f22: how to change default gateway via line command

2015-06-09 Thread Dario Lesca
Il giorno lun, 08/06/2015 alle 21.40 +, Martin Cigorraga ha scritto: > Hello guys, > Dario, did you try stopping the NetworkManager services to then try > to do your stuff? > I didn't tried this yet but I suppose it should work... Yes, it work. I can change default gateway. But when I restart N

Re: workstation spin

2015-06-09 Thread Amadeus W.M.
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 18:17:56 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 08:55:07AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 10:54:35PM +, Amadeus W.M. wrote: >> > I'm not talking about the desktop, choosing one or another is trivial. >> > I'm talking about install time.

Re: f22: how to change default gateway via line command

2015-06-09 Thread Dario Lesca
Il giorno mar, 09/06/2015 alle 15.44 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto: > Or not > > [root@f22k ~]# nmcli conn mod enp0s3 ipv4.gateway 192.168.1.18 > Error: Failed to modify connection 'enp0s3': ipv4.gateway: gateway > cannot be set if there are no addresses configured > > FWIW, on this system ..

Re: f22: how to change default gateway via line command

2015-06-09 Thread Rick Stevens
On 06/09/2015 03:40 PM, Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno mar, 09/06/2015 alle 15.44 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto: Or not [root@f22k ~]# nmcli conn mod enp0s3 ipv4.gateway 192.168.1.18 Error: Failed to modify connection 'enp0s3': ipv4.gateway: gateway cannot be set if there are no addresses conf

Nautilus (Files) don want to open

2015-06-09 Thread Isaac Cortés González
I've been trying to open nautilus and this what ocured if I try it in a terminal: >nautilus: error while loading shared libraries: /lib64/libexempi.so.3: file t >oo short -Isaac C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://

Basic drivers, installation and regular session

2015-06-09 Thread Isaac Cortés González
If I installed f22 in "basic mode" (or with basic drivers), do I have to change anything (post-installation, of course) in order to use the regular drivers? -Isaac C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedorapr

Re: Nautilus (Files) don want to open

2015-06-09 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/10/15 07:03, Isaac Cortés González wrote: > I've been trying to open nautilus and this what ocured if I try it in > a terminal: > >> nautilus: error while loading shared libraries: /lib64/libexempi.so.3: file t >> oo short What version of fedora? In F21, [egreshko@meimei ~]$ yum whatprovid

Re: workstation spin

2015-06-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:40:03PM +, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > I understand the parsimony of the live image, but why isn't there a > full fledged workstation iso available anymore? Or is there and I > just missed it? There's no reasonble way to distribute media with all of the software that someo

Re: Nautilus (Files) don want to open

2015-06-09 Thread Isaac Cortés González
Now I got this: ("El fichero": The file."está vació": it is empty. "no se comprueba": not hecked) > sbin/ldconfig: El fichero /lib64/libfolks-dummy.so.25.18.0 está vacío, no se > comprueba. > > /sbin/ldconfig: El fichero /lib64/libgfapi.so.0 está vacío, no se comprueba. > /sbin/ldconfig: El ficher

Re: Basic drivers, installation and regular session

2015-06-09 Thread Rick Stevens
On 06/09/2015 04:05 PM, Isaac Cortés González wrote: If I installed f22 in "basic mode" (or with basic drivers), do I have to change anything (post-installation, of course) in order to use the regular drivers? You have to be much more specific than that. What do you mean by "basic"? The vast

Re: Basic drivers, installation and regular session

2015-06-09 Thread Isaac Cortés González
-Isaac C. You have to be much more specific than that. What do you mean by > > "basic"? > > The vast majority of drivers (and by that I mean software that control > or manage various pieces of hardware) are part of the kernel package > and that really doesn't vary regardless of what spin or

Re: Nautilus (Files) don want to open

2015-06-09 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/10/15 07:22, Isaac Cortés González wrote: > Now I got this: > > ("El fichero": The file."está vació": it is empty. "no se comprueba": not > hecked) > > sbin/ldconfig: El fichero /lib64/libfolks-dummy.so.25.18.0 está vacío, no se > > comprueba. > > > > /sbin/ldconfig: El fichero /lib64/libgfa

dnf whatprovides and library files

2015-06-09 Thread Ed Greshko
I can't seem to get dnf to tell me what package supplies a library. For example, on an F22 system [root@f22k ~]# ll /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 19664 Aug 17 2014 /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 [root@f22k ~]# dnf whatprovides /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 Last metadata expiration check perf

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

2015-06-09 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/09/2015 04:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: What can I do to get "whatprovides" to work consistently? I know that yum is now deprecated, but does it still work for this? If so, there's a problem with dnf and you should file a bug report; if not dnf isn't part of the issue. -- users mailing li

