On 06/10/15 09:26, Ed Greshko wrote: > I wonder why they left it up to the user to determine symbolic links are > involved and not followed. Oh, well.
To make things even more confusing, in my mind, is that it isn't as simple as symbolic links. [egreshko@meimei /]$ ll /usr/lib64/libXv.so.1 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 14 Aug 17 2014 /usr/lib64/libXv.so.1 -> libXv.so.1.0.0 [egreshko@meimei /]$ dnf whatprovides /usr/lib64/libXv.so.1 Using metadata from Wed Jun 10 07:46:42 2015 (1:42:24 hours old) libXv-1.0.10-2.fc21.x86_64 : X.Org X11 libXv runtime library Repo : @System libXv-1.0.10-2.fc21.x86_64 : X.Org X11 libXv runtime library Repo : fedora Again, oh well.... :-) -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