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

2015-06-09 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/10/15 08:02, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 06/09/2015 04:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> What can I do to get "whatprovides" to work consistently? > > I know that yum is now deprecated, but does it still work for this? If so, > there's a problem with dnf and you should file a bug report; if not dnf isn'

Re: Basic drivers, installation and regular session

2015-06-09 Thread Rick Stevens
On 06/09/2015 04:29 PM, Isaac Cortés González wrote: -Isaac C. You have to be much more specific than that. What do you mean by > > "basic"? > > The vast majority of drivers (and by that I mean software that control > or manage various pieces of hardware) are part of the kernel p

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

2015-06-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 07:53:44AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > For example, on an F22 system > [root@f22k ~]# ll /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 19664 Aug 17 2014 /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 $ file /lib64 /lib64: symbolic link to `usr/lib64' $ dnf whatprovides /usr/lib64/libXv.so.1

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

2015-06-09 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/10/15 09:09, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 07:53:44AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> For example, on an F22 system >> [root@f22k ~]# ll /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 >> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 19664 Aug 17 2014 /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 > $ file /lib64 > /lib64: symbolic link to `usr/

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

2015-06-09 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/10/15 09:26, Ed Greshko wrote: > I wonder why they left it up to the user to determine symbolic links are > involved and not followed. Oh, well. To make things even more confusing, in my mind, is that it isn't as simple as symbolic links. [egreshko@meimei /]$ ll /usr/lib64/libXv.so.1 lrw

Re: f22: how to change default gateway via line command

2015-06-09 Thread Tim
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 00:22 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote: > But when I restart NM the gateway change again > then this (stop NM) is not a valid solution for me. For what it's worth, you're trying two mutually exclusive commands, as far as I can see. NetworkManager automatically configures things as i

Re: f22: how to change default gateway via line command

2015-06-09 Thread Tim
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 00:40 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote: > [lesca@dodo ~]$ LANG=c sudo nmcli conn mod p6p1 ipv4.gateway > 192.168.61.250 > Error: Failed to modify connection 'p6p1': ipv4.gateway: gateway > cannot be set if there are no addresses configured > > This occur why the field "ipv4.addresse

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

2015-06-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:26:36AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > I wonder why they left it up to the user to determine symbolic links > are involved and not followed. Oh, well. It's because what's being searched is the database of files provided by a package. The package doesn't actually provide the

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

2015-06-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:30:08AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > To make things even more confusing, in my mind, is that it isn't as > simple as symbolic links. > [egreshko@meimei /]$ ll /usr/lib64/libXv.so.1 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 14 Aug 17 2014 /usr/lib64/libXv.so.1 -> > libXv.so.1.0.0 > [egres

Re: Nautilus (Files) don want to open

2015-06-09 Thread Donato Roque
-- Use my PGP key if you want to encrypt your replies/messages to me. You are invited to also send me your PGP keys so we can communicate in private. On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 17:03 -0600, Isaac Cortés González wrote: > I've been trying to open nautilus and this what ocured if I try it in > a termi

Re: Nautilus (Files) don want to open

2015-06-09 Thread Ed Greshko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/10/15 10:03, Donato Roque wrote: > > -- > Use my PGP key > > if you want to encrypt your replies/messages to me. You are invited to also > send me your PGP keys

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

2015-06-09 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/10/15 09:35, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:26:36AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> I wonder why they left it up to the user to determine symbolic links >> are involved and not followed. Oh, well. > It's because what's being searched is the database of files provided by > a pa

Re: Basic drivers, installation and regular session

2015-06-09 Thread Isaac Cortés González
> If you installed a desktop spin (Gnome, Xfce, MATE, KDE), then the > open source drivers were installed (e.g. nouveau for nVidia chipsets, > ati_drv/radeon_drv for AMD chipsets, etc.) > > If you want the vendor-provided ones, you need to install the > appropriate akmod-whatever or kmod-whatever d

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

2015-06-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:12:58AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > While that does make sense it ends up being less than helpful for the > average user to have to be aware of that. I dare say most end users > don't care if a programmer has to jump through hoops to give a result > which they feel "approp

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

2015-06-09 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/10/15 11:13, Matthew Miller wrote: > A 'usrmove provides' seems like a reasonable suggestion for a DNF > plugin — cover the normal symlinks in Fedora. > I'm seriously considering reviving my script writing skills to put a wrapper around dnf to deal with /bin, /lib, /lib64, and /sbin. :-)

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

2015-06-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:24:09AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > A 'usrmove provides' seems like a reasonable suggestion for a DNF > > plugin — cover the normal symlinks in Fedora. > I'm seriously considering reviving my script writing skills to put a wrapper > around dnf to deal with /bin, /lib,

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

2015-06-09 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 06/09/2015 04:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: I can't seem to get dnf to tell me what package supplies a library. ... [root@f22k ~]# ll /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 19664 Aug 17 2014 /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 [root@f22k ~]# dnf whatprovides /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 That's the correct q